Kreepy Kavanaugh

[Que]

After watching the testimony of both Ford and Kavanaugh, this quote from Emma Gonzalez is how I feel about it:

..."The future of our country deserves more than a privileged white boy who’s spent his whole life over-drinking and can’t answer a simple question without acting more immature about it than a 4-year-old.”...

https://www.yahoo.com/news/parkland-survivor-emma-gonzalez-calls-161540424.html

'nuff said.




Comshaw

Really? That was what *you* thought?

What part of him being male and white disgusted you in particular?

After reading your self-loathing post, this article from Ann Coulter is how I feel about it::

http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2018-09-26.html

 

[Desiremakesmeweak]

Latest 'Q' about 'Christine Blasey Ford.'

'Q' has been silent recently but presented the following down those clandestine encrypted paths everyone with the skills is able to locate:

"Christine Blasey Ford is closer to seventy years old than fifty, and he/she/it was likely one of the 'evangelical nuns on pilgrimage to see the miraculous appearances of Mary' - sent out under that cover to place high explosives in bridges in Medrugorje just prior to the 'War in Yugoslavia' breaking out due to the inflaming of emotions on both sides - Islamic Albanian and Croatian, and Serbian Orthodox and Croatian Catholic."

 

[Lorilei]

Latest 'Q' about 'Christine Blasey Ford.'

'Q' has been silent recently but presented the following down those clandestine encrypted paths everyone with the skills is able to locate:

"Christine Blasey Ford is closer to seventy years old than fifty, and he/she/it was likely one of the 'evangelical nuns on pilgrimage to see the miraculous appearances of Mary' - sent out under that cover to place high explosives in bridges in Medrugorje just prior to the 'War in Yugoslavia' breaking out due to the inflaming of emotions on both sides - Islamic Albanian and Croatian, and Serbian Orthodox and Croatian Catholic."

Are you having a stroke?

 

[Ann_Tagonist]

Are you having a stroke?

Is your Adrina account down for maintenance?

 

[von_Bismarck]

Latest 'Q' about 'Christine Blasey Ford.'

'Q' has been silent recently but presented the following down those clandestine encrypted paths everyone with the skills is able to locate:

"Christine Blasey Ford is closer to seventy years old than fifty, and he/she/it was likely one of the 'evangelical nuns on pilgrimage to see the miraculous appearances of Mary' - sent out under that cover to place high explosives in bridges in Medrugorje just prior to the 'War in Yugoslavia' breaking out due to the inflaming of emotions on both sides - Islamic Albanian and Croatian, and Serbian Orthodox and Croatian Catholic."

Are you related to vetteguide?

 

[Luk]

Really? That was what *you* thought?

What part of him being male and white disgusted you in particular?

After reading your self-loathing post, this article from Ann Coulter is how I feel about it::

http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2018-09-26.html

No one is surprised that you take your cues from a racist white woman who belittles weak white men.

 

[Luk]

Are you having a stroke?

He and Q-#### share a common fondness for burnt toast.

 

[doowdniw]

Well that's fucked up...

Yes, it is. And being an almost contemporaneous alum of an "elite" east coast all male prep school myself, I find it completely credible. Parties were routinely at whoever's parents were out of town for the weekend, starting in 10th grade. And almost everyone got a nice new shiny car when they turned 16, so transportation was never a problem, even for those who were not yet driving. Fucked up? That's putting it mildly. And I doubt that beer was the only thing they were doing in the early 80s. I'd be willing to bet the farm that more than a few bags of weed and bumps of cocaine were enjoyed by Brett and his jock cohorts. And everyone knew what "pulling a train" referred to, and consent was rarely asked or given due to the level of intoxication of all involved.

Brett may be pulling the wool over the eyes of the octogenarians on the judiciary committee, but not fooling for a minute anyone who was coming of age during the 70s and 80s. And particularly anyone one familiar with the preppy culture of that time.

 

[Comshaw]

Really? That was what *you* thought?

What part of him being male and white disgusted you in particular?

After reading your self-loathing post, this article from Ann Coulter is how I feel about it::

http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2018-09-26.html

So since the quote identified him as male and white (which I believe he is ) that's the only thing you focused on? That's the only thing you can get spun up about, a part of my post, an identifier, that is 100% irrefutably accurate and true? Nothing about him being privileged, which anyone with half a brain and one good eye could see is a fact, and acting like a 4 year old, which his diatribe on the Clinton's, those who oppose Trump and other things having nothing to do with his confirmation (and much of which is pure unadulterated manufactured from thin air crap) showed in Technicolor? Refusing to answer certain questions, evasion, lying about his drinking in high school and college doesn't show a pattern of privilege and entitlement? And why doesn't any of that surprise me when it springs from you?

