Elizabeth Warren proves her ancestry; embarrasses shit out of Trump & Trumpsters

The more I read about this fiasco, the more I'm convinced Warren embarrassed the shit out of herself.
For crying out loud, she maybe had some Injun blood 8 generations ago?
Once a Fauxcahontas ...
 
The more I read about this fiasco, the more I'm convinced Warren embarrassed the shit out of herself.
For crying out loud, she maybe had some Injun blood 8 generations ago?
Once a Fauxcahontas ...

But then Trump's American-born background doesn't go back any farther than his father, so there you go. ;)
 
Elizabeth Warren pretty much just owned herself. Why can't she just shut up. This is Rachel Dolezal territory.
 
Orange tRump wants control over the testing of Elizabeth Warren's DNA.


What could possibly go wrong ?

Let us review the erased tweets (illegal)

Let us review altered videotape by FOX TV


Why would a CEO refuse to grant tRump a favor, and not alter Elizabeth's results ? After all, the tRump Alliance will allow any donor to do what tRump himself does.
 
Yeah, he used it to get his current job. Didn't have to lie about it either.

I laughed. He repeatedly said his daddy gave him "only" $1 million and he had to pay it back. He said that over and over and over again. You are a riot. :D

And, funny, I didn't hear him mention that his granddaddy ran a brothel and opium den, but that fit into all the whores he didn't mention doing the dirty with either.
 
1.)

Bustamante is on the scientific advisory board for Ancestry, which provides commercial DNA tests. He’s also consulted on a project for 23andMe, another major DNA testing company

2.)

Earlier this month at rally in Iowa, Trump said he hoped Warren would run for president because it would allow him to find out “whether or not she has Indian blood.”

3.)

Warren has 12 times more Native American blood than a white person from Great Britain and 10 times more than a white person from Utah, the report found.

5.)

Due to a math error, a story about Elizabeth Warren misstated the ancestry percentage of a potential 6th to 10th generation relative. The generational range based on the ancestor that the report identified suggests she’s between 1/64th and 1/1,024th Native American.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/po...rican-issue/YEUaGzsefB0gPBe2AbmSVO/story.html

gsgs comment- Elizabeth Warren never claimed to be an "Indian."
 
Warren: I am part Native American

gsgs comment- Elizabeth Warren never claimed to be an "Indian."

Sen. Elizabeth Warren made a surprising appearance at the National Congress of American Indians this week and made an even more surprising statement that she is indeed part Native American. I have been critical of the use of this label (and name calling generally) by the President and others. The sudden discussion of the controversy was unexpected by Warren. The assumption for years is that Warren had backed off from this claim made during her academic career.

She was counted by Harvard Law School as a Native American. Indeed, we first discussed this issue when Warren was still an academic and her claim that claiming to a Native American offered no advantage to her career. The speech comes at an interesting time for academia where more and more schools are allowing students to not simply choose their gender (or non-gender) but also their race.

In the videotape of the speech, Warren went after President Donald Trump for his name calling over her claim and argued that the use of “Pocahontas” was engaging in “disrespect of Native people.”

However, she then said this: “I get why some people think there’s hay to be made here. You won’t find my family members on any rolls, and I’m not enrolled in a tribe. … I respect that distinction . . . I never used my family tree to get a break or get ahead. I never used it to advance my career. . . . my mother’s family was part Native American.”
https://jonathanturley.org/2018/02/16/warren-i-am-part-native-american/#more-133591
 
Most people can distinguish the sense of "I am part x," from the sense of "I am (or, I identify as) x." For example, I have Norwegian heritage. I rightfully say that I am part Norwegian. I do not, however, identify as a Norwegian.

TalkRadio1 isn't most people.
 
That's a bold claim coming from a supporter of repeatedly failed economic theory.

So, were you going to document where I ever registered as "a supporter of repeatedly failed economic theory"?

You were just lying, right?
 
This week, she (Elizabeth Warren) released the result of a DNA test trying to ascertain whether that family lore is correct. The test suggested she probably did have a Cherokee ancestor six to ten generations ago. Conservatives claimed this proved she had less Native American ancestry than the average person, and the conclusion spread virally through conservative media, although it was false.


In any case, the DNA test had no bearing on either of the relevant facts. We don’t usually expect people to scientifically verify claims of ancestry when they check boxes on forms. Was Warren told she had Cherokee ancestry? Nobody has produced any evidence to the contrary.


