Clinton Foundation Donations Plummet 90%

That stands to reason. After all, why pay bribes to someone who can't do anything for you? :(
 
non responsive

answer the question

He's in a position of great power.

There are those who'd pay him to use such power for their advantages.

To an extent this is already being done with non-competitive American manufacturers agitating for tariffs, the American merchants of death getting multi-billion-dollar contracts with Trump's Islamo-fascist friends in Saudi Arabia, and as his finances are opaque—who knows what's going on;

and he's a proven liar.

Now if you want to believe there is no bribery going on, you believe such. I'll maintain that as corrupt as the Clintons were—and they were—Trump is far more corrupt.
 
He's in a position of great power.

There are those who'd pay him to use such power for their advantages.

To an extent this is already being done with non-competitive American manufacturers agitating for tariffs, the American merchants of death getting multi-billion-dollar contracts with Trump's Islamo-fascist friends in Saudi Arabia, and as his finances are opaque—who knows what's going on;

and he's a proven liar.

Now if you want to believe there is no bribery going on, you believe such. I'll maintain that as corrupt as the Clintons were—and they were—Trump is far more corrupt.

Lol. None of that is "bribery". Plus, you even admit you don't know squat about if he is or isn't.

But keep on hatin'.
 
He's in a position of great power.

There are those who'd pay him to use such power for their advantages.

To an extent this is already being done with non-competitive American manufacturers agitating for tariffs, the American merchants of death getting multi-billion-dollar contracts with Trump's Islamo-fascist friends in Saudi Arabia, and as his finances are opaque—who knows what's going on;

and he's a proven liar.

Now if you want to believe there is no bribery going on, you believe such. I'll maintain that as corrupt as the Clintons were—and they were—Trump is far more corrupt.
WHO???????
 
if the foundation were legit

donations wouldnt have fallen when CuntClinton int in office
 
Here is something about Silly Hilly's speakers fees:https://braincharm.com/2018/10/18/hillary-clinton-accepts-lesser-speaking-fees-after-national-loss/

As senator or Sec. of State or a presidential candidate, she used to take in hundreds of thousands at a time. As a private citizen, this amount has been vastly reduced.


Last Thursday, Clinton was paid $25,000 for her speech to the University — according to Rutgers.

That is $7,000 less than Nicole “Snooki” Polizzi, the Jersey Shore cast member was paid $32,000 to speak in 2011 to the University.


Technically the vast amounts previously taken in were fees, rather than bribes or payoffs. If you believe this, I have a very nice bridge you might be interested in buying.
 
Last edited:
Opinion
Did China Just Bribe Trump to Undermine National Security?
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/17/opinion/trump-china-bribe-national-security.html

By Paul Krugman
May 17, 2018




$500 Million Bribe Helps Explain Trump's China Reversal
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNKej2XS4ys
7:56
4,842 views
President Donald Trump is negotiating with China on trade while the Trump Organization is involved in a deal linked to a Chinese developer.
A state-owned Chinese construction company, MCC Group, said last Thursday it had formalized plans to develop a theme park in Lido, Indonesia. The park is part of a broader project called MNC Lido City, and the Trump Organization has existing licensing agreements for other components of the project.
 
Paul Krugman?:rolleyes:

Never heard of him.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Krugman

(my bold)
Paul Robin Krugman (/ˈkrʊɡmən/ (About this soundlisten) KRUUG-mən;[1][2] born February 28, 1953)[3] is an American economist who is currently Distinguished Professor of Economics at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, and a columnist for The New York Times.[4] In 2008, Krugman was awarded the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences for his contributions to New Trade Theory and New Economic Geography.[5] The Prize Committee cited Krugman's work explaining the patterns of international trade and the geographic distribution of economic activity, by examining the effects of economies of scale and of consumer preferences for diverse goods and services.[6]


He seems credible.
 
Back
Top