bellisarius
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2017
- Posts
- 16,761
Re. the Camp fire in CA.
Deadliest Fire.
Throughout our National and State forests this is occurring with greater frequency. Fire roads are being cut to restrict access and/or not maintained. Not so much as a result of any policy but as a result of lack of funds. Over 34% of the lands of the US are owned by the federal government in the form of National Parks, forests, monuments, BLM property, and even the Indian reservations. But they are no longer able to maintain the lands even though until this administration they continually tried to acquire more. In other words our public lands are going to hell in a hand basket while the hand wringers in the metropolitan areas stress out over inconsequential shit like gender neutral bathrooms, and rights for criminals.
These fires are going to be occurring more frequently and of increasing severity due to poor management of the lands. And I'm not accusing the people charged with maintaining the lands, they just don't have the resources to deal with the problem anymore.
Why wasn't the overburden cleared out in the area where this particular fire started? The answer is in the small portion of the article I quoted. The fire road wasn't maintained. And why not? Most likely because the funds weren't available to do so. A few years ago there was a severe fire in the Jemez mountains just North of here. The fire fighters had to go in on ATV's. They couldn't get heavy equipment to the area because the fire roads had been cut, purposely cut. These cuts were to save money. If no one used the fire roads no one had to maintain them. When the fire broke out their fiscal decision came back to bite them in the ass.
To the metropolitan dwellers that keep voting for more entitlements for themselves, the national lands are an abstraction. Something that they pay lip service to as a 'virtue signal' but in reality could give a rats ass about. At least until such time as a discussion begins about the government divesting itself of some of the land. Then they behave as if they're having their house sold out from underneath them.
You can have your public lands or you can have your entitlements, but you can't have both.
At 6:15 a.m., a Pacific Gas & Electric Co. high-voltage line near the Poe Dam generating station six miles away malfunctioned. A report of fire came at 6:29.
Fifteen minutes later, McKenzie stood at the dam looking helplessly across the river canyon at a 10-acre fire on the rock slope above. He had no way to reach it. Its unpaved access route, Camp Creek Road, clung to the mountain so precariously that rock slides threatened to erase it.
The last time he put a heavy wildland engine on the crumbling grade, it took an hour to creep a mile, mirrors folded in, a man walking beside each wheel to watch for collapse. It would be a death sentence to send a crew out there in a fire.
Deadliest Fire.
Throughout our National and State forests this is occurring with greater frequency. Fire roads are being cut to restrict access and/or not maintained. Not so much as a result of any policy but as a result of lack of funds. Over 34% of the lands of the US are owned by the federal government in the form of National Parks, forests, monuments, BLM property, and even the Indian reservations. But they are no longer able to maintain the lands even though until this administration they continually tried to acquire more. In other words our public lands are going to hell in a hand basket while the hand wringers in the metropolitan areas stress out over inconsequential shit like gender neutral bathrooms, and rights for criminals.
These fires are going to be occurring more frequently and of increasing severity due to poor management of the lands. And I'm not accusing the people charged with maintaining the lands, they just don't have the resources to deal with the problem anymore.
Why wasn't the overburden cleared out in the area where this particular fire started? The answer is in the small portion of the article I quoted. The fire road wasn't maintained. And why not? Most likely because the funds weren't available to do so. A few years ago there was a severe fire in the Jemez mountains just North of here. The fire fighters had to go in on ATV's. They couldn't get heavy equipment to the area because the fire roads had been cut, purposely cut. These cuts were to save money. If no one used the fire roads no one had to maintain them. When the fire broke out their fiscal decision came back to bite them in the ass.
To the metropolitan dwellers that keep voting for more entitlements for themselves, the national lands are an abstraction. Something that they pay lip service to as a 'virtue signal' but in reality could give a rats ass about. At least until such time as a discussion begins about the government divesting itself of some of the land. Then they behave as if they're having their house sold out from underneath them.
You can have your public lands or you can have your entitlements, but you can't have both.