I had no problem with seating a conservative judge on the Supreme court bench. I do however have a problem with doing so with someone who has such a flawed character and fluid idea of morals.

The Supreme court is the last stop for any determination of U.S. law. As such we need the best of the best and not someone who will act using their emotions and not the logic of the law. We shouldn't have someone on the bench who will lie to protect themselves.

Pick a conservative candidate. There are many out there who meet that criteria who also have character and solid morals.

WE DO NOT NEED, NOR CAN WE AFFORD SOMEONE LIKE KAVENAUGH ON THE SUPREME COURT BENCH.

As an aside, I think your eye patch is getting kind of ragged.


Comshaw

 

[Ann_Tagonist]

So since the quote identified him as male and white (which I believe he is ) that's the only thing you focused on? That's the only thing you can get spun up about, a part of my post, an identifier, that is 100% irrefutably accurate and true? Nothing about him being privileged, which anyone with half a brain and one good eye could see is a fact, and acting like a 4 year old, which his diatribe on the Clinton's, those who oppose Trump and other things having nothing to do with his confirmation (and much of which is pure unadulterated manufactured from thin air crap) showed in Technicolor? Refusing to answer certain questions, evasion, lying about his drinking in high school and college doesn't show a pattern of privilege and entitlement? And why doesn't any of that surprise me when it springs from you?

I had no problem with seating a conservative judge on the Supreme court bench. I do however have a problem with doing so with someone who has such a flawed character and fluid idea of morals.

The Supreme court is the last stop for any determination of U.S. law. As such we need the best of the best and not someone who will act using their emotions and not the logic of the law. We shouldn't have someone on the bench who will lie to protect themselves.

Pick a conservative candidate. There are many out there who meet that criteria who also have character and solid morals.

WE DO NOT NEED, NOR CAN WE AFFORD SOMEONE LIKE KAVENAUGH ON THE SUPREME COURT BENCH.

As an aside, I think your eye patch is getting kind of ragged.


Comshaw

Perhaps a more "liberal" judge would be to your liking?

 

[Oblimo]

Are you having a stroke?

Desire is just quoting Q Anon, who thousands of wackadoos are convinced is the messiah of politics. I suspect the post was a “take a look at THIS shit” message rather than a “here’s the truth, straight from Q Anon himself,” message.

 

[Oblimo]

What part of him being male and white disgusted you in particular?

What part of him being male and white gives you such a politiboner?

 

[Oblimo]

Life in a Gynocracy

Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha...
*deep, spluttering breath*
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

 

[BBX50]

After watching the testimony of both Ford and Kavanaugh, this quote from Emma Gonzalez is how I feel about it:

..."The future of our country deserves more than a privileged white boy who’s spent his whole life over-drinking and can’t answer a simple question without acting more immature about it than a 4-year-old.”...

https://www.yahoo.com/news/parkland-survivor-emma-gonzalez-calls-161540424.html

'nuff said.




Comshaw

who the fuck is Emma Gonzalez and why the fuck shpuld we care what she says?

 

[BBX50]

but seriously

someone brings up an "issue" of 35 yrs ago with NO memory of KEY events ...no proof...all the persons she named as BEING there, DENY IT.....

what would you call her?


Since NO ONE can answer, I will


You call her a

LYING DUMOH

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Details? Please elaborate

Yes, it is. And being an almost contemporaneous alum of an "elite" east coast all male prep school myself, I find it completely credible. Parties were routinely at whoever's parents were out of town for the weekend, starting in 10th grade. And almost everyone got a nice new shiny car when they turned 16, so transportation was never a problem, even for those who were not yet driving. Fucked up? That's putting it mildly. And I doubt that beer was the only thing they were doing in the early 80s. I'd be willing to bet the farm that more than a few bags of weed and bumps of cocaine were enjoyed by Brett and his jock cohorts. And everyone knew what "pulling a train" referred to, and consent was rarely asked or given due to the level of intoxication of all involved.

Brett may be pulling the wool over the eyes of the octogenarians on the judiciary committee, but not fooling for a minute anyone who was coming of age during the 70s and 80s. And particularly anyone one familiar with the preppy culture of that time.