More to the point, did she benefit from affirmative action as an alleged Native American? The Boston Globe’s Annie Linskey conducted an exhaustive investigation of this question last month, digging through personnel records and interviewing former colleagues and supervisors. The result of her reporting was unambiguous. “The Globe found clear evidence, in documents and interviews, that her claim to Native American ethnicity was never considered by the Harvard Law faculty, which voted resoundingly to hire her, or by those who hired her to four prior positions at other law schools,” it found. “At every step of her remarkable rise in the legal profession, the people responsible for hiring her saw her as a white woman.”


http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018...trump-for-spreading-elizabeth-warren-lie.html
 
Most people can distinguish the sense of "I am part x," from the sense of "I am (or, I identify as) x." For example, I have Norwegian heritage. I rightfully say that I am part Norwegian. I do not, however, identify as a Norwegian.

TalkRadio1 isn't most people.

He's a dumbfuck bot. vettebirther is scared he's going to replace him on the GeeBee.
 
Orange tRump wants control over the testing of Elizabeth Warren's DNA.


What could possibly go wrong ?

Let us review the erased tweets (illegal)

Let us review altered videotape by FOX TV


Why would a CEO refuse to grant tRump a favor, and not alter Elizabeth's results ? After all, the tRump Alliance will allow any donor to do what tRump himself does.
And let us recall the time Trump told us that he sent an armada to North Korea, and it turned out they were going the wrong way.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...ada-was-headed-toward-australia-idUSKBN17L03J
 
Guys, check this out:

Understanding Inheritance
"Below are four sets of DNA ethnicity results from four siblings.

If you look at the results on the far right, European West almost doesn’t exist, while the sibling on the far left has 32%,[/B] the next sibling has [B]5%, and the third one has 16%."

https://support.ancestry.com.au/s/article/AU-Understanding-Inheritance


Maybe her Native American lineage is more prominent than it's been speculated.
These probability calculations are very complicated + nevermind the random inheritance factor.

I suspect that one of the TV programs might bring in a geneticist to discuss these matters.
 
"The key takeaway of Trump’s birtherism stint is that he has proven adept at wielding bullying and gaslighting in service of racial gatekeeping, and he isn’t impeded by facts. The age-old game of racial essentialism and blood policing is itself intended to stack the deck in favor of bullies, to always siphon power from the weak, and to require an ever-shifting burden of proof among aggrieved parties that can never be met. Trump will always win this game because it is rigged for him to win."

The order of events that will ensue are predictable. Trump will not retire his slurs. Republican operatives beholden to him will continue to ridicule and poke holes in the evidence Warren has presented. There will be no substantiated bets.


https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...ens-feud-over-racial-heritage-and-dna/573091/


Wages says he is one-eighth Cherokee. An examination of government and tribal records by The Times and a leading Cherokee genealogist casts doubt on that claim, however. He is a member of a group called the Northern Cherokee Nation, which has no federal or state recognition as a legitimate tribe. It is considered a fraud by leaders of tribes that have federal recognition.

The contracts obtained by Wages’ company have prompted questions about whether he improperly benefited from being McCarthy’s brother-in-law.

All three Cherokee tribes with federal recognition consider the Northern Cherokee group illegitimate.

“It’s very much a con."

http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-na-pol-mccarthy-contracts-20181014-story.html
 
Last edited:
Orange tRump wants control over the testing of Elizabeth Warren's DNA.


What could possibly go wrong ?

Let us review the erased tweets (illegal)

Let us review altered videotape by FOX TV


Why would a CEO refuse to grant tRump a favor, and not alter Elizabeth's results ? After all, the tRump Alliance will allow any donor to do what tRump himself does.

OMG, a conspiracy theory. Now we really are off the rails.
 
And let us recall the time he described telling the President of China that he was bombing Iraq when he was actually bombing Syria.
 
So, were you going to document where I ever registered as "a supporter of repeatedly failed economic theory"?

You were just lying, right?

You consider Warren to currently be but also foresee her continuing to be a "strong voice for reason" do you not?:confused:

Then you must consider her social and economic ideas about redistributing the wealth of the nation and nationalizing most of the US economy to do it also reasonable do you not? :confused:


And you very definitely are a Trumpette. ;)

How do you figure? :confused:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top