Abortion

That's the 'It's not OK unless I say it's OK' philosophy.

To me, there are only two, maybe three people that should even know, let alone decide. The patient, the doctor and in some cases, maybe the partner.

Definitely never the Church or any activists. The Government only to the extent of mandating that medical safety guidelines be followed, the same as any other licensing and safety issue for any part of medicine.

That’s your philosophy. I only offered up my personal opinions, not meant to be the “law of the land” in any way.

Now that you’ve shared your opinions, wouldn’t you agree there are other options - like putting the child up for adoption rather than terminating the life? I mean, there are thousands of couples in this world unable to have children who would adopt if given the opportunity.

On the other hand, there are couples who have children that shouldn’t, but they do.

So is abortion the only answer we should support?
🐾Kant
 
A fetus is not a human being.

Period.

All your hand wringing and junk science will not change that.

Don't want an abortion? Don't have one.

That's called choice.

Take your morality out of someone else's uterus
 
Now that you’ve shared your opinions, wouldn’t you agree there are other options - like putting the child up for adoption rather than terminating the life?

Again, only two, maybe three people should be involved in that decision.

No one else's decision or opinion is relevant.
 
Man, you are just stupid dumb. Your thoughts and the way you deliver them are just, wow.. Sorry, I'm really not meaning to name call, but it's so unfortunate for you. I empathize.

Thanks you for your opinion. The feeling is mutual with the exception I don’t pity you.

To paraphrase Gandalf here: “Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For even the very wise cannot see all ends.
🐾Kant
 
That’s your philosophy. I only offered up my personal opinions, not meant to be the “law of the land” in any way.

Now that you’ve shared your opinions, wouldn’t you agree there are other options - like putting the child up for adoption rather than terminating the life? I mean, there are thousands of couples in this world unable to have children who would adopt if given the opportunity.

On the other hand, there are couples who have children that shouldn’t, but they do.

So is abortion the only answer we should support?
🐾Kant

Yes, there are options. And abortion is one of them.

Carry the fetus to term. Put it up for adoption. Have an abortion

These are choices aka pro-choice

Adoption is funded through medical programs and social security, and historically conservative governments have always gutted adoption programs

Its mind boggling, they don't want women to be allowed to chose what they can do with their bodies and then want to ensure the child has a shitty future
 
Thanks you for your opinion. The feeling is mutual with the exception I don’t pity you.

To paraphrase Gandalf here: “Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For even the very wise cannot see all ends.
🐾Kant

A fetus is not a person
 
A fetus is not a human being.

Period.

All your hand wringing and junk science will not change that.

Don't want an abortion? Don't have one.

That's called choice.

Take your morality out of someone else's uterus

This has my vote for being the dumbest shit I have read all morning. So if a fetus isn’t a human being, then is it a dog, a cat, a fish, a bird or some other non sentient life form?
 
This has my vote for being the dumbest shit I have read all morning. So if a fetus isn’t a human being, then is it a dog, a cat, a fish, a bird or some other non sentient life form?
She's a degenerate piece of shit.
 
A fetus is not a person

So explain at what point does a fetus become a person. When the unbliical chord is cut - when it has a heartbeat or whe it starts paying taxes. Pretty much everyone will agree without a heart beat, there is no life. To terminate a fetus with a heartbeat - that’s pretty much playing God, deciding who lives and who dies.
 
Adoption is funded through medical programs and social security, and historically conservative governments have always gutted adoption programs

Its mind boggling, they don't want women to be allowed to chose what they can do with their bodies and then want to ensure the child has a shitty future

And if they're forced to keep and raise (facilities ordered closed or restricted), the w(R)ongs don't want to provide funds to help them live and grow up. (You had it, you pay for it!)
 
Back
Top