 

[Lorilei]

Desire is just quoting Q Anon, who thousands of wackadoos are convinced is the messiah of politics. I suspect the post was a “take a look at THIS shit” message rather than a “here’s the truth, straight from Q Anon himself,” message.

Ah. Thank you.

 

[gotsnowgotslush]

*reads off-the-wall comment*

Are there info-tainment/ Extremist Right Wing Republican propaganda outlets that FOX TV will not quote/feature/advertise ?

It is a collection of words, but it dies not have much of a connection to reality...

Please pardon my typo

but the comment, (that is just a collection of words) does not have much of a connection to reality...

 

[BBX50]

Once the FBI comes back with nothing on Kavanaugh the new talking point will be “Trump obstructed the investigation”

Watch

In fact, they’re already laying the groundwork

 

[BBX50]

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/BaowFHyMqyctDU9iTyZynolziCNAl3gNqKS5pMLXIN7GFhKlBVhiTf23p4SN6Bf5u469fQ=s85

 

[BBX50]

Accuser 5 - recants
Accuser 4 - debunked
Accuser 3 - Avenatti's client, excluded from probe due to baselessness?
Accuser 2 - won't return FBI's calls

That just leaves Ford and Kavanaugh.
Since we've analyzed HIS high school yearbook, shouldn't we analyze HERS?

 

[Que]

So since the quote identified him as male and white (which I believe he is ) that's the only thing you focused on? That's the only thing you can get spun up about, a part of my post, an identifier, that is 100% irrefutably accurate and true? Nothing about him being privileged, which anyone with half a brain and one good eye could see is a fact, and acting like a 4 year old, which his diatribe on the Clinton's, those who oppose Trump and other things having nothing to do with his confirmation (and much of which is pure unadulterated manufactured from thin air crap) showed in Technicolor? Refusing to answer certain questions, evasion, lying about his drinking in high school and college doesn't show a pattern of privilege and entitlement? And why doesn't any of that surprise me when it springs from you?

I had no problem with seating a conservative judge on the Supreme court bench. I do however have a problem with doing so with someone who has such a flawed character and fluid idea of morals.

The Supreme court is the last stop for any determination of U.S. law. As such we need the best of the best and not someone who will act using their emotions and not the logic of the law. We shouldn't have someone on the bench who will lie to protect themselves.

Pick a conservative candidate. There are many out there who meet that criteria who also have character and solid morals.

WE DO NOT NEED, NOR CAN WE AFFORD SOMEONE LIKE KAVENAUGH ON THE SUPREME COURT BENCH.

As an aside, I think your eye patch is getting kind of ragged.


Comshaw

Why the qualifiers ar all? Why are they always included, when the same people assiduouslynkeave out, for example, the race of non-white criminals?

Ok, I'll play. I pick Barrett.

Her morals are just fine.

As a bonus, she's objectionable enough to the left that Feinstein actually violated the US Constitution by suggesting that the free exercise of one's religion is a disqualifying characteristic for serving on the bench. An actual direct violation of the First Amendment protections cimmitted by a sitting US senator in public without the least bit of chagrin.

A hatchet-job alleging moral failings by the contingent that believes in moral relativism is deliciously ironic.

 

[cowslinger64]

Why the qualifiers ar all? Why are they always included, when the same people assiduouslynkeave out, for example, the race of non-white criminals?

Ok, I'll play. I pick Barrett.

Her morals are just fine.

As a bonus, she's objectionable enough to the left that Feinstein actually violated the US Constitution by suggesting that the free exercise of one's religion is a disqualifying characteristic for serving on the bench. An actual direct violation of the First Amendment protections cimmitted by a sitting US senator in public without the least bit of chagrin.

A hatchet-job alleging moral failings by the contingent that believes in moral relativism is deliciously ironic.

You spelled committed wrong... as such, you're an idiot and your opinion is invalid.


Not only that, your insistence on being such a gop cock suck has gotten beyond ridiculous.

 

[BBX50]

regarding that home "remodel"

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ristine-fords-home-would-explain-second-door/


she LIED!

 

[BBX50]

You spelled committed wrong... as such, you're an idiot and your opinion is invalid.


Not only that, your insistence on being such a gop cock suck has gotten beyond ridiculous.

Im fucking sick and tired of your bull shit NIGGER

Get the fuck outahere!