LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Woman sues Samsung for $1.8M after her mobile phone got stuck in her vagina

BoyNextDoor

BoyNextDoor

I hate liars
Joined
Apr 19, 2010
Posts
14,158
No really

Apparently there should be a warning label on all phones that sticking them in orifices is risky behavior, according to her lawyer:

“Samsung is definitely at fault here as they offer no warning about the dangers and potential risks during the insertion of their products inside their clients male or female body cavities or genitals” Salma Briant’s lawyer, Jim McAfee said in court.

Maybe Darwin was wrong and there is a god with a screwed up sense of humor.
 
BoyNextDoor said:
No really

Apparently there should be a warning label on all phones that sticking them in orifices is risky behavior, according to her lawyer:

“Samsung is definitely at fault here as they offer no warning about the dangers and potential risks during the insertion of their products inside their clients male or female body cavities or genitals” Salma Briant’s lawyer, Jim McAfee said in court.

Maybe Darwin was wrong and there is a god with a screwed up sense of humor.
Click to expand...

Actually, in my legal opinion, this exact situation really is something the manufacturers reasonably should have anticipated when they added the "vibrate mode" feature.
 
If she wins and is awarded anything above 2¢ the US tort law system will be the laughingstock of the world.



Oh, it already is.......
 
So the terrorist didn't try and smuggle grenades up his ass, either? :(

Ignorance is bliss.
 
BoyNextDoor said:
No really

Apparently there should be a warning label on all phones that sticking them in orifices is risky behavior, according to her lawyer:

“Samsung is definitely at fault here as they offer no warning about the dangers and potential risks during the insertion of their products inside their clients male or female body cavities or genitals” Salma Briant’s lawyer, Jim McAfee said in court.

Maybe Darwin was wrong and there is a god with a screwed up sense of humor.
Click to expand...

Fucks sake, Vette Jr that's a satire site.
Does anyone pay any attention at all anymore? I mean you couldn't tell by the other stories on the sidebar?
I've lost all hope.
 
Sy_Snootles said:
Fucks sake, Vette Jr that's a satire site.
Does anyone pay any attention at all anymore? I mean you couldn't tell by the other stories on the sidebar?
I've lost all hope.
Click to expand...

So sorry to have let you down. Please accept my humblest apologies.
 
Understanding this is satire, it leads me to wonder:

Can anyone imagine a commercial product, not designed to be inserted into a body cavity, where such a suit would be potentially legitimate?

Remember Mattel’s Harry Potter Nimbus 2000 “flying” Broom?
 
Baby boy, this has got to be the Onion, right?


At what point do folks take personal responsibility?

The stupid foolish twit, hopefully it is thrown out in court.
 
Last edited:
nowisthetime said:
Baby boy, this has got to be the Onion, right?


At what point do folks take personal responsibility?

The stupid fooliah twit, hopefully it is thrown out in court.
Click to expand...

It was click bait and I fell for it. After the woman getting $1 million from Mc Donald's for burning her crotch with a hot coffee I just thought this was the digital age version. But I got snookered.

whomp - whomp.

But I did make Sy_Snootles cry, so there is that.
 
BoyNextDoor said:
It was click bait and I fell for it. After the woman getting $1 million from Mc Donald's for burning her crotch with a hot coffee I just thought this was the digital age version. But I got snookered.

whomp - whomp.

But I did make Sy_Snootles cry, so there is that.
Click to expand...


It's ok, happens to the best of us!

You never know these days! Too much tomfoolery going on.
 
Takes "hands free calling" to a whole new level. Wonder what the receptions like in there.
 
BoyNextDoor said:
It was click bait and I fell for it. After the woman getting $1 million from Mc Donald's for burning her crotch with a hot coffee I just thought this was the digital age version. But I got snookered.
Click to expand...

Dude, you did not just go there.

That case is now taught in law school. Not because it was a frivolous suit, but how McDonalds launched a smear campaign to turn the woman into a public laughstock, then acted like the Cock of the Walk in the courtroom, and rightly got their asses handed to them by the jury.

Because McDonalds gave her a cup of coffee so fucking hot it was near boiling, and when she spilled it, it melted her skin and her vagina off. Three degree burns from water.

McDonalds was grossly negligent in that case. People who still believe otherwise are fucking ignorant.
 
Oblimo said:
Dude, you did not just go there.

That case is now taught in law school. Not because it was a frivolous suit, but how McDonalds launched a smear campaign to turn the woman into a public laughstock, then acted like the Cock of the Walk in the courtroom, and rightly got their asses handed to them by the jury.

Because McDonalds gave her a cup of coffee so fucking hot it was near boiling, and when she spilled it, it melted her skin and her vagina off. Three degree burns from water.

McDonalds was grossly negligent in that case. People who still believe otherwise are fucking ignorant.
Click to expand...

Yes people still believe that was a frivolous suit. Still see it brought up all the time. Usually by the same people who take the Onion and WND seriously.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top