Trump is finally...

You think the economy suddenly did a 180 when Trump came into office?

As does everyone with an education in economics, notwithstanding the left and it's command of economic fantasy. You have to be a dumb son of a bitch to believe the steaming bullshit that the only President in history not to see 3% GDP had anything to do with the historic economic expansion we see right now. he was the clown who told us 1% was the new normal, that we'd never see 3% again, and that Trump would have to have a magic wand to turn the economy around. Own the disaster that was Barack Obama.:rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
The economy is mostly the economy and largely a carry over from the Obama years (including programs and incentives in place to bring back companies/jobs from other countries). Trump's bumped it some, but he hasn't supercharged it. And some of his deregulations and rollbacks may come back to haunt us.

I don't think Trump has any sort of grand plan. He didn't even think he was going to be president, he had zero transition team in place.

If the Dems don't get it together it's a real possibility.

It’s interesting you brought up the topic of carry over.

So at what point do we stop crediting Obama and start giving credit to Trump for the economy? From day one,Trump went after dismantling Obama regulations, partnerships, treaties. If the economy is merely carry over from Obama’s administration, then the economy wouldn’t be booming as it is with Trump rolling back Obama’s policies. Just my opinion.

The fact is there’s no way the Democrats can argue Trump’s economy that’s firing on all cylinders at the moment. How can they make a great economy better? Going back to Obama policies? Fat chance on that. Now, all we need is for the Democrats to sit back and legislate Bipartisan laws to heal the divide in this country instead of investigating the shit outta nothing of value worth investigating just to break Trump’s momentum.

Remember,Obama had 8 years to handle some of these problems. But, he passed them along. Trump isn’t the best president by a long shot, but if his hands weren’t tied with the Democrat’s BS, maybe he could accomplish a bit more.
 
Last edited:
As does everyone with an education in economics, notwithstanding the left and it's command of economic fantasy. You have to be a dumb son of a bitch to believe the steaming bullshit that the only President in history not to see 3% GDP had anything to do with the historic economic expansion we see right now. he was the clown who told us 1% was the new normal, that we'd never see 3% again, and that Trump would have to have a magic wand to turn the economy around. Own the disaster that was Barack Obama.:rolleyes::rolleyes:

Obama’s policies had a direct affect on putting Trump into office. That’s the real reason the Left wants to remove Trump to undo the 2016 election. It’s just an opinion, but probably not too far from the truth.
 
It’s interesting you brought up the topic of carry over.

So at what point do we stop crediting Obama and start giving credit to Trump for the economy? From day one,Trump went after dismantling Obama regulations, partnerships, treaties. If the economy is merely carry over from Obama’s administration, then the economy wouldn’t be booming as it is with Trump rolling back Obama’s policies. Just my opinion.

The fact is there’s no way the Democrats can argue Trump’s economy that’s firing on all cylinders at the moment. How can they make a great economy better? Going back to Obama policies? Fat chance on that. Now, all we need is for the Democrats to sit back and legislate Bipartisan laws to heal the divide in this country instead of investigating the shit outta nothing of value worth investigating just to break Trump’s momentum.

Remember,Obama had 8 years to handle some of these problems. But, he passed them along. Trump isn’t the best president by a long shot, but if his hands weren’t tied with the Democrat’s BS, maybe he could accomplish a bit more.



Obama may have been a little more successful had he spent more time governing and less time spying.
 
An ortho wanted to cut me once when I was having back pain so in my case I just paid attention to posture and fixed it that way.

That's cool.

Unfortunately paying attention to posture doesn't make shrapnel go away.

Only way to fix that was to go in and get it out.


I figured you'd go for a strict definition that doesn't allow for subtleties. There is an argument being made the misogyny is not just hatred, but about controlling and punishing women who challenge male dominance.

"male dominance" as some monolithic oppressive force all men exude upon women isn't a thing....the very notion is blatantly sexist and demonstrably wrong on it's face.

An individual mans dominance however is not.

So that only applies if the control/punishment is because they are female, or because they are challenging him and under what circumstances.

And does he do the same thing to men who challenges his dominance??
 
Last edited:
As does everyone with an education in economics, notwithstanding the left and it's command of economic fantasy. You have to be a dumb son of a bitch to believe the steaming bullshit that the only President in history not to see 3% GDP had anything to do with the historic economic expansion we see right now. he was the clown who told us 1% was the new normal, that we'd never see 3% again, and that Trump would have to have a magic wand to turn the economy around. Own the disaster that was Barack Obama.:rolleyes::rolleyes:

Horseshit revisionism.

Back in 2007-2008, when you were pisting as Vetteman, you swore there was no such thing as a "recession" during the Bush administration, and then when even YOU couldn't deny it you claimed the recession was over in January 2008 and John McCain would win a landslide victory.

....then, when That Negro President won, you and your fellow Rapepublicans decided to make him a "one term president" by any means necessary, putting party over country, and sabotaging the economic comeback.

President Obama beat you, so now you're trying to rewrite history and claim that Trump, who inherited a very strong robust economy, is actually the architect behind this recovery.
 
As does everyone with an education in economics, notwithstanding the left and it's command of economic fantasy. You have to be a dumb son of a bitch to believe the steaming bullshit that the only President in history not to see 3% GDP had anything to do with the historic economic expansion we see right now. he was the clown who told us 1% was the new normal, that we'd never see 3% again, and that Trump would have to have a magic wand to turn the economy around. Own the disaster that was Barack Obama.:rolleyes::rolleyes:

The fuck you on about? Go read/listen to something besides InfoWars, Fox and Breitbart

It’s interesting you brought up the topic of carry over.

