Vegan And Vegetarians..
- Thread starter red_don
- Start date
A
AlliaPotestas
Guest
Yes, next question...
gentold
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2018
- Posts
- 5,253
I second that
mnbreastluver
Hands On Approach
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2013
- Posts
- 88,295
I think if you posted this on the general board you would get a lot of good answers. Some people are very knowledgeable over there. Good luck. 
Last edited:
done_got_old
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2003
- Posts
- 269,162
....................
Last edited:
Cymru6969
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2011
- Posts
- 22,109
lovetopleasewomen
81%er
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2012
- Posts
- 36,123
Vegans won't. For the same reason as they think drinking cows milk & eating honey will do harm to the cows & bees.
A
AlliaPotestas
Guest
Vegans won't. For the same reason as they think drinking cows milk & eating honey will do harm to the cows & bees.
It’s not quite the same... unless I start farming men... which might not be a bad idea
lovetopleasewomen
81%er
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2012
- Posts
- 36,123
It'd be easier & less expensive & less stressful to stick with vegetarians.It’s not quite the same... unless I start farming men... which might not be a bad idea
mnbreastluver
Hands On Approach
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2013
- Posts
- 88,295
To be honest, i was joking when i asked this question,lol
but i,m glad it got some people thinking
That’s great! Something I would have done. I was thinking wouldn’t the person that was cumming have to be a vegetarian as well or the semen would be already tainted.
Jada59
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2017
- Posts
- 23,941
Vegans won't. For the same reason as they think drinking cows milk & eating honey will do harm to the cows & bees.
Maybe some won't. I used to be a raw vegan. Not all vegans think the same.
lovetopleasewomen
81%er
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2012
- Posts
- 36,123
True.
lovetopleasewomen
81%er
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2012
- Posts
- 36,123
No. In no way, shape or form is drinking milk considered cannibalism.
greeneyedvirgin
Just Fork Me!
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2013
- Posts
- 12,263
The more vegans and vegetarians there are, the more bacon for me!!!!
Or did I read this thread wrong? Oh, well. Now I want bacon on a maple bar....
Or did I read this thread wrong? Oh, well. Now I want bacon on a maple bar....
mnbreastluver
Hands On Approach
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2013
- Posts
- 88,295
A
AlliaPotestas
Guest
No, next question?
Jada59
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2017
- Posts
- 23,941
Breast milk, maybe?
Not all but some vegans will not start their young on solid food for a very long time. They get only breast milk. Some will give them food but will continue to give breast milk until the age of 5 or more.
CandiCame
Rocket Grunt
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2011
- Posts
- 26,765
It’s not quite the same... unless I start farming men... which might not be a bad idea
There's a whole genre of porn dedicated to that and I, for one, support you on your endeavor.
Now that I've got that out of the way I want to answer this joke question seriously. Ethical veganism, at least, is about the principle of least suffering. Knowing how closely tied the meat and dairy industries are, the reasons that vegans abstain from all animal products is because boycotting factory farming and the cruelty it entails will not work if you half ass it. Egg production is cruel. Milk production is cruel and intrinsically tied to the meat industry, and in the US to the veal industry in particular. I actually think that the dairy industry is, in many ways, more harmful than the meat industry.
I was vegan for a while, but I couldn't sustain it financially, so now I consider myself a reducitarian. I do eat meat and dairy, but I do my best to source it ethically, without giving my money to factory farms. I don't always succeed, but it's one of those things where you kind of have to tell yourself that every little bit helps.
Swallowing cum doesn't contribute to suffering, like, at all. It doesn't really affect the principle of least suffering and therefore is a pretty offensive question that undermines the entire ideology.
And also that you hear about 5,000 times in the first week. So it's one of those jokes that just... people have heard it. A lot. And it's based on a principle of dietary veganism rather than ethical veganism, which is super rare? Most vegans/vegetarians are ethical vegans/vegetarians, not dietary vegans/vegetarians. There's a lot more to the mindset than just not eating meat to reduce animal suffering, it's also about reducing human suffering, to the point that a lot of humanists are also ethical vegans who lobby for sustainable agricultural practices to replace factory farming. It's a whole thing. There's absolutely no point in not eating meat if you're still going to have laws that exclude "livestock" and "pest" animals from animal cruelty laws. One of the reasons that many vegans use a rabbit as a symbol is because even in grain/other plant production under factory farming rabbits are commonly tortured to death (by using slow acting poisoning, completely lawless harvesting practices that result in them getting chopped up in machinery are the big two that come to mind), so even most plant-based foods produced in the US aren't technically vegan. The goal is an eventual shift to sustainable agricultural practices with an emphasis on both human and animal rights. Again, corn that is harvested by exploited people, sugar that is planted by child slaves, migrant workers who are held hostage and paid slave wages under threat of deportation- all that shit is vegan.
The goal is to achieve sustainable practices that cause the least amount of suffering to all parties involved. And that shit is important because it does affect things like literal slavery- there are over 30,000 slaves in the world today, and a lot of them work in agriculture, and a lot of them are children. Your bananas are also normally produced by child slaves- the Nestle corporation holds entire nations hostage because of a post-colonial hellscape in tropical places where chocolate is still farmed on goddamn slave plantations. So when vegans tell you that they don't eat chocolate, it's often not the milk in the chocolate that they're boycotting, it's the slave blood, sweat, and tears.
Because this is such a serious thing with such wide-reaching applications, if people don't take kindly to these kinds of jokes it's hard to be mad at them, because it's reducing a political boycott meant to stop suffering to a dietary restriction.
I'm not mad about the OP or anything, I just felt like... I mean, I wanted to answer the question in full. And the answer is that yeah, most folks will swallow because that's not affecting the principle of least suffering- it's a personal choice with no long-term ramifications.
