LOI to build Trump Tower in Moscow signed by Tiny

BoyNextDoor

I hate liars
Joined
Apr 19, 2010
Posts
14,158
Donald J. Trump
Verified account @realDonaldTrump

Russia has never tried to use leverage over me. I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH RUSSIA - NO DEALS, NO LOANS, NO NOTHING!
4:31 AM - 11 Jan 2017


But he sure as hell wants to have businesses and property in Russia

I'll say this for tiny. He makes lying an art form.
 
The resident mental midget doesn't care that the wannabe dictator lied to the American people.

AGAIN.
 
Donald J. Trump
Verified account @realDonaldTrump

Russia has never tried to use leverage over me. I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH RUSSIA - NO DEALS, NO LOANS, NO NOTHING!
4:31 AM - 11 Jan 2017


But he sure as hell wants to have businesses and property in Russia

I'll say this for tiny. He makes lying an art form.

3 problems with your rhetoric.

1. We already knew he'd signed the letter of intent so this is not "new" news. Don Jr testified that his dad had signed the LOI.

2. The LOI was signed in October 2015 but the project never moved forward. Thus, Trump's statement in January 2017 (1.5 years later) that he has nothing to do with Russia was true despite your inference otherwise. Shame on you for either fabricating or perpetuating a lie.

3. The "news" about the LOI is loaded with fake facts. Like this one:

CNN's Chris Cuomo obtained a copy of the signed letter of intent that set the stage for negotiations for Trump condominiums, a hotel and commercial property in the heart of Moscow. The letter is dated October 28, 2015, and bears the President's signature.

It's a fact that he LOI bears the signature of Donald J. Trump. It does not have the signature of the President of the United States of America on it. Mostly because if the "the President" had signed it, it would be a treaty and not a LOI. Plus the additional fact that Donald Trump wasn't President in 2015. Saying it bears the President's signature is a LIE designed to inflame your brainwashed little minds.

And before you deflect, Guiliani is a washed-up hack who should have stuck with hawking his security company. He represents the worst of DC and NYC where it's the same bit players going 'round and 'round with new titles and offices while they get richer at the expense of the people.
 
As good a thread as any...hey...did I hear right last night...the president of the US of A and his entire adult family have been banned from participating in any charity work because they can't be trusted to actually give the money to people who need it but instead keep it for themselves?...like really?
 
3 problems with your rhetoric.

1. We already knew he'd signed the letter of intent so this is not "new" news. Don Jr testified that his dad had signed the LOI.

2. The LOI was signed in October 2015 but the project never moved forward. Thus, Trump's statement in January 2017 (1.5 years later) that he has nothing to do with Russia was true despite your inference otherwise. Shame on you for either fabricating or perpetuating a lie.

3. The "news" about the LOI is loaded with fake facts. Like this one:



It's a fact that he LOI bears the signature of Donald J. Trump. It does not have the signature of the President of the United States of America on it. Mostly because if the "the President" had signed it, it would be a treaty and not a LOI. Plus the additional fact that Donald Trump wasn't President in 2015. Saying it bears the President's signature is a LIE designed to inflame your brainwashed little minds.

And before you deflect, Guiliani is a washed-up hack who should have stuck with hawking his security company. He represents the worst of DC and NYC where it's the same bit players going 'round and 'round with new titles and offices while they get richer at the expense of the people.


You literally just typed out the long version of his "rhetoric". 45 lied and got caught again. That has nothing to do with Rudy.

He's referred to as the president because that's what he is now. No amount of words or over analyzing will change that.
 
It's a fact that he LOI bears the signature of Donald J. Trump. It does not have the signature of the President of the United States of America on it.

^^^^^

LOL

When your logic is this desperate, the horse you're betting on is headed to the glue factory. :D
 
As good a thread as any...hey...did I hear right last night...the president of the US of A and his entire adult family have been banned from participating in any charity work because they can't be trusted to actually give the money to people who need it but instead keep it for themselves?...like really?

That is correct.

They cannot be trusted to follow the law wrt managing a foundation. It is a "Checkbook" for the family.

I hear the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton family faces no such restriction, FYI. (LOL couldn't resist that part. Now I bet this thread goes in a new direction)
 
3 problems with your rhetoric.

1. We already knew he'd signed the letter of intent so this is not "new" news. Don Jr testified that his dad had signed the LOI.

2. The LOI was signed in October 2015 but the project never moved forward. Thus, Trump's statement in January 2017 (1.5 years later) that he has nothing to do with Russia was true despite your inference otherwise. Shame on you for either fabricating or perpetuating a lie.

3. The "news" about the LOI is loaded with fake facts. Like this one:



It's a fact that he LOI bears the signature of Donald J. Trump. It does not have the signature of the President of the United States of America on it. Mostly because if the "the President" had signed it, it would be a treaty and not a LOI. Plus the additional fact that Donald Trump wasn't President in 2015. Saying it bears the President's signature is a LIE designed to inflame your brainwashed little minds.

