Kreepy Kavanaugh

This story has been out for a day

Third Kavanaugh Accuser Sued by Former Employer for Sexually Harassing Two Male Colleagues.

One would assume its germaine to this thread

Has ALGO et all posted it?

NO?

Why?

WE KNOW WHY!
 
This story has stuck with me. I remember the first time you told it to me. I was disturbed beyond belief. I remember telling you over the phone to stop recalling the details to me - that it was upsetting me. You told me some females like that kind of thing and that maybe she was enjoying herself. I didn’t believe that. In my mind something was either broken in her or she had no idea what she was doing because of being totally and completely inebriated or at a loss of her facilities for whatever reason.

You laughed about it all - the girl, the train, the line. - I was disturbed for weeks. Maybe I took your candor and humor at the details in the wrong way. I’m sure it was the amusement of my horrified reaction that you were chuckling at. This week that story of yours Was once again in the forfront of my mind. And now, here it is in writing but the tone has changed :( #metoo

Out of the thousands and thousands of photos, shared videos, FaceTime and phone calls we’ve racked up, that was The only bad conversation. Well, except for the times you were in trouble and I was yelling at you ;)

Hi Mona! :kiss:

When we spoke, in my mind, the woman in the room was there on her own terms and own free will. She was the one in control. The line in the hallway were her pawns to be used for her pleasure and then sent packing. Please keep that in mind when describing my laughing, humor, and candor.

This took place 25 years ago. Time changes us. Also, and no excuse, I was drinking and partying my ass off. My memories of those days are more than a little hazy.

Some things time does not change. No has always meant no to me. Playtime is about willingness and lust between all the participants. What was so painfully described by Dr. Ford on Thursday falls way outside of acceptable.
 
Hi Mona! :kiss:

When we spoke, in my mind, the woman in the room was there on her own terms and own free will. She was the one in control. The line in the hallway were her pawns to be used for her pleasure and then sent packing. Please keep that in mind when describing my laughing, humor, and candor.

This took place 25 years ago. Time changes us. Also, and no excuse, I was drinking and partying my ass off. My memories of those days are more than a little hazy.

Some things time does not change. No has always meant no to me. Playtime is about willingness and lust between all the participants. What was so painfully described by Dr. Ford on Thursday falls way outside of acceptable.

Agreed!

I hope you didn’t take what I said wrong. I was not insinuating that you could ever, in any way at all, be a creep who didn’t take no for an answer. I know you very well and know that you would never, ever do anything against a woman’s wishes.

My post was a knee jerk reaction to seeing that disturbing story again.
 



by Francis Menton, Esq.
("Manhattan Contrarian")



"...It’s not my purpose to weigh in on the credibility contest between Judge Kavanaugh and his main accuser, Christine Blasey Ford. What’s more notable to me is that the Democrats, to a person, have shown that they care so desperately about stopping this guy. It’s not just that the principal accusation in question is so old, and so completely uncorroborated, and involving people of such a young age, that I would never have thought that Senators of either party would have brought a witness like this forward in such a context. But then there are all the surrounding indicia of no-holds-barred fight to the death: holding the accusation secret for six weeks and then springing it on the eve of a vote in a Hail Mary play for delay; dishonoring the accuser’s request for anonymity and turning her into roadkill of proceedings where all that counts is momentary political advantage; the sudden last-minute emergence of multiple additional accusers, each more preposterous than the next, including one alleging that the nominee organized a dozen or so gang rape parties..."





A graduate of Yale College, Menton is a retired partner of Wilkie, Farr & Gallagher LLP



 



by Francis Menton, Esq.
("Manhattan Contrarian")



"...It’s not my purpose to weigh in on the credibility contest between Judge Kavanaugh and his main accuser, Christine Blasey Ford. What’s more notable to me is that the Democrats, to a person, have shown that they care so desperately about stopping this guy. It’s not just that the principal accusation in question is so old, and so completely uncorroborated, and involving people of such a young age, that I would never have thought that Senators of either party would have brought a witness like this forward in such a context. But then there are all the surrounding indicia of no-holds-barred fight to the death: holding the accusation secret for six weeks and then springing it on the eve of a vote in a Hail Mary play for delay; dishonoring the accuser’s request for anonymity and turning her into roadkill of proceedings where all that counts is momentary political advantage; the sudden last-minute emergence of multiple additional accusers, each more preposterous than the next, including one alleging that the nominee organized a dozen or so gang rape parties..."





A graduate of Yale College, Menton is a retired partner of Wilkie, Farr & Gallagher LLP




What makes you think anyone gives a shit about what your fellow science denier thinks, or his parroting of Republican talking points? :confused:
 
Life in a Gynocracy

"The "process" of memorializing Ford's testimony involved a strange inversion of constitutional norms: The idea of a statute of limitations is ossified; hearsay is legitimate testimony; inexact and contradictory recall is proof of trauma, and therefore of validity; the burden of proof is on the accused, not the accuser; detail and evidence are subordinated to assumed sincerity; proof that one later relates an allegation to another is considered proof that the assault actually occurred in the manner alleged; motive is largely irrelevant; the accuser establishes the guidelines of the state's investigation of the allegations; and the individual allegation gains credence by cosmic resonance with all other such similar allegations."

Victor Davis Hanson
 


We know she requested anonymity.


Did she change her mind or was her mind changed for her?
How did the WaPo get her name?



 


We know she requested anonymity.


Did she change her mind or was her mind changed for her?
How did the WaPo get her name?




That was a bogus claim all along.
She was anonymous and then she decided to dabble in politics.

As we all know, and as the saying goes, once the camel gets its nose under the tent...
 


We know she requested anonymity.


Did she change her mind or was her mind changed for her?
How did the WaPo get her name?




We know you and everyone else calling her a liar are deeply concerned only about this point.

We know you want to pick everything apart, as you do with other things, rather than looking at the big picture.

So many allegations.

So many lies told.

So many supporters jumping ship.
 
We know you and everyone else calling her a liar are deeply concerned only about this point.

We know you want to pick everything apart, as you do with other things, rather than looking at the big picture.

So many allegations.

So many lies told.

So many supporters jumping ship.

Sad old soon to be dead assholes are sad.
 
We know you and everyone else calling her a liar are deeply concerned only about this point.

We know you want to pick everything apart, as you do with other things, rather than looking at the big picture.

So many allegations.

So many lies told.

So many supporters jumping ship.

My goodness, but you are fucked up:(
 
We know you and everyone else calling her a liar are deeply concerned only about this point.

We know you want to pick everything apart, as you do with other things, rather than looking at the big picture.

So many allegations.

So many lies told.

So many supporters jumping ship.

someone bring up an "issue" of 35 yrs ago with NO memory of KEY events ...no proof...all the persons she named as BEING there, DENY IT.....

what would you call her?

tell us

its OK

we'll wait:cool:
 
of her LIES, DELUSIONS and teh DUMZ.....a "vivtim" that claims it impacts her daily life, suffers PTSD from it, yet DIDNT tell her "husband" for ELEVEN YEARS

really?


but seriously

someone bring up an "issue" of 35 yrs ago with NO memory of KEY events ...no proof...all the persons she named as BEING there, DENY IT.....

what would you call her?
 
Back
Top