Trump is finally...

Maybe the Clinton camp should have taken a closer look at what was happening in social media and thus trace more back to the Russians, but it wasn't the inept Trump campaign (now the inept Trump administration) that her campaign and Democrats missed, it was the new thing of a Russian thumb on the election combined with the Republicans' voter suppression and finagling efforts. Trump didn't win the popular vote election and Clinton didn't lose the popular vote election. Espionage that was welcomed by the Trump campaign (and that eventually is going to be caught up with) made the difference. The Trump regime is doing absolutely nothing to prevent foreign intervention the next time around either.
 
Different thing altogether. Hope it goes well.

Thanks, it went great, had to go to Dallas to see a specialist but totally worth it.

The book I was referring to differentiates misogyny vs sexism. But the idea is a man has a certain view of women, resulting in control over them and punishing them for stepping out of their place.

A distinction worth making.

Don't know if she addresses the latter, but my guess is that if he doesn't have a similar view of men then reactions to authority challenges would be seen operating differently.

Yes.

And I don't see that. He will shit talk and name call anyone he see's as opposition or challenging his authorah-tah. John McCain for example.....

He's an opportunist, a unashamed pig that is certainly sexist to an extent....but not a misogynist.
 
Horseshit revisionism.

Back in 2007-2008, when you were pisting as Vetteman, you swore there was no such thing as a "recession" during the Bush administration, and then when even YOU couldn't deny it you claimed the recession was over in January 2008 and John McCain would win a landslide victory.

....then, when That Negro President won, you and your fellow Rapepublicans decided to make him a "one term president" by any means necessary, putting party over country, and sabotaging the economic comeback.

President Obama beat you, so now you're trying to rewrite history and claim that Trump, who inherited a very strong robust economy, is actually the architect behind this recovery.

Krugman-level derp.

Let me guess. All due to Obama's "Green Energy Economy" policies that were designed to make energy "necessarily more expensive" with the goal of reducing consumption miraculously having the opposite effect of ramping up oil production which was the only bright spot.

If only Trump would appoint you and Krugman to advisry positions, we could climb our way back to Obama-level prosperity from the Trump malaise, amirite?
 
Maybe the Clinton camp should have taken a closer look at what was happening in social media and thus trace more back to the Russians, but it wasn't the inept Trump campaign (now the inept Trump administration) that her campaign and Democrats missed, it was the new thing of a Russian thumb on the election combined with the Republicans' voter suppression and finagling efforts. Trump didn't win the popular vote election and Clinton didn't lose the popular vote election. Espionage that was welcomed by the Trump campaign (and that eventually is going to be caught up with) made the difference. The Trump regime is doing absolutely nothing to prevent foreign intervention the next time around either.

On the other hand, Fake Pilot /Fake Spy makes RevisionistDownSouth look sane. Not even the DNC which spent millions on a post-mortem to appease their donors after losing to a buffoon the vastly overspent concluded any of that was relevent in their most apologetic whitewash.
 
Last edited:
On the other hand, Fake Pilot /Fake Spy makes RevisionistDownSouth look same. Not even the DNC which spent millions on a post-mortem to appease their donors after losing to a buffoon the vastly overspent concluded any of that was relevent in their most apologetic whitewash.

But is looking "same" a good thing or a bad thing in a Trumpette's bag of pat phrases? ;)
 
Maybe the Clinton camp should have taken a closer look at what was happening in social media and thus trace more back to the Russians, but it wasn't the inept Trump campaign (now the inept Trump administration) that her campaign and Democrats missed, it was the new thing of a Russian thumb on the election combined with the Republicans' voter suppression and finagling efforts. Trump didn't win the popular vote election and Clinton didn't lose the popular vote election. Espionage that was welcomed by the Trump campaign (and that eventually is going to be caught up with) made the difference. The Trump regime is doing absolutely nothing to prevent foreign intervention the next time around either.

"Buuh buuh the popular vote!!"

KeithD still hasn't figured out how US presidential elections work.
 
"Buuh buuh the popular vote!!"

KeithD still hasn't figured out how US presidential elections work.

