Trump Tax Figures Show Over $1 Billion in Business Losses

[spacekowboy]

Lay off the sharpie huffing, bro. It's rotting your brain.

 

[bbx56]

so does this mean

"they" couldnt find

haircuts from 60 yrs ago

to bash him on?

axin

for

A

friend

 

[Rightguide]

BTW, all of this information was already made public by Trump himself in his book, The Art of The Comeback.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Hate, hate, hate.

8 Years of half the country hating the mulatto president, now the other half of the country hates the old white new york huckster.

Good times.

Both-sides-ism.

 

[chillywilly2]

BTW, all of this information was already made public by Trump himself in his book, The Art of The Comeback.

Did he make any money on that book?

 

[Rightguide]

Did he make any money on that book?

What difference does it make?

 

[chillywilly2]

What difference does it make?

Well it just might restore my faith in him

 

[Luk]

What difference does it make?

Because you dumbfucks elected him because you were fooled into thinking he is a good businessman and it's quite fucking obvious that he most certainly is not.

 

[Adre]

Looks like New York is going to let Congress see Good Brain’s state tax returns.

 

[oralaccents]

Both-sides-ism.

Godamned Ismlamics.

 

[phrodeau]

We're so lucky to have such a man in high office, creating jobs so we can all be just like him.

 

[Counselor706]

It seems like only yesterday...

When the 'New York Times' called Trump 'the comeback kid'

 

[HisArpy]

Again, I didn't say anyone was good (nor did I imply it).

And the discussion that you initiated by jumping in wasn't about "Trump's bankruptcy filing or tax data information." It's not my fault if you're too stupid to understand what is being discussed. Go back and read the entire exchange again.

And for the record, I think Trump lying about things like Russian contacts with his campaign staff, obstruction and illegal immigrants voting in elections (to name just a few of his lies) are indeed far worse than Elizabeth Warren misrepresenting the percentage of her indian heritage.

Uh huh.

Tell me, how exactly do you go from "Trump tax figures show..." to "It's not about Trump's tax data information" without skipping over more than a few of the major pieces of the discussion topic?

Please try to keep up.

 

[zipman]

Uh huh.

Tell me, how exactly do you go from "Trump tax figures show..." to "It's not about Trump's tax data information" without skipping over more than a few of the major pieces of the discussion topic?

Please try to keep up.

Context is important. Such as what were the posts discussing when you jumped headlong into the conversation to deflect any criticism from Trump.

Go back and read it again before I make you look like even more of an idiot than I already have.

 

[HisArpy]

Context is important. Such as what were the posts discussing when you jumped headlong into the conversation to deflect any criticism from Trump.

Go back and read it again before I make you look like even more of an idiot than I already have.

dudly, the fact that you seem to believe that ONLY your interpretation of the discussion is what matters is where you fail.

Again.

Please try to keep up with the rest of the class.

 

[zipman]

dudly, the fact that you seem to believe that ONLY your interpretation of the discussion is what matters is where you fail.

Again.

Please try to keep up with the rest of the class.

Okay moron, I gave you opportunity to be something other than a moron. It isn't about my interpretation, it's about what was actually said.

It started with Jomar saying this:

Trump supporters don’t want to know about his history of fleecing others and putting people out of business because he decides not to pay what he owes. They want to believe he actually knows what he’s doing while dismissing his ever constant lying.

It wasn't about "Trump tax figures show..." to "It's not about Trump's tax data information" as you asserted.

Then A_J gave the following idiotic reply:

The same can be said about the Clintons...

Even Bernie...


Who's you "scammer?"

Who, in your mind, has no clue as to how to work the system and would be,
as such, a perfect leader?

To which I replied asking for examples:

Really? Then you should have absolutely no problem finding some actual examples to prove that they did it on the same scale as he did.

Because there are tons of stories of Trump screwing over people by not paying his debts.

I'll wait. Or is this like the "there are illegal aliens are voting in the millions" bullshit?

Here's when your moronic ass jumped into the conversation with your preposterous ascription in the form of a question that I was somehow saying that Dems were good:

Wait, so your argument is that the Dems are good because they didn't fuck over their fellow Americans as much as Trump did?

Now, how fucking stupid are you that you can't follow a conversation that you are participating in?

Maybe you should spend more time reading and trying to understand what is actually being said before you jump in to deflect criticism away from the lying, cheating asshole-in-chief.

At least give a try for a change.

 

[chillywilly2]

Well shit

Just got around to reading the story...if this ain't fake news I don't know what is.

you guys will argue about anything

 

[Luk]

Poor Rapey. He's having a terrible week and it's barely Wednesday

 

[von_Bismarck]

Expecting Derpy (or Que, for that matter) to read for context is never gonna go out well.

 

[cleaver]

of course, the kernel of truth in this story
will not be understood until historians in the future
are doing the post mortem on this era
and it's players...

invective and polemics cloud the contemporary air.

what these future historians will discern
is that trump was actually an awful businessman.

it was indeed the bankers who,
faced with the prospect of liquidating the bankruptcies of the individual
found more of value in propping up the brand
he had begun to create
than could be recovered from the property.

trump was reorganized by the banks; actually put on an allowance...
and allowed to grow his brand to recover for the lenders...

that he could, once somewhat solvent, shake those chains is...
the interesting part.

but of course, any such open disclosure is detrimental to the brand....
(i.e. the product)
and to the puppet masters - in the big buildings in ny he don't really own.

it is all smoke and mirrors...
would have truly undercut the apprentice days...

which he no longer needs to rely upon.

trump is actually a golem.
qed

 

[Rightguide]

Bezos, Buffet, and Zuckerberg, have all lost billions in a single day but we haven't seen the board's liberals wetting their pants about those loses.

 

[Luk]

Bezos, Buffet, and Zuckerberg, have all lost billions in a single day but we haven't seen the board's liberals wetting their pants about those loses.

LAWLZ!

If you don't the difference between those 3 and 45, you should never talk economics ever again, vettebirther.

 

[zipman]

Expecting Derpy (or Que, for that matter) to read for context is never gonna go out well.

I gave him every opportunity to go back and reread the exchange.

He preferred to continue to engage in stupidity.

 

[zipman]

Bezos, Buffet, and Zuckerberg, have all lost billions in a single day but we haven't seen the board's liberals wetting their pants about those loses.

They lost billions in a day due to rapid drops in stock prices, not failed business ventures.

Big difference.

 

[BotanyBoy]

They lost billions in a day due to rapid drops in stock prices, not failed business ventures.

Big difference.

Bezos and Buffet did quite a bit of failing before they make it at their current gigs.

Most people do.

Zuckerberg is the exception.