bigsly
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2018
- Posts
- 2,010
What was the other choice?
Berlin and Moscow meet Hiroshima and Nagasaki? There are always other choices.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What was the other choice?
Berlin and Moscow meet Hiroshima and Nagasaki? There are always other choices.
Just like your parallel with SA.
How many bases do we have in Africa?
![]()
SA today, however you need to ridiculously put any of its countries at "War", do not compare in the least to the utter war horrors of Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan and the Soviet Union of the 1930s-1940s (and, obviously in the Soviet Union's case, even longer).
And what point are you trying to make about bases in Africa?
Maybe you should apply to immigrate here so you could vote and straighten it all out.
You obviously feel you're very knowledgeable about what our problems are and how they can be best addressed.
"Your post is a great source or irony!" - Liam
SA today, however you need to ridiculously put any of its countries at "War", do not compare in the least to the utter war horrors of Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan and the Soviet Union of the 1930s-1940s (and, obviously in the Soviet Union's case, even longer).
And what point are you trying to make about bases in Africa?
Lessee....believe some thing from Politia-bull....or believe what some of my friends in the CBP told me, and one showed me....
I can't decide.
Oh, "war" is only defined as your arbitrary definition? Genocide is the hallmark?
Why do we have more bases in Africa than in SA?
The question is rhetorical, of course.
unlike Harry Reid they very much understand that at some point they will be in the minority and are looking to preserve their position then.
As a practical matter you can't change the rules of the Senate with something like 48 Republicans and some rinos. You would have to have you none and minute in order to do that. Which they don't have. Even if McConnell wanted to do that there's no way murkowski snow in flake would have gone along.
The only reason that they were able to remove the filibuster rule for SCOTUS nominees, which prevented the Democrats from having any say on Kavanaugh, is that Schumer stupidly decided to die on the hill that was Gorsuch. It was a stupid political miscalculation. That's the only thing that united the Republicans because there was absolutely no reason to filibuster Gorsuch.
She must realize how naive it makes her look to think that people voted for Trump because he promised Mexico would pay for the wall. The people just want the wall and while it seems like a clever dig, it makes it look like she can't read how voters think.
If it does get made, I hope, at least, that it's not an eyesore. Central to South America is kind of an escape from New York scenario right now.
She must realize how naive it makes her look to think that people voted for Trump because he promised Mexico would pay for the wall. The people just want the wall
Dianne Feinstein used to think that it illegal immigration was a problem....
https://youtu.be/Pgb0HL_mqpk
It's almost like we didn't JUST have an election where Trump tried to make immigration the one and only issue, and sent troops to the border for a blatantly political stunt, only for the GOP to get creamed up and down the ballot.
"The people" don't give a flying fuck.
It is a problem. But your fear of strong women is funny!
Nearly two years after taking office, President Donald Trump has gotten less popular in every state and Washington, DC, according to the findings of one polling firm.
Fear?
I agree with her.
You think it's a problem now?
Just yesterday you were telling me that I was wrong that it's a problem for California. It's apparently been a problem since before you learned how to make copies. The video is from 1994.