Why Trump will win the wall fight

[TalkRadio1]

In the matter of the border wall, Congress could not have been more clear where it was heading. It has long put itself on the path to institutional irrelevancy, and it has finally arrived. While I do not agree that there is a national emergency on the southern border, I do believe President Trump will prevail. This crisis is not the making of Donald Trump. It is the making of Congress.

Curiously, Pelosi called for the declaration of a national emergency to deal with the “epidemic of gun violence in America.” She added that she wished Trump would add that declaration but that a “Democratic president can do that.” Yes, a Democratic president could, and that is the key point. Congress gave all presidents the power to make such declarations, and Pelosi is making the case for Trump.

That brings us back to Holmes. Congress has the authority to rescind the declaration of Trump with a vote of both chambers. It should do so. If it cannot muster the votes, however, a federal judge is unlikely to do so. Simply put, the courts were not created to protect Congress from itself. Congress has been heading to hell for decades, and it is a bit late to complain about the destination.

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/430335-why-trump-will-win-the-wall-fight

 

[Adre]

It does not matter, nor will it salvage his Presidency, which is sliding headlong into historical and laughable irrelevance. When bozos like Coulter and Hannity start to peel off, the end is nigh.

 

[HisArpy]

It does not matter, nor will it salvage his Presidency, which is sliding headlong into historical and laughable irrelevance. When bozos like Coulter and Hannity start to peel off, the end is nigh.

You are particularly confusing in your rhetoric.

You say that Trump is a "right wing fringe wacko" but when he sheds ACTUAL "right wing fringe wacko's" because he's not doing enough to please them, in your mind it's somehow a Trump failing rather than an observation that he's apparently not part of the "right wing wacko" ideology.

Very confusing. Unless you consider the possibility that it's not Trump that's the problem here.

 

[HisArpy]

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/430335-why-trump-will-win-the-wall-fight

It's a good article. Too bad most progressives won't read it.

 

[Adre]

You are particularly confusing in your rhetoric.

You say that Trump is a "right wing fringe wacko" but when he sheds ACTUAL "right wing fringe wacko's" because he's not doing enough to please them, in your mind it's somehow a Trump failing rather than an observation that he's apparently not part of the "right wing wacko" ideology.

Very confusing. Unless you consider the possibility that it's not Trump that's the problem here.

You being confused is not particularly surprising. He’s not right wing, he’s just a buffoon who appeals to the lunatic fringe. And when he stops appealing to them, he has little support left.

 

[HisArpy]

You being confused is not particularly surprising. He’s not right wing, he’s just a buffoon who appeals to the lunatic fringe. And when he stops appealing to them, he has little support left.

WAIT!

What about the "he didn't win the poplar vote" angle? Doesn't that mean he already doesn't have any support?

And how does "he's just a buffoon who appeals to the lunatic fringe" match up with the fact that the "lunatic fringe" isn't supporting him? Doesn't that mean that his support isn't from the "lunatic fringe"?

It's confusing when you switch around in your narrative like that. You should pick one and stick it.

**** edited to add ****

I meant stick TO it. Although sticking it works too.

 

[Adre]

Wow, I can see how you’re a big time attorney with these wicked cross exams.

 

[HisArpy]

Wow, I can see how you’re a big time attorney with these wicked cross exams.

Objection, move to strike, no question pending.

Objection sustained.

 

[phrodeau]

It does not matter, nor will it salvage his Presidency, which is sliding headlong into historical and laughable irrelevance. When bozos like Coulter and Hannity start to peel off, the end is nigh.

Coulter is "off the reservation," as our nationalist President put it, but he has moved to replace her with Rush Limbaugh in his celebrity cabinet.

 

[FGB]

WAIT!

What about the "he didn't win the poplar vote" angle? Doesn't that mean he already doesn't have any support?

And how does "he's just a buffoon who appeals to the lunatic fringe" match up with the fact that the "lunatic fringe" isn't supporting him? Doesn't that mean that his support isn't from the "lunatic fringe"?

It's confusing when you switch around in your narrative like that. You should pick one and stick it.

**** edited to add ****

I meant stick TO it. Although sticking it works too.

He didn't have any support in 2016 when he was elected and he probably won't have any in 2020 when he gets reelected.

Politics in this country is best taken with alcohol or weed!

 

[phrodeau]

Poplar vote? Do they caucus with the Ents? Is the Lorax in the Electoral College now?

 

[akatrex]

Idiot Liberal Judge will delay Trump.

Super Idiots on the 9th Circut will uphold Idiot Liberal Judge above.

U.S. Supreme Court will OVERTURN and TRUMP WINS!

Ninth Circuit Court rulings that were reviewed by the Supreme Court, 20% were affirmed, 19% were vacated, and 61% were reversed