Remember when Democrats shit their pants

Yeah, typos that I already corrected on a small screen certainly *proves* sonething.

You should go ahead and take those little victories where you find them, pathetic that they may be. It's all you have.

Maybe he could change his name to lukatmylittlevictories.
Just a thought.
 
Yeah, typos that I already corrected on a small screen certainly *proves* sonething.

You should go ahead and take those little victories where you find them, pathetic that they may be. It's all you have.

Please, little bitch. Do you think one fucking case proves that there's a Democratic push to have illegal votes counted?

A photograph of Rosa Maria Ortega with her family. She said in court that she had not known she was ineligible to vote and was confused by registration forms and explanations by election officials.

Lock
Her
Up
!

:rolleyes:
 
Please, little bitch. Do you think one fucking case proves that there's a Democratic push to have illegal votes counted?



Lock
Her
Up
!

:rolleyes:

Already anticipated and covered that, champ.

Again, there is no question at all amongst those who follows electoral politics that illegals do vote the only question is how many of them and the number as I pointed out in the second linked article is far larger than previously thought.

Then again how would anyone know with a system specifically designed to facilitate Democrat cheating?
 
Oh look, an illegal vote happened. But we were discussing illegal votes, as in more than one. I think someone mentioned hundreds of thousands of illegal votes. Let us know when you find a hundred.
 
Oh look, an illegal vote happened. But we were discussing illegal votes, as in more than one. I think someone mentioned hundreds of thousands of illegal votes. Let us know when you find a hundred.

A other diehard that cannot read.

Already anticipated and answered:

~snipped for the slow readers~

What's that you say? That's the only time in the history of never it ever happened?

How would you know?

The ninth circuit told Arizona we cannot demand proof of citizenship. Anyone that actually knows about the integrity of our elections knows only one party objects to measures to ensure only eligible voters vote. It isn't in question whether or not illegals vote, (in some jurisdictions it is legal for them to vote in local elections) the only question is how many of them do so.

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/19/noncitizen-illegal-vote-number-higher-than-estimat/.



Besides I only needed to find one to disprove Luke's ridiculous assertion that it never happens.
 
Last edited:
Already anticipated and covered that, champ.

Again, there is no question at all amongst those who follows electoral politics that illegals do vote the only question is how many of them and the number as I pointed out in the second linked article is far larger than previously thought.

Then again how would anyone know with a system specifically designed to facilitate Democrat cheating?

Hardly. Your second link was a hack job of a few conspiracies with no links to an actual study but plenty of "Well, there MAY be SOME illegals voting but we have no fucking clue and we're just butthurt about the actual results when our side loses".

Sorry, chump.
 
The Horrible Orange Thing screamed about 5 million illegal votes.

He dissolved his panel on voter fraud.

Why was it so difficult to find five million ?

What did they find ?

The only ones that deliberately broke the law were Republicans, that double-dipped.


:rolleyes:
 
Another blowhard who cannot write.

Congratulations! You just graduated to the Luk league of better debate through pedantic nit-pickery.

A dubious distinction at best.


But hey...when you're incapable of articulating a cogent counterpoint I guess you gotta do the best you can.
 
Congratulations! You just graduated to the Luk league of better debate through pedantic nit-pickery.

A dubious distinction at best.


But hey...when you're incapable of articulating a cogent counterpoint I guess you gotta do the best you can.

Then it should be easy to address Luk's calling you on your bullshit, yes?
 
When Donald Trump said he wouldn't necessarily accept the election results in 2016?
My God, the Democrats moaned and wailed, democracy would collapse if we have no confidence in elections.
Fast forward to 2018 and Georgia, where Democrat Stacey Abrams has lost the race for governor by thousands of votes. Hillary Clinton says Abrams was cheated but there is no evidence to back up this irresponsible and dangerous claim - dangerous because it will rile morons who will believe her only because she is Hillary Clinton despite her sleazy past.
And we're giving sleazy a bad name by linking it to the Clintons.

So it's OK for the Donald to be sleazy and say that the election is rigged and being stolen, but Hillary can't? Man ya'll are gunna have to start a business giving lessons on fact fabrication and opinion vacillation. Ya'll could make a damned mint! As an embedded lesson you could give a verbal money back guarantee, then when shit falls apart, you can say you never did! Genius! total fucking genius!

Comshaw
 
Then it should be easy to address Luk's calling you on your typographical errors, yes?

Of course, but it seems pretty unnecessary to address the obvious deflection.
 
Of course, but it seems pretty unnecessary to address the obvious deflection.

That's twice today that you've been shut down after being caught lying. Wanna go for the trifecta, little lying bitch?
 
That's twice today that you've been shut down after being caught lying. Wanna go for the trifecta, little lying bitch?

Wanna get angry and refer to yourself in 3rd person again?

Luk is cool when luk does this.
 
I notice an incredible tolerance for "letting the process play out" when the Democrat is behind.
This process was supposed to be decided on one day. It's not that complicated and all of us should be appalled that it has taken this long to resolve any seat in any race.
This is the United States of America, not some Banana Republic, but we've got people wandering around South Florida finding ballot boxes in closets and we're supposed to pretend it's just part of the "process."
 
Come to think of it OldJourno, it's hard to remember a time when the Democrats weren't shitting their pants.
 
Here's old Kirkrapeme giving the :rolleyes: to suggestions the Democrats might do something shady, yet he absolutely shits his pants when someone suggests ways to stop shady stuff from happening.
You stop shady stuff from happening by requiring voter ID and by purging the rolls every few years. Why any judge would step in and stop a legal action from taking place, such as purging the rolls, and why any political party would oppose such an action, gives one pause.
Purged from the rolls? The simple solution is to register again.
Voter ID? Are people so busy they can't get valid ID at some point over the course of two years? Or are you suggesting some minorities are too stupid to do so?
 
quit falling for fake news from right wing blogs, chief. a manufactured screenshot of a faked affidavit don't mean shit.

Surely you're not suggesting the Daily Caller just makes shit up?

It's at least as reliable as The Onion.
 
*sigh*


You need a new schtick. Your "you lying bitch" thing is tedious and obviously an attempt to deflect from your own lies and obfuscations.

Que pwned you. Now you're demanding a second ass whipping. Ok, I can do that.


DNC objects to not allowing non-citizens to vote in Florida election

He uses those outbursts to protect his low IQ inability to argue the facts of any matter.

You two dumbfucks should really do some research before popping off again. Luk was correct.
 
Back
Top