National Emergencies .....

Shooting must involve at least one person being shot (not including the shooter)

Shooting must occur on school property, which includes but is not limited to buildings, fields, parking lots, stadiums and buses

We included gang violence, fights and domestic violence, but our count is not limited to those categories

We included the accidental discharge of a firearm as long as the first two parameters are met -- except when the sole shooter is a law enforcement or security officer


So the notion of the entire SCARE THOUGHT is BS


:rolleyes:
 
I've read you a little bit today and dirtbag seems to be your new vocabulary word of the day since everyone seems to be one...


:eek:
 
As is always the case, there are lies, there are damned lies, then there are statistics.
 
want me to go back to

Tried and True and Trusted name

of

:confused:NIGGER

AXING for a make believe friend:)
 
No!

What that was is

DECEPTION!

DISTORTION!

Let CNN do a story of how many BAD GUYS or how MANY CRIMES were stopped by Joe and Jane American EVERY DAY
 
There are certain actions Caesar can take that even the Praetorian guard can't save him from the consequences
 
The Dems will run screaming to the 9th Circus and I wonder if he will, as did a President past, ask which army was going to enforce their ruling...

After all, he has given the Praetorians their customary bonus.
 
The Dems will run screaming to the 9th Circus and I wonder if he will, as did a President past, ask which army was going to enforce their ruling...

After all, he has given the Praetorians their customary bonus.

He has the law and the Constitution on his side. The issue will be over whether the court agrees that it's a national emergency or not. The problem here is that if the court gets to define what is or isn't a national emergency then why have a presidency or congress at all? This is precisely the problem that Jefferson identified years ago. The possibility of primacy of the courts.
 
Too bad I can't read any of these responses. Each had previously earned my ignore because they have proven themselves to be racist pigs. I am sure they are in full denial mode. But facts are facts. A great leader, makes changes that saves lives. Building a wall does not do that. If the jobs are here, they will keep coming. Until you punish the employer...nothing will change. National security...lol...sure...I have land to sell in Florida...
 
Yes, there is that.


Merits and law now matter less than desired outcomes, a personal decision.
 
Too bad I can't read any of these responses. Each had previously earned my ignore because they have proven themselves to be racist pigs. I am sure they are in full denial mode. But facts are facts. A great leader, makes changes that saves lives. Building a wall does not do that. If the jobs are here, they will keep coming. Until you punish the employer...nothing will change. National security...lol...sure...I have land to sell in Florida...

*chuckle*


If he's put us all on ignore, why does he continue to lecture us?

Attempting to secure his spot on the bench? (another double meaning)
 
Too bad I can't read any of these responses. Each had previously earned my ignore because they have proven themselves to be racist pigs. I am sure they are in full denial mode. But facts are facts. A great leader, makes changes that saves lives. Building a wall does not do that. If the jobs are here, they will keep coming. Until you punish the employer...nothing will change. National security...lol...sure...I have land to sell in Florida...

what a jackass

why did

CuntClinton

DickClitman

NiggerHO

half the DUM Senators all vote for and advocate for a WALL
 
The Dems will run screaming to the 9th Circus and I wonder if he will, as did a President past, ask which army was going to enforce their ruling...

After all, he has given the Praetorians their customary bonus.

He has the law and the Constitution on his side. The issue will be over whether the court agrees that it's a national emergency or not. The problem here is that if the court gets to define what is or isn't a national emergency then why have a presidency or congress at all? This is precisely the problem that Jefferson identified years ago. The possibility of primacy of the courts.

It would be interesting to see what would happen if Trump declared Martial law in a specified and well defined "zone" alone the border at the same time he declared a National Emergency.

What do you think the 9th would/could do?

Or, if he declared a National Emergency only along a specific section of the border outside the 9th circuit's jurisdictional area? Maybe only in Texas and NM. In order to limit the impact on US citizens and their Constitutional Rights...
 
February, 2021: President Kamala Harris declares a national emergency against global warming...
 
It would be interesting to see what would happen if Trump declared Martial law in a specified and well defined "zone" alone the border at the same time he declared a National Emergency.

What do you think the 9th would/could do?

Or, if he declared a National Emergency only along a specific section of the border outside the 9th circuit's jurisdictional area? Maybe only in Texas and NM. In order to limit the impact on US citizens and their Constitutional Rights...

Did the left go bonkers over this Obama "national emergency?":D

" President Barack Obama on Wednesday issued an executive order freezing U.S. assets of anyone considered to be threatening the success of the U.S.-backed political transition in Yemen.

In the order, Mr. Obama declares a national emergency with respect to "actions and policies of certain members of the government of Yemen, and others threatening peace, security or stability by obstructing implementation of last year's political transition agreement."

In an accompanying note to Congress, he says the order does not target the entire country or its government, but those obstructing a transition "that meets the legitimate demands and aspirations of the Yemeni people for change."

The U.S. Treasury Department gets authority to freeze U.S.-based assets of anyone, "including political or military leaders of entities," obstructing implementation."

https://www.voanews.com/a/sanctions-us-yemen-democracy/666872.html
 
February, 2021: President Kamala Harris declares a national emergency against global warming...

And then does what?

What's the end goal? Where's the threat specifically coming from? What Depts of the Administration are to be used to combat this "emergency"? What's it going to cost? Will there be any infringements upon enumerated Constitutional Rights? Would there be a specific period of time before the "emergency" is over?

A "National Emergency" declaration is to stabilize an issue, not change policy absent an Act of Congress. Building a "wall" stabilizes the border and enforces existing laws until the existing problems are mitigated/resolved, or Congress acts.

Declaring Global Warming an emergency does nothing except usurp power. But, I guess your fart fantasy President Harris could always deploy FEMA and their trailers across the US.
 
Did the left go bonkers over this Obama "national emergency?":D

" President Barack Obama on Wednesday issued an executive order freezing U.S. assets of anyone considered to be threatening the success of the U.S.-backed political transition in Yemen.

In the order, Mr. Obama declares a national emergency with respect to "actions and policies of certain members of the government of Yemen, and others threatening peace, security or stability by obstructing implementation of last year's political transition agreement."

In an accompanying note to Congress, he says the order does not target the entire country or its government, but those obstructing a transition "that meets the legitimate demands and aspirations of the Yemeni people for change."

The U.S. Treasury Department gets authority to freeze U.S.-based assets of anyone, "including political or military leaders of entities," obstructing implementation."

https://www.voanews.com/a/sanctions-us-yemen-democracy/666872.html

I raised the issue of Martial Law because once it's declared there is no power that the courts can use against it. They have NO jurisdiction. (Nor does Congress.)

Like I said, it'd be interesting to see what would happen if Trump did that.
 
Trump currently announcing the NATIONAL EMERGENCY!


Right wingers as well as not right wingers :rolleyes: get their first boners of the new Millennium.

Trump and supporters..biggest idiots on the planet..
 
Trump currently announcing the NATIONAL EMERGENCY!


Right wingers as well as not right wingers :rolleyes: get their first boners of the new Millennium.

Trump and supporters..biggest idiots on the planet..

Incorrect, AOC and her fan club are setting new standards for stupidity. :D
 
Back
Top