Who Do You Blame (The MOST) for 2016?

Who is responsible for Trump’s Victory?


  • Total voters
    34
It's a real pleasure having your fat stupid ass on ignore, botanydummy.


You've been up all night posting idiocy to people that revile you and see you for the stupid, lying POS you are.... you and queball, living a "fulfilling" life.:rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
It's a real pleasure having your fat stupid ass on ignore, botanydummy.


You've been up all night posting idiocy to people that revile you and see you for the stupid, lying POS you are.... you and queball, living a "fulfilling" life.:rolleyes::rolleyes:


LOL makes up lies....accuses me of lying while he cowers behind iggy, typical.
 
In typical giant head fashion... say something completely wrong, and rather than say "yeah, I blew it on that one"... attempts to pile on more and more and more and more crap in order to get something to bloom.


You were wrong, queball.. it's not the first time. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:


If you weren't such an arrogant douche about stuff like that, there would be no reason to point it out.

Is it still possible for someone to be The Smartest Guy In The Room® if nobody believes him and he has no receipts?

https://media.giphy.com/media/lE9wZlVFiFaKY/giphy.gif

Whew. That mandatory schmuck life on the daily is a grind, man. Glad I don't need it! :D
 
Is it still possible for someone to be The Smartest Guy In The Room® if nobody believes him and he has no receipts?

https://media.giphy.com/media/lE9wZlVFiFaKY/giphy.gif

Whew. That mandatory schmuck life on the daily is a grind, man. Glad I don't need it! :D

Lol.. like our lardass friend botanydummy, he is a legend in his own mind and own mind only.


I love the way they argue their points.. rather than give anything to back up their assertions they use their opinions. Which have been shown numerous times to be worthless.:rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
Lol.. like our lardass friend botanydummy, he is a legend in his own mind and own mind only.


I love the way they argue their points.. rather than give anything to back up their assertions they use their opinions. Which have been shown numerous times to be worthless.:rolleyes::rolleyes:

So much projection from the coward hiding in his iggy bunker. :)
 
No he didn't, you lie.

The rest of the world saw it, you must have been reaching climax.

When asked about Russian meddling in our 2016 election, he took the word of KGB Colonel Putin over the entire US intelligence community. It was humiliating and depressing to REAL Americans to witness the President of the US capitulate to the Russian scumbag
 
I sort of like him. He and Pelosi strategized the Mid Terms so they're doing something right.

Schumer is the drag if you ask me. A completely useless waste of space. And some of these sleepwalking Congress people.


I think that Tom Perez is a stiff. I think he hurts the party. What do you think?
 
I sort of like him. He and Pelosi strategized the Mid Terms so they're doing something right.

Schumer is the drag if you ask me. A completely useless waste of space. And some of these sleepwalking Congress people.

Thank you for responding. My thought is that I would like to see someone more vocal and animated like Howard Dean to respond to Trump.
 
The rest of the world saw it, you must have been reaching climax.

When asked about Russian meddling in our 2016 election, he took the word of KGB Colonel Putin over the entire US intelligence community. It was humiliating and depressing to REAL Americans to witness the President of the US capitulate to the Russian scumbag

Or, you know, Trump said he doesn't trust the then admin's intelligence community. Which we NOW KNOW was conspiring against him in order to try to FRAME HIM for a fake "crime".

Strange to see you take the words of those involved in a political coup over the guy they were trying to overthrow. And then blame the victim for not believing them while they're trying. But then again, seeing as it's you, it's not so strange.
 
Or like Michael Avenatti or AOC! I agree! In that respect Perez comes across as an extremely annoying wussy whiner, I admit. He's not a media star.

Some of those Congress people get on my nerves. I was really looking forward to the Family Separation hearings. I wanted to see someone rip those people a new asshole. Instead, there was just this droning woman from Colorado who acted about as passionate as doing her laundry. Thanks for NOTHING.

On the other hand, Mayor Pete is doing a fantastic job telling Trump to shove it, without being in your face. He totally has Trump's number and Trump knows it. In fact Trump came out the other day saying he's in favor of gay marriage and "likes" seeing Pete onstage--which to me was a clear signal he's afraid of Pete and knows his usual bullying will completely not work on him.


Thank you for responding. My thought is that I would like to see someone more vocal and animated like Howard Dean to respond to Trump.
 
Last edited:
Or, you know, Trump said he doesn't trust the then admin's intelligence community. Which we NOW KNOW was conspiring against him in order to try to FRAME HIM for a fake "crime".

Strange to see you take the words of those involved in a political coup over the guy they were trying to overthrow. And then blame the victim for not believing them while they're trying. But then again, seeing as it's you, it's not so strange.

Save your propaganda bullshit for someone gullible enough to believe it
 
The rest of the world saw it, you must have been reaching climax.

When asked about Russian meddling in our 2016 election, he took the word of KGB Colonel Putin over the entire US intelligence community. It was humiliating and depressing to REAL Americans to witness the President of the US capitulate to the Russian scumbag

Can you show any proof that "the entire US intelligence community" is or was of that opinion?

Here is someone who isn't: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...oke-no-fire-no-russia-trump-collusion-n734176
 
Last edited:
I note that the Times is only citing anon. persons who were under Obama. Do you have anything current?

The evidence is out there if you're inclined to be non-partisan. I'm not someone who is going to run around the net searching for evidence you won't accept because you're extremely partisan.

I can see that you're someone who needs to get the last word so, go ahead junior
 
~when did the cash bribe thing come up? ~
http://www.clintoncashbook.com/
https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/61z0YBgRO-L._AC_SY400_.jpg


Politifact, at its level best to parrot HRC campaign spin https://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/apr/26/peter-schweizer/fact-checking-clinton-cash-author-claim-about-bill/had to conclude: "
Hillary Clinton’s financial disclosure forms from 2001 through the end of 2012 confirm Schweizer’s claim. We rate it True."
 
Can you show any proof that "the entire US intelligence community" is or was of that opinion?

Here is someone who isn't: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...oke-no-fire-no-russia-trump-collusion-n734176

Let’s try an article with Morell’s views now, shall we?

In a rare interview Tuesday, President Trump's son-in-law and adviser Jared Kushner characterized Russian interference in the 2016 election as a "couple of Facebook ads" and suggested that the investigation into it was more harmful to American democracy than the meddling itself. Former acting director of the CIA Michael Morell disputed that characterization on "CBS This Morning" Wednesday and said Kushner was attempting to "downplay" Russia's "significant and extensive interference."
"We're talking about ads that reached over 100 million people," Morell said, adding that the attempts to influence the 2016 presidential election included a range of activities from handing over stolen information to WikiLeaks, to trying to get inside voting systems and using overt media to spread disinformation in addition to social media.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/kushne...-certainly-coming-for-2020-ex-cia-chief-says/
 

So in essence Kushner said the Russian ad campaign was equivalent to a single billboard next to a highway. Morrell's view is that the lone billboard is seen by millions of commuters.

Which STILL doesn't change the fact that the ads were nothing more than the equivalent of a single billboard next to a highway.

Try thinking. For once.
 
Back
Top