NBC News Contributor: If we can’t indict Donald Trump, let’s go after his children

[TalkRadio1]

NBC News legal analyst Jill Wine-Banks is publicly floating the idea of indicting President Trump’s children if no way can be found to indict him.

“I firmly believe the Constit[ution] permits indicting a sitting president, but if DOJ disagrees, indicting his children, the Trump Org & Foundation for their roles in wrongdoing is a great alternative–or addition[,]” she tweeted on Thursday:

And because the establishment media have violated so many norms, so degraded our political discourse in pursuit of Trump, ideas as un-American and monstrous as this are now considered acceptable. As long as you are talking about Trump or his family, nothing is off limits.

This is also a revealing look at the Stalinist mindset of the left and how politicized the legal pursuit of Trump has been and will continue to be.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...r-cant-indict-donald-trump-go-after-children/

 

[Luk]

A talking head wants to go after alleged criminals. What's your non-partisan problem with that?

 

[Que]

A talking head wants to go after alleged criminals. What's your non-partisan problem with that?

What crime are they alleged to have committed?

. . or would you rather just figure out some to charge at the show trials?

 

[coati]

The word children tends to imply kids running around the Whitehouse in their jammies, like Amy Carter or Sasha Obama or even Baron Trump.

However, regarding some of Trump's other "kids", the more appropriate term would be family-based co-conspirators.

Que is having a difficult time considering if election collusion with Russians or making personal profits from government activities might involve criminal activity. Bear with him. He needs to see some of them in orange suits before reality starts to sink in.

 

[Que]

Where is that "collusion" statute again?

You can't be guilty of an emoluments clause violation if you, yourself, are not an elected public official else Maxine Water's husband would be in jail along with all of Harry Reid's relatives.

Try again.

 

[coati]

Where is that "collusion" statute again?

You can't be guilty of an emoluments clause violation if you, yourself, are not an elected public official else Maxine Water's husband would be in jail along with all of Harry Reid's relatives.

Try again.

I don't have to "try". I'm just observing the news. There are paid investigators at the federal and state levels working on gross violations.

Let's talk again after the next set of violators from the Trump crime syndicate are convicted and sentenced.

 

[Liar]

Where is that "collusion" statute again?

You're pinning your argument on the fact that a colloquial non-legal term is not legal statute?

 

[jaF0]

Not 'or'. They're as dirty as he is and need to go also.

I'd like to see his sister (or whatever she is to him) pulled off the bench too. Guilt by association; shame the whole clan.

 

[OldJourno]

Not 'or'. They're as dirty as he is and need to go also.

I'd like to see his sister (or whatever she is to him) pulled off the bench too. Guilt by association; shame the whole clan.

And his dead brother. Let's dig the SOB up so everyone can piss on him.
That'll show 'em.

 

[Oblimo]

His kids are part of the Administration, for fuck’s sake. They’re running the country.

If they are corrupt and don’t enjoy immunity, nail their unAmerican asses to the jailhouse wall.

 

[Luk]

What crime are they alleged to have committed?

. . or would you rather just figure out some to charge at the show trials?

I'm not the one alleging anything, Q-#####. Ask the talking head.

 

[jaF0]

And his dead brother. Let's dig the SOB up so everyone can piss on him.
That'll show 'em.

I'm not into water sports, but rumor has it Donnie is, so ....

 

[RoryN]

True: if you re-arrange "TalkRadio", you get:

I a alt dork