Que
aʒɑ̃ prɔvɔkatœr
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2009
- Posts
- 39,882
But it's no issue, no?
Mexico is paying for it!
Woof!
Two column accounting a bit much for you?
Doesn't matter how much money you take in if you can't get authorization for the expenditure.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But it's no issue, no?
Mexico is paying for it!
Woof!
Clearly.
Two column accounting a bit much for you?
Doesn't matter how much money you take in if you can't get authorization for the expenditure.
Two column accounting a bit much for you?
Doesn't matter how much money you take in if you can't get authorization for the expenditure.
Has the money come in?
Yap!
That would require some rather complicated accounting and you can't get the concept of debits and credits so I don't think I'll bother to discuss renegotiation of NAFTA the increase in just fees alone going to Mexico as our economy increases and pressure on us manufacturers to put more manufacturing here rather than Mexico.
The yipping of foreigners in about us politics always sounds a little tinny to my ear.
Just as a point of interest did you read past the first line of your link and do you now know who Pierre-Joseph Proudhon is?
Woof!
But it's no issue, no?
Mexico is paying for it!
Woof!
Has the money come in?
Woof!
Why would Trump shutdown the US government for this???
I thought it was the Mexican government who were paying for the wall?
I mean, he said so and there was cheering and everything!
Woof!
Try me.
Edit: While you're sharing that with the class, also explain how an increase in revenue resulting from domestic production equates to Mexico paying for anything. Like the scenario you've painted here is just, "this'll suck for Mexico for a lil bit" but nothing about them paying for anything.
That would require some rather complicated accounting and you can't get the concept of debits and credits so I don't think I'll bother to discuss renegotiation of NAFTA the increase in just fees alone going to Mexico as our economy increases and pressure on us manufacturers to put more manufacturing here rather than Mexico.
The yipping of foreigners in about us politics always sounds a little tinny to my ear.
"I would build a great wall, and nobody builds walls better than me, believe me, and I’ll build them very inexpensively. I will build a great great wall on our southern border and I’ll have Mexico pay for that wall."
That's a pretty neat piece of arrogant dancing you're doing there.....except all of that falls far short of insisting that the wall would be paid not from the United States' budget but from Mexico’s!
Woof!
As I said you would completely have apparently no idea how the countries compensate other countries for things. They don't write checks.
Yes and yes.
It's only an issue if congress makes it one.
He put the ball in their court...question is will he force them to play or will he puss out and kowtow to the "progressive" open border agenda??
Nah....but that's never stopped anything before.
As I said you would completely have apparently no idea how the countries compensate other countries for things. They don't write checks.
Woof, indeed!
The Trump Effect: Mexico to pump $30B into Central America to halt migrant flow
https://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1491347
Except they do. When one country funds a project for another. Remember how WW2 got started because of that? Because Germany was forced to pay for reconstruction projects?
Or the numerous other examples throughout history.
Tell us how Mexico is gonna pay for the wall. Show us the finances that you claim to have. Go full accountant mode. I wanna see it. You know how interested I am in this shit.
-no..
Pelosi and Schumer do not think they cornered and embarrassed Trump. Quite the reverse.
They could not get away from the cameras fast enough.
Nancy Pelosi is so proud of her much winning she resorts to childish ad hominem:
“It’s like a manhood thing for him,” Pelosi told the Dems of Trump’s wall obsession, according to the source. “As if manhood could ever be associated with him.”
That certainly sounds like somebody who is quite confident that she cleverly cornered Trump and embarrassed him in that meeting.
Complete political ignorance on your part. What Trump did was agree and amplify to something that he was going to be pinned with regardless.
His options are to roll over and just let the Democrats have what they want. Why should he? Or go ahead and go for broke, and let them be on the record saying that despite the fact that they have every penny they could ever want for every social program they could ever dream of and the possibility of amnesty for DACA recipients on the table despite that being an illegal unconstitutional program from the previous president they still demand the right to continue to import Democrat voters.
Everybody who votes for Trump understands this and it doesn't really matter what you think does it?
Just like he always does, Rory is going to slink away from this thread when the poll numbers come out in a week or so showing the trumps popularity has increased. Nothing about this exchange hurts Trump with the people that matter to Trump. You really don't get it do you?
She said that as she was running away from the cameras as fast as she could, huh?![]()
Ok who is he?
Time will tell, I guess.
Do they really have a completely open boarder agenda? It’s never seemed that way to me when I came to the US, quite the reverse in fact.
And there you have it! The whole thing was bullshit politicking and playing to the crowd from the start.
Woof!