LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Climate continues to change.

Status
Not open for further replies.
OldJourno said:
Have you heard the good climate news about the Green New Deal?
We already know it would destroy the U.S. economy, but it would be worth it because the world would be habitable in a dirt-poor socialist sort of way.
Right?

"Notwithstanding the assertions from GND proponents that it is an essential policy to confront purportedly adverse climate phenomena," writes Benjamin Zycher of the American Enterprise Institute, "the future temperature impacts of the zero-emissions objective would be barely distinguishable from zero: 0.173°C by 2100, under the maximum Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change parameter (equilibrium climate sensitivity) about the effects of reduced GHG emissions."
He adds, "Under an assumption consistent with the findings reported in the recent peer-reviewed literature, the effect would be 0.083°C by 2100."

Kinda makes you feel warm all over, doesn't it?
So tell us again, Phro and gang, what exactly should we do and what will it accomplish.
Click to expand...
Sounds like it’s far too late to make any difference. Diagnosed decades ago, but effective treatment was refused.
 
von_Bismarck said:
Do let us know when you intend to participate constructively, Qeew. Until then, I'll note your hypocrisy whenever you chastise anyone for lack of substance.
Click to expand...

"Us?" You have no "off-board bros." No one interacts with obvious alts on an meaningful level.
 
phrodeau said:
Sounds like it’s far too late to make any difference. Diagnosed decades ago, but effective treatment was refused.
Click to expand...

"Decades ago?"

Do you mean back when the consensus was we were all going to freeze to death unless we did *something*?
 
von_Bismarck said:
Did you lose visitation, again, and that's why you're so cranky? :(
Click to expand...

Feeling especially butthurt? Is that why you feel the need to make up random stories in true RDS style involving other people's children?

Remember when you so sullied RDS that you started using this series of alts to start over?

Time to start over again, chum. Nobody likes you.
 
Que said:
Feeling especially butthurt? Is that why you feel the need to make up random stories in true RDS style involving other people's children?

Remember when you so sullied RDS that you started using this series of alts to start over?

Time to start over again, chum. Nobody likes you.
Click to expand...

It's impressive, in a way, that you're still pushing the idea that I'm Rob. A smarter man would have learned from his mistakes, after he tried to pin me as KingOrfeo.

Your time would be better spent trying not to lose contracts.
 
Know how to tell when a right winger gets frustrated? Lesson clearly demonstrated above. Try to stay on topic.
 
Que said:
It took you that long to Google-up something authoritative-sounding to demonstrate how well versed you totally are in scientific theory?

Well worth the wait, I'm sure.

Where's the part about consensus-building being an integral part of totally sciencing the shit outta facts?
Click to expand...

And yes, consensus building is absolutely an activity of science. It happens at conferences and through journal publications, when one scientist tries to convince the community of the validity of their results. And it happens with research proposals, otherwise how could the millions or billions of dollars be put together for industrial-level science. Just two basic examples.
 
von_Bismarck said:
It's impressive, in a way, that you're still pushing the idea that I'm Rob. A smarter man would have learned from his mistakes, after he tried to pin me as KingOrfeo.

Your time would be better spent trying not to lose contracts.
Click to expand...

It's odd how Queew picked that particular hill as the one he wants to die on.
 
von_Bismarck said:
And yes, consensus building is absolutely an activity of science. It happens at conferences and through journal publications, when one scientist tries to convince the community of the validity of their results. And it happens with research proposals, otherwise how could the millions or billions of dollars be put together for industrial-level science. Just two basic examples.
Click to expand...

You're describing the popularity contest model that had evolved. Not scientific method.

Scientific method involves developing a theory and tests that repeatably prove (or disprove) the hypothesis.

Then you publish it, others repeat your experiments and build upon it until someone finds an exception.

Only no such process has happened in the arena of climate scamology. Sorry, I mean climate change science!
 
gunthernehmen said:
You're describing the popularity contest model that had evolved. Not scientific method.

Scientific method involves developing a theory and tests that repeatably prove (or disprove) the hypothesis.

Then you publish it, others repeat your experiments and build upon it until someone finds an exception.

Only no such process has happened in the arena of climate scamology. Sorry, I mean climate change science!
Click to expand...

You have a cartoon-level understanding of scientific activity. Which would be forgivable, except you've shown no inclination to learn. There is a difference between ideal science, and science as it is actually practiced by the community.
 
gunthernehmen said:
You're describing the popularity contest model that had evolved. Not scientific method.

Scientific method involves developing a theory and tests that repeatably prove (or disprove) the hypothesis.

Then you publish it, others repeat your experiments and build upon it until someone finds an exception.

Only no such process has happened in the arena of climate scamology. Sorry, I mean climate change science!
Click to expand...

^^^^^^Definitely a Climate Change Denialist Shitbag.
 
Look who pulled his head far enough out of his ass to see that other people are posting.

von skidmark has awoken, from his terminal case of cranial rectalitis, combined with rectal glaucoma!

von_Bismarck said:
^ Look who finally made it in on the short bus! 👍
Click to expand...
 
Klinkster said:
Look who pulled his head far enough out of his ass to see that other people are posting.

von skidmark has awoken, from his terminal case of cranial rectalitis, combined with rectal glaucoma!
Click to expand...

He hasn't been the same since his sphincter put him in a choke hold. :D
 
gunthernehmen said:
You're describing the popularity contest model that had evolved. Not scientific method.

Scientific method involves developing a theory and tests that repeatably prove (or disprove) the hypothesis.

Then you publish it, others repeat your experiments and build upon it until someone finds an exception.

Only no such process has happened in the arena of climate scamology. Sorry, I mean climate change science!
Click to expand...
Sounds like a popularity contest to me.
 
von_Bismarck said:
You have a cartoon-level understanding of scientific activity. Which would be forgivable, except you've shown no inclination to learn. There is a difference between ideal science, and science as it is actually practiced by the community.
Click to expand...

What's kind of scary is you really seem to be buying your own von BS.

I'm always open to learning, but you have yet to prove you have anything to teach.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

P
NOAA: Carbon Dioxide in Atmosphere Reaches Highest Level in Millions of Years
Replies
5
Views
72
Saint_Ann
Saint_Ann
P
Trump administration set to shutter iconic research center in New York
Replies
1
Views
83
Politruk
P
Rightguide
“Climate Change” Hoax Needs to Be Removed From All U.S. Education Books
7 8 9
Replies
218
Views
3K
Politruk
P
P
Trump causes scientists to flee the U.S.
2 3
Replies
59
Views
1K
MajorRewrite
M
SugarDaddy1
The next big climate scare: Counting climate change deaths
Replies
1
Views
208
Fuzzy1975
F
Back
Top