Might need to explain how the electoral college works to him. Popular vote is more like a bragging rights kind of thing. The sweet electoral votes of Texas, Florida, New York, and California only go so far to any given candidate.
 
No free thinking in the orange trainwreck administration..

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-amash-impeachment-153829368.html

Trump calls GOP lawmaker who called for impeachment a 'loser'

President Trump fired back at Rep. Justin Amash, R-Mich., on Sunday, a day after Amash became the first Republican congressman to call for Trump's impeachment.

Among other things, Trump called Amash a "total lightweight" and a "loser."

"Never a fan of @justinamash, a total lightweight who opposes me and some of our great Republican ideas and policies just for the sake of getting his name out there through controversy," Trump tweeted.

Amash, a libertarian-oriented Republican, said Saturday that he had concluded that Trump committed impeachable offenses after reading special counsel Robert Mueller's report on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.
 
LOL. You do realize that when you result to name calling and insults, frail as they are, you got nothing.

I do realize how utterly unprepared you are to discuss current events. Ignorance is one thing but intellectual dishonesty is a symptom of something far worse. Your incessant appeal to fallacy constantly undermines your arguments. The only question, is this practice based on your personal ignorance or is it a nefarious ploy to undermine the actual truth that makes a reasoned response futile? I think both. In other words, up until now you've proven yourself to be an unworthy opponent. Meanwhile search out and understand the meaning of intellectual humility, build some personal integrity, and then come back and try again.
 
I do realize how utterly unprepared you are to discuss current events. Ignorance is one thing but intellectual dishonesty is a symptom of something far worse. Your incessant appeal to fallacy constantly undermines your arguments. The only question, is this practice based on your personal ignorance or is it a nefarious ploy to undermine the actual truth that makes a reasoned response futile? I think both. In other words, up until now you've proven yourself to be an unworthy opponent. Meanwhile search out and understand the meaning of intellectual humility, build some personal integrity, and then come back and try again.

You use your own stupidity and back it up with bullshit from fox news.


Talk about being a one legged man(term man used loosely) in an ass kicking contest. :rolleyes:
 
Cowslinger has entered chat.

Insert -> blah blah blah

Cowslinger has left chat.
 
I do realize how utterly unprepared you are to discuss current events. Ignorance is one thing but intellectual dishonesty is a symptom of something far worse. Your incessant appeal to fallacy constantly undermines your arguments. The only question, is this practice based on your personal ignorance or is it a nefarious ploy to undermine the actual truth that makes a reasoned response futile? I think both. In other words, up until now you've proven yourself to be an unworthy opponent. Meanwhile search out and understand the meaning of intellectual humility, build some personal integrity, and then come back and try again.

LOL! Took you awhile, how many edits did it take to write this gibberish? Plenty, I’m thinking.

And this coming from a guy who thinks Fox News prepares him to have an informed opinion when discussing current events, including the economy. :rolleyes:
 
Cowslinger has entered chat.

Insert -> blah blah blah

Cowslinger has left chat.

So, the question of should men who allow their women to get an abortion be charged with murder? Manslaughter? Aiding and abetting?


Got the balls to answer? Or are they not allowed in your panties?
 
LOL! Took you awhile, how many edits did it take to write this gibberish? Plenty, I’m thinking.

And this coming from a guy who thinks Fox News prepares him to have an informed opinion when discussing current events, including the economy. :rolleyes:

I took time to eat breakfast. Understand one thing, you're always going to be wrong, own it, kid.
 
^^^^^^^
Someone is talking way off topic or posted on the wrong thread.

In other news: Did anyone catch what Trump said in regards to Iran today?
https://youtu.be/W-Pmo8X3xlI
🐾Kant

That's what I thought, snowflake.

By answering you actually take a stand with reasons.. instead of just being guided by emotions.


Then you can be called on it instead of being able to move the goalposts around.

Like timmy, with his birther stoopid.
 
I’m sorry. Was someone talking to you? If you wanna talk off topic, then there’s some great deals on Amazon today. You should check them out. A whole can of IDGAF is half off.
 
Back
Top