Dem Budget Chairman admits $5 billion is not that much for a wall, and walls work

[TalkRadio1]

Rep. John Yarmuth (D-Ky.), chairman of the House Budget Committee, admitted in an interview on Hill TV's "Rising" that the $5 billion President Donald Trump wants to fund a southern border wall isn't really that much money.

Yarmuth also admitted, in response to a series of challenges from host Buck Sexton, that border walls or fencing have proven to be effective already.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/dem-r...-not-that-much-for-a-wall-and-that-walls-work

 

[sharingfantasies]

https://www.theblaze.com/news/dem-r...-not-that-much-for-a-wall-and-that-walls-work

In the article, he also says "But we don't know where he's going to put the wall," Yarmuth continued. "He already has $1.3 trillion—er, $1.3 billion that he's only spent 6 percent of that was given to him for border security and he hasn't used that. So the question is, do you just say 'okay, $5 billion, take it'... maybe that's the right idea. Maybe just give him the $5 billion because he won't use it anyway."

It seems as if part of the problem with giving Trump five billion dollars is that he doesn't have a plan as to how to use it efficiently.

 

[SissySalina]

Mine fields work better and are cheaper.

 

[stickygirl]

The $5billion has nothing to do with walls and everything do with buying off Trump's vanity and hurt feelings. It's shut-up money he doesn't deserve and will do nothing to solve the problem.

 

[SpeareChucker]

The Blaze?

Maybe you should have done some more research instead of running with the first headline that confirmed your bias...

 

[Luk]

The Blaze?

Maybe you should have done some more research instead of running with the first headline that confirmed your bias...

Now, do you understand why we LOL every time you C&P confirmed biased article from American Thinker? Probably not due to your hypocritical rose-colored spectacles.

 

[someoneyouknow]

nm .......

 

[BotanyBoy]

Now, do you understand why we LOL every time you C&P confirmed biased article from American Thinker? Probably not due to your hypocritical rose-colored spectacles.

Except you (the left) do it with ANYTHING that disagrees with you.

Even the Encyclopedia Britannica and Websters Dictionary.....have been called unfit, invalid and or biased reference sources by your lot.

You can't even have a civil conversation with anyone who doesn't 'yes man' the entire PC narrative.

 

[Luk]

https://i.imgur.com/NUMC6Kd.jpg

 

[BotanyBoy]

https://i.imgur.com/NUMC6Kd.jpg

Thanks for demonstrating for me

 

[Oblimo]

It seems as if part of the problem with giving Trump five billion dollars is that he doesn't have a plan as to how to use it efficiently.

Bingo.

No one really knows what he means when he says "We need a wall."

No one can really explain what the $5 billion is supposed to be for. I've seen lots of wallists explain lots of different, interesting ideas, but no one can then say "and that is what Trump is asking for."

 

[10NadNuder]

It seems as if part of the problem with giving Trump five billion dollars is that he doesn't have a plan as to how to use it efficiently.

"Keep your mind on your money & your money on your mind" doesn't work for those who have a ton of the $ & ZIP of the other.