75% Of New February Jobs Were In LIBERAL California

[TontoedRanger]

Yes. Exactly. We'll have a huge mess to clean in the future, in so many areas besides economy and jobs.

Thank you Skye Obama left a big mess didn't he?

 

[bbx56]

https://trofire.com/2019/04/05/75-of-new-february-jobs-were-in-liberal-california/

must be

all the hiring

of "people"

to pick

up the SHIT

left by

the

homless in

SF

 

[Counselor706]

https://trofire.com/2019/04/05/75-of-new-february-jobs-were-in-liberal-california/

"You could just as easily look at January and ask why California's 5,900-job gain was so small relative to the nation's 311,000 job gain."

 

[Luk]

"You could just as easily look at January and ask why California's 5,900-job gain was so small relative to the nation's 311,000 job gain."

Job gains are a bad thing

 

[TontoedRanger]

https://pics.me.me/youre-complaining-about-not-having-a-job-ker-but-vou-5502190.png

 

[TontoedRanger]

Fucking spammers.

https://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/6/67330/2087781-mini_me_intro.jpg

 

[Adre]

Obama is the first president to never achieve a year of 3% GDP growth.

And the first President to be handed such a piece of shit economy with a total collapse of banks, brokerages, and real estate.

 

[TontoedRanger]

And the first President to be handed such a piece of shit economy with a total collapse of banks, brokerages, and real estate.

 

[BotanyBoy]

And the first President to be handed such a piece of shit economy with a total collapse of banks, brokerages, and real estate.

Jesus Christ LOL.....

 

[TontoedRanger]

Jesus Christ LOL.....

Did you bring a 1st aid kit? Give that guy some pain killers pls.

 

[Counselor706]

And the first President to be handed such a piece of shit economy with a total collapse of banks, brokerages, and real estate.

Barney Frank 'fesses up on financial crisis

Frank's fingerprints are all over the financial fiasco

 

[Boxlicker101]

https://trofire.com/2019/04/05/75-of-new-february-jobs-were-in-liberal-california/

Not that big a deal. There were only 20,000 new jobs in the country, so 15,000 of them were I'm CA. Jan. and March were much bigger. How did CA do in those months?

 

[Boxlicker101]

Obama is the first president to never achieve a year of 3% GDP growth.

That's especially bad, considering he had such a low starting point, thanks to the Franks-Dodd recession.

 

[Boxlicker101]

must be

all the hiring

of "people"

to pick

up the SHIT

left by

the

homless in

SF

And that literally includes shit. Or fecal matter, if you want to be more polite.

 

[InsightRiot]

David Packman, he a republican never Trumper. It's amazing how the left loves establishment GOP.

 

[Dribble]

I know math isn't required for Republicans. But I am curious. If you take the stock market on Donald Duck's inaugural day...that is the value Obama gave him. So if you subtract from that value, what the stock market was on Obama's inaugural day, you can easily calculate the percentage of increase (which is if you are interested in making money...all that matters.) Now you can do the same for Donald. Even if you adjust this for time in office...why is the rate of increase so much larger for Obama?

 

[Dribble]

I dont know what I am missing...+148% for Obama, +22% Donald Duck.

 

[Dribble]

And since I know math is not the forte of Republicans, they can also Google "Dow Jones stock market return by president" and the math is done for them.

 

[Ann_Tagonist]

Highest cost of living just below the islands of Hawaii and Washington D.C.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Not everything is rosy in California!

Last night Trump flew into Beverly Hills for one of his first forays into enemy territory. A Republican fundraiser for Trump 2020 hosted by health-care moguls. Less than 50 people showed up.

 

[Ann_Tagonist]

How many moguls does it take to change a lightbulb...I mean an election?

 

[RobDownSouth]

How many moguls does it take to change a lightbulb...I mean an election?

Not many. I think Trump had Sheldon Adelson handling the right wing Israeli assistance, the Koch brothers handling the domestic vote suppression efforts and Putin's billionaire buddy (whose name I can't pronounce let alone spell) handling the opposition trashing.

 

[HisArpy]

I know math isn't required for Republicans. But I am curious. If you take the stock market on Donald Duck's inaugural day...that is the value Obama gave him. So if you subtract from that value, what the stock market was on Obama's inaugural day, you can easily calculate the percentage of increase (which is if you are interested in making money...all that matters.) Now you can do the same for Donald. Even if you adjust this for time in office...why is the rate of increase so much larger for Obama?

I dont know what I am missing...+148% for Obama, +22% Donald Duck.

The stock market is not the sole indicator of the health of any specific national economy since it also includes foreign/offshore investments and fails to include other meaningful indicators such as median incomes and employment statistics.

Without those, and other indices, being included the market is a horrible bellweather for trying to prove whether any nation's economy is good or not. For instance, if one nation's economy is collapsing and another's is relatively stable, the market will move money from the unstable to the stable and there will be a resulting increase in value of the market as a whole since the new offshore investment opportunities are more desirable than the current national ones thus driving up the price of the investments. Which shows as an increase in the market despite the national economy being in the dumps.

But you didn't see that. Instead you did what most idjits do, follow and quote the headlines as if by itself it's proof of something it's not.

Please try to keep up with the rest of the class in the future.

 

[BotanyBoy]

All those jobs, and only a micro% of them pay enough to not be totally fucking poor in California.

Which is still by a long shot #1 for poverty and homelessness.

 

[Dribble]

The stock market is not the sole indicator of the health of any specific national economy since it also includes foreign/offshore investments and fails to include other meaningful indicators such as median incomes and employment statistics.

Without those, and other indices, being included the market is a horrible bellweather for trying to prove whether any nation's economy is good or not. For instance, if one nation's economy is collapsing and another's is relatively stable, the market will move money from the unstable to the stable and there will be a resulting increase in value of the market as a whole since the new offshore investment opportunities are more desirable than the current national ones thus driving up the price of the investments. Which shows as an increase in the market despite the national economy being in the dumps.

But you didn't see that. Instead you did what most idjits do, follow and quote the headlines as if by itself it's proof of something it's not.

Please try to keep up with the rest of the class in the future.

So you support a liar and a con. Cant have it both ways...which is it? Lol.