So at what point do we stop crediting Obama and start giving credit to Trump for the economy? From day one,Trump went after dismantling Obama regulations, partnerships, treaties. If the economy is merely carry over from Obama’s administration, then the economy wouldn’t be booming as it is with Trump rolling back Obama’s policies. Just my opinion.

I never said I gave credit to Obama. Fact just is things have been picking up for years so the carry over is things are picking up. I already said there was a Trump bump from deregulation and such, so he's had a positive effect so far, but he didn't turn the ship around.

The fact is there’s no way the Democrats can argue Trump’s economy that’s firing on all cylinders at the moment. How can they make a great economy better? Going back to Obama policies? Fat chance on that. Now, all we need is for the Democrats to sit back and legislate Bipartisan laws to heal the divide in this country instead of investigating the shit outta nothing of value worth investigating just to break Trump’s momentum.

I do think there's some there there, but we'll see. Would like to see some infrastructure legislation.

Remember,Obama had 8 years to handle some of these problem. But, he passed them along. Trump isn’t the best president by a long shot, but if his hands weren’t tied with the Democrat’s BS, maybe he could accomplish a bit more.

Same can be said for Obama years when Republicans set out to deny Obama everything by tying his hands. And nothing was stopping Trump from doing his thing while Mueller was investigating.
 
Obama’s policies had a direct affect on putting Trump into office. That’s the real reason the Left wants to remove Trump to undo the 2016 election. It’s just an opinion, but probably not too far from the truth.

If Obama and his weaponized administration wasn't such a political aberration and force for evil. America wouldn't have needed an ass kicker like Trump to tear it all down. So yes his failed policies were responsible...along with, I suppose, the lack of energy on Hillary's part to oppose him. ;)
 
The fuck you on about? Go read/listen to something besides InfoWars, Fox and Breitbart

I've never read or listened to Infowars, numb nuts. Fox is the only place where you can hear both sides of the story, try it sometime, you wouldn't be so ignorant.
 
The fuck you on about? Go read/listen to something besides InfoWars, Fox and Breitbart



I never said I gave credit to Obama. Fact just is things have been picking up for years so the carry over is things are picking up. I already said there was a Trump bump from deregulation and such, so he's had a positive effect so far, but he didn't turn the ship around.



I do think there's some there there, but we'll see. Would like to see some infrastructure legislation.



Same can be said for Obama years when Republicans set out to deny Obama everything by tying his hands. And nothing was stopping Trump from doing his thing while Mueller was investigating.

Nah, I don’t think Trump turned the economy around. He just took it out of park at 1% and put it in high gear. If he plays his cards right, he’ll get his 2nd term a lot easier than the first time.
 
That's cool.

Unfortunately paying attention to posture doesn't make shrapnel go away.

Only way to fix that was to go in and get it out.

Different thing altogether. Hope it goes well.

"male dominance" as some monolithic oppressive force all men exude upon women isn't a thing....the very notion is blatantly sexist and demonstrably wrong on it's face.

An individual mans dominance however is not.

So that only applies if the control/punishment is because they are female, or because they are challenging him and under what circumstances.

And does he do the same thing to men who challenges his dominance??

The book I was referring to differentiates misogyny vs sexism. But the idea is a man has a certain view of women, resulting in control over them and punishing them for stepping out of their place.

Don't know if she addresses the latter, but my guess is that if he doesn't have a similar view of men then reactions to authority challenges would be seen operating differently.
 
I've never read or listened to Infowars, numb nuts. Fox is the only place where you can hear both sides of the story, try it sometime, you wouldn't be so ignorant.

Fox has gotten a bit better lately. But the early years seem to have corroded your thinking.
 
If Obama and his weaponized administration wasn't such a political aberration and force for evil. America wouldn't have needed an ass kicker like Trump to tear it all down. So yes his failed policies were responsible...along with, I suppose, the lack of energy on Hillary's part to oppose him. ;)

Hillary’s biggest mistake was not seeing the writing on the wall and take Trump seriously, thinking he was just a passing phase in politics. Not to mention, she bought into the polls that had her pegged as the winner by a long shot. I wonder if she mentioned any of this in her boring book that I never bothered to read?
 
Last edited:
Hillary’s biggest mistake was not seeing the writing on the wall and take Trump seriousl, thinking he was just a passing phase in politics. Not to mention, she bought into the polls that had her pegged as the winner by a long shot. I wonder if she mentioned any of this in her boring book that I never bothered to read?

She listened to her fawning mainstream media fantasizing about her greatness and popularity with the American people so adoringly that when Reality was bending her over for the final insult she refused to believe it wasn't the smiling Huma and her "big Willy" dildo.
 
She listened to her fawning mainstream media fantasizing about her greatness and popularity with the American people so adoringly that when Reality was bending her over for the final insult she refused to believe it wasn't the smiling Huma and her "big Willy" dildo.

Even if she threw her name into the hat now to run, she wouldn’t make the grade to be president.
 
Hillary’s biggest mistake was not seeing the writing on the wall and take Trump seriousl, thinking he was just a passing phase in politics. Not to mention, she bought into the polls that had her pegged as the winner by a long shot. I wonder if she mentioned any of this in her boring book that I never bothered to read?

I don't recall any poll that had her winning by a long shot. Do you have a link to one?
 
Back
Top