And before you deflect, Guiliani is a washed-up hack who should have stuck with hawking his security company. He represents the worst of DC and NYC where it's the same bit players going 'round and 'round with new titles and offices while they get richer at the expense of the people.


My assertion is Trump " sure as hell wants to have businesses and property in Russia" and that his lies by omission are an art form.

IRL I am not "BoyNextDoor", but neither am I CNN's Chris Cuomo. I bet every other person that read the OP understood that without explanation.
 
You literally just typed out the long version of his "rhetoric". 45 lied and got caught again. That has nothing to do with Rudy.

He's referred to as the president because that's what he is now. No amount of words or over analyzing will change that.


In Jan 2017 TRUMP said he didn't have any loans or deals with Russia. That's the truth because he DID NOT have any loans or deals with Russia because the LOI never went anywhere.

He did not say he did not ever attempt to have a deal to build a high rise tower in Moscow.

At the time of the signing Trump was NOT President. No amount of twisting will change that fact. Saying that "the President" signed the LOI is a bald faced LIE at the worst and extremely poor reporting at best.

And, RUDY said that Trump never signed the LOI. I guess that means it DOES have "something to do with Rudy".

Reading comprehension matters. You suck at it BTW.
 
My assertion is Trump " sure as hell wants to have businesses and property in Russia" and that his lies by omission are an art form.

IRL I am not "BoyNextDoor", but neither am I CNN's Chris Cuomo. I bet every other person that read the OP understood that without explanation.

1. Trump says what he says. That you read things into what he says which aren't there isn't Trump lying, it's you.

2. Deflection. The President did NOT sign the LOI. Nor did Trump sign while President. Thus the statement that "the President" signed the LOI is false on it's face, false in it's content, and false in the intent.
 
In Jan 2017 TRUMP said he didn't have any loans or deals with Russia. That's the truth because he DID NOT have any loans or deals with Russia because the LOI never went anywhere.

He did not say he did not ever attempt to have a deal to build a high rise tower in Moscow.

At the time of the signing Trump was NOT President. No amount of twisting will change that fact. Saying that "the President" signed the LOI is a bald faced LIE at the worst and extremely poor reporting at best.

And, RUDY said that Trump never signed the LOI. I guess that means it DOES have "something to do with Rudy".

Reading comprehension matters. You suck at it BTW.

You just repeated what was already said. Again. We all know he wasn't president at the time of signing the LOI, that's not the point.
 
You just repeated what was already said. Again. We all know he wasn't president at the time of signing the LOI, that's not the point.

TimRapy is trying to squeeze talking points into a reality that's getting tighter and tighter. It's both fun and embarrassing to watch.
 
You just repeated what was already said. Again. We all know he wasn't president at the time of signing the LOI, that's not the point.

It IS the point.

Trump's being flamed because of a lie.

He wasn't President in 2015, yet the article said the LOI was signed by "the President". It wasn't. It was signed by DJT, who is NOW President. The language matters.

It matters a great deal. Just as it matters that DJT signed in his capacity as CEO of Trump Enterprises and not in his capacity as a private citizen.

It's not a nuance. It's a VERY REAL thing that someone who, supposedly, owns/owned a shop should know.
 
In Jan 2017 TRUMP said he didn't have any loans or deals with Russia. That's the truth because he DID NOT have any loans or deals with Russia because the LOI never went anywhere.

He did not say he did not ever attempt to have a deal to build a high rise tower in Moscow.

At the time of the signing Trump was NOT President. No amount of twisting will change that fact. Saying that "the President" signed the LOI is a bald faced LIE at the worst and extremely poor reporting at best.

And, RUDY said that Trump never signed the LOI. I guess that means it DOES have "something to do with Rudy".

Reading comprehension matters. You suck at it BTW.


I'm not sure where you work but where I work when I get a LOI for a job thats as good as a purchase order.
Its a letter that says we are entering into a contract with you so start working on the project while we get the paperwork done. If it doesn't happen then you will be compensated for what you did.
If somebody dragged their feet on trumps project and nothing went anywhere he should fire them,.
Saying the LOI never went anywhere is a cop out

Hell..he can't even be trusted to run a charity let alone a country
 
I'm not sure where you work but where I work when I get a LOI for a job thats as good as a purchase order.
Its a letter that says we are entering into a contract with you so start working on the project while we get the paperwork done. If it doesn't happen then you will be compensated for what you did.
If somebody dragged their feet on trumps project and nothing went anywhere he should fire them,.
Saying the LOI never went anywhere is a cop out

Hell..he can't even be trusted to run a charity let alone a country


Letters of intent are NOT contracts. They are an expressed intention to enter into a binding contract IF mutually agreed upon terms and conditions can be established. They are not enforceable.

Purchase orders ARE contracts. They are enforceable.
 
We know you want it to be, baby boo.

But it's not.

Thanks for playing!

Oh look, another one of rory's attempt to try to say something relevant.

Still failing rory. Why don't you post the thread stats? At least that'll be something you CAN do.
 
The resident mental midget doesn't care that the wannabe dictator lied to the American people.

AGAIN.

Let me know when he argues the definition of the word "is." That's just making lying an art form.
 
Back
Top