Abortion

Not bigotry at all. I don't believe for one second any of this Pro-"Life" B.S.

These people all have some twisted fucked up reason for wanting to punish women. Matt thinks all his MAGIC SEED could be wiped out. July is obviously a Christian Cult Member. And Kuntarri, I belueve, is resentful of those humans who are what he can only pretend to be.

JMO!

I believe you wanna fuck me and you are upset I won’t give you the time or day.
 
Last edited:
I bet that guy has a closet full of coat hangers with skeletons on the floor.

Yeah, moron. And now they don't have safe access to a medical procedure. Abortions will not decrease but the chances of the mother surviving a back alley abortion will.
 
Yeah, moron. And now they don't have safe access to a medical procedure. Abortions will not decrease but the chances of the mother surviving a back alley abortion will.

Most medical procedures aren't specifically employed to kill someone. Rule No.1: Do no harm.
 
Governor Kay Ivey Verified Account
@GovernorKayIvey

Today, I signed into law the Alabama Human Life Protection Act.

2:56 PM - 15 May 2019 from Montgomery, AL

Judd Legum Verified Account
@JuddLegum Replying to @GovernorKayIvey
@BCBSAssociation and 9 others

3. Here are the corporations backing @GovernorKayIvey,
who signed the ban into law @BCBSAssociation
(BlueCross) (75K) @ATT (113K) @LillyPad (30K)
@StateFarm (10K) @Boeing (10K) @Walmart (7K)
@CocaCola (10K) @exxonmobil (5K) @comcast (21K)
@pfizer (5K)

5:35 AM - 16 May 2019

The effort was spearheaded by Alabama's Republican leadership:
Speaker Mac McCutcheon, Majority Leader Nathaniel Ledbetter,
Senate President (and Lt. Governor) Will Ainsworth,
and Majority Leader Greg Reed.

The bill was sponsored by a Republican Senator, Clyde Chambliss.

Judd Legum Verified Account
@JuddLegum Replying to
@ATT @exxonmobil and 12 others

2. Here is the list of corporations backing the legislative leaders
behind the abortion ban: @ATT @exxonmobil @pfizer @Walmart
@Boeing @StateFarm @LillyPad @CaterpillarInc @KochIndustries
@DraftKings @AltriaNews @comcast @CVSHealth @AnheuserBusch

(link)
5:33 AM - 16 May 2019

The corporations backing Alabama's war on women

https://popular.info/p/the-corporations-backing-alabamas

Koch Industries, run by the supposedly libertarian Koch brothers,
donated $2,500 to Ainsworth, $1,500 to Chambliss,
$1,500 to Ledbetter, and $2,000 to Reed.

Liberty for me, not for thee, embryo carrier!
 
Yeah, moron. And now they don't have safe access to a medical procedure. Abortions will not decrease but the chances of the mother surviving a back alley abortion will.

Oh look. Someone else that needs childish name calling to communicate.
 
I insult you with facts. Got it.

Your facts would insult anyone’s intelligence more so than Luk’s communication skills.
Sorry, gotta refer to you in third person. Seems the only format your primitive brain will understand.
 
The world's most prolific abortionist: God.

He kills people with gravity as well. Just because people can fall to their death doesn't mean that you are on the side of the angels when you shove someone off a cliff.

Neither God in general North specifically a Christian God is required to have a moral objection to the abhorrent practice of dismembering a living feeling human being just because it hasn't taken a breath yet.

You are aware that there are people who have objections to any animal being killed for any reason right? God kills far more animals than humans ever will. Does that make them Christian fundamentalist when they have moral objections to what they view to be barbaric practices?

Plenty of atheists are capable of forming moral judgments without any help from God. Admittedly, Godless Democrats are over-represented in the contingent who would describe a parent's grief at a miscarriage or a stillbirth as a non-event occurring to a meaningless collection of cells.

There is no historical, scientific, moral, theological, or psychological support for the position.

Labeling it a choice does not address the moral issues being raised. There is no other moral issue that anyone gets to dismiss valid objections with the insistence that they have the right to make an immoral choice. You have to either argue successfully that this choice is actually moral or you have to argue that morality is not a thing. Just calling it a choice and saying you don't have to justify it is ridiculous.

We put people in jail all the time for choices they make. We go so far as executing people for their choices.

If you can't make a valid argument against society having a moral foundation to law for that the choice you want to make is in fact moral you have no argument.

And yes, I am addressing the full range of argument in favor of vivisection of humans including people not really worth quoting or individually addressing on the subject.
 
Last edited:
LOL @ people who believe in god.

LMAO @ people who think they can have a rational discussion about a fairy tale.
 
He kills people with gravity as well. Just because people can fall to their death doesn't mean that you are on the side of the angels when you shove someone off a cliff.

Neither God in general North specifically a Christian God is required to have a moral objection to the abhorrent practice of dismembering a living feeling human being just because it hasn't taken a breath yet.

You are aware that there are people who have objections to any animal being killed for any reason right? God kills far more animals than humans ever will. Does that make them Christian fundamentalist when they have moral objections to what they view to be barbaric practices?

Plenty of atheists are capable of forming moral judgments without any help from God. Admittedly, Godless Democrats are over-represented in the contingent who would describe a parent's grief at a miscarriage or a stillbirth as a non-event occurring to a meaningless collection of cells.

There is no historical, scientific, moral, theological, or psychological support for the position.

Labeling it a choice does not address the moral issues being raised. There is no other moral issue that anyone gets to dismiss valid objections with the insistence that they have the right to make an immoral choice. You have to either argue successfully that this choice is actually moral or you have to argue that morality is not a thing. Just calling it a choice and saying you don't have to justify it is ridiculous.

We put people in jail all the time for choices they make. We go so far as executing people for their choices.

If you can't make a valid argument against society having a moral foundation to law for that the choice you want to make is in fact moral you have no argument.

And yes, I am addressing the full range of argument in favor of vivisection of humans including people not really worth quoting or individually addressing on the subject.

Gravity is just a theory.
 
LOL @ people who believe in god.

LMAO @ people who think they can have a rational discussion about a fairy tale.

Lol at the idiot that cannot follow a logical train of thought. I just explained why moral questions are moral questions separate and apart from any theological mooring.
 
Lol at the idiot that cannot follow a logical train of thought. I just explained why moral questions are moral questions separate and apart from any theological mooring.

If you spoke to him in 3rd person, he might comprehend what you’re saying.
 
LOL @ people who believe in god.

LMAO @ people who think they can have a rational discussion about a fairy tale.

Descartes is considered the Father of Metaphysics because of his Mind & Body problem. When Descartes did this, formalized the mind/body prob, what he was doing was trying to explain the concept of God to Empiricists who didn't understand the "one type of substance" these Rationalist kept referring to as their Universal Axiom.

Epistemology boils down to apriori vs posteriori, or theism vs atheism, or Plato's form vs Aristotle's form & matter, or p vs np. (There's lots of ways you can think about it.)

It's true, believing in God is an absurdity. But if you don't believe in God and continue down the Empirical path, you run into 3 hard absurdities where you have to "make a leap of faith" x3. Therefore, to not believe in God requires more belief.

Don't get me wrong, everybody has their role to play in this grand narrative. It's just a bit hypocritical for a person who doesn't believe in God to make fun of others for having beliefs.
 
Back
Top