Okay, service subs... discuss?

lark sparrow

Literotica Guru
Joined
Oct 11, 2002
Posts
1,715
Midori


Draft of essay.
This essay originally appeared in Spectator magazine (www.spectatormag.com) for my monthly column, Babylon Bound.

Copyright: Midori 2003
Working Title: In the Quixotic Search of a Slave

I am a romantic at heart. No, really, I mean it.

No, I'm not the "long walks on the beach" type of romantic. Nor am I the heart shaped box of chocolate kind of woman. I'd rather make you craw through the sand while I sit under a parasol or carve a bloody heart into your back. Actually, I'm the kind of romantic that wants you to hold that parasol on the beach over me for as long as I desire. I'm the kind of romantic that wants you to hand serve the box of chocolate on a silver plate as you present it to me on bended knee.

I'm that kind of a romantic.

Service has been on my mind lately. To be honest, it's been on my mind since I was a little one, in some way shape or form, but it's just been in the forefront of my thoughts lately. Service is a particular form of submission within the galaxy of personal erotic expression and relationships called SM and Leather. It holds a very special place in my heart - a very romantic place. So what's Service and what's so special about it? More importantly why do I spend so much of my time in search of the right Service for me? What's the turn-on for this Diva?

I'll admit, this may possibly a narcissistic pleasure that I pursue. Simply put, I wish to have in my keep a woman or a man who derives pleasure, satisfaction and sense of purpose from providing me with the best ministration to my needs as they know how. I would go as far as to say that I seek to own a person as a servant, a slave, bound to me by sense of duty and devotion. This is not slavery that comes from coercion by force or economic pressure. It is not the sort of slavery that men, women and children are forced into in the past and today as the result of political and economic imperialism or caste based oppression. The desire to serve should well up in the heart of the servant like an eternal fountain, whether it's there constantly or inspired by a key individual. They shall be motivated by a need to be useful. . . and I dream improbably that they really desire to put my needs above theirs.

Service in itself is the end, not the means to an end. This is an important distinction. Often people will offer service to the person that they desire, believing that it's the ticket to some other benefit. Maybe they want to have sex with the potential dominant. Maybe they want to have a more traditional dyad love relationship. Maybe they want to be supported financially with room and board in exchange for work. In each of these cases they use Service simply as a tool to get to another desired outcome in the relationship. In a sense they are using the outward appearance of service as a commodity to be traded for other goods or services. It's a quid pro quo. The motivation of the service provider, in these cases, is centered around the manipulation of the act of service and manipulation of the dominant with a goal in mind that is only indirectly related to that dominant. Frankly it would be much easier if they just came out and asked me if I wanted to have sex with them. It would be so much easier if the needs were clearly stated so that both people can balance their needs and desires with each other. Instead they use the act of service and get my hopes up that maybe, just maybe, they may be the 'one.'

Service is not a fantasy role-playing scene for me. I do not want to have a pretend game of having a French Maid tottering around my house and call it Service. French Maid scenes, or other similar domestic servant role play or slave fantasy scenes are fun for an erotic evening's entertainment. I have enjoyed boys and girls in that role as I play the Lady of the House. I even own several such costumes with heels and corsets, petticoats and dresses for just such occasion. French Maids of this sort are best bound up, bent over and thoroughly thrashed or sexually savaged. As they teeter on impossible high heels, delicately maneuver around in fragile stockings and worry about the sexual quality of the up-turn of their booty as they pour tea, they aren't much useful of anything other than precariously served tea and perverse fucking. The French Maid in such a situation is very rarely useful in actually taking care of my needs. They're not likely to schlep my luggage, wash my car, run errands, clean cat litter or be my bodyguard. I end up protecting them from unwanted attention of offending bystanders as they giggle girlishly. This could be fun for a few hours in an evening. It does not, however, help me in making my life easier when I'm dashing around enabling their helplessness.

(My apologies to the exceptional service maids such as Sissy for using the example of the French Maid in a way that may be perceived as derogatory. You, the dedicated service maids, are a rare and precious breed!)

Perhaps I seek the impossible. I want a person who is motivated by loyalty, devotion, honor and a selfless sense of usefulness. I seek a person who is happy to not be the center of my life, universe and all consuming attention but rather be a silently appreciated, integral part of my life. In an oversimplified model, my fantasy is that this person will be like my right arm. I do not think of my right arm at all times. It is a part of me and I know that it is there to serve my needs and desires as my extension. I do not need to pet my right arm so that it may work well. (Although my right arm may be used to pet me so I may feel good!) This is a form of objectification. I'm aware of this. This is the sort of fantasy from which the desire to own, be served and posses arises, but then it's modulated by reason and tempered by reality.

But everyone wants to be desired, right? So could I ever find a person who lives to serve like my arm? This improbability is what makes my pursuit of Service fundamentally romantic. Romance by classic definition isn't about love leading to marriage. It's "a narrative in verse or prose, written in a vernacular language in the Middle Ages, dealing with strange and exciting adventures of chivalrous heroes." It's about "idealized events remote from everyday life." It's a notion full of idealized relationships of purity, beauty, intensity and epic heroes. By definition it's extra-ordinary. It's an absurd, extravagant and delusional quest.

I know this. Yet I continue to search like Don Quixote. Instead of the monster disguised as windmills, I am searching for my very own Sancho Panza. I seek the Japanese warrior on devoted to the notion of bushido and loyal to his lord. The knight willing to sacrifice for this Lady must be out there. The Roman General, who swears allegiance to Cesar, served with the sort honor and strength that I idolize. If I feel this way, then perhaps a complimentary person is out there, matching my needs with his or her own life-long hunger. The root of my desire is not rational, reasonable or fair. The execution of this desire, however, must necessarily be ruled by my own honor and ethics if I'm to 'rule' another. In this notion, the potential for narcissism in seeking Service is negated.

How did I get this way?

Blame it on my mother and my grandmother. My grandfather, I was told, served my grandmother hand and foot. My mother, the professor, always had acolytes in the form of TAs, taking care of her, attending to her, focusing and sacrificing for her. My grandmother ruled with competence, confidence, a sense of entitlement and perhaps more than a touch of domineering demeanor. She was the drill sergeant and ruthless commander. My mother led her merry band with beauty and near naïve grace of an uber-intellectual. She was the master of her art whose students sought simply to learn by spending time with her and serving her. We were poor, yet somehow both the women in my life ended up with what is essentially Service submissives, devotees or functional servants. An odd situation, I realize. The model for the relationship was right there before my very own eyes, but the training to be a good owner or master was not available. So I turned to the next available model of Service, Dominance and submission. The military, both past and present: The Generals of Rome, the Samurai to the Emperor and the Army team-members to the Sergeant or Chief were my role models. (Lieutenants? Forget them! They're 'frag-able.') Here enters the notion of leadership responsibility, honor and ethics of the dominant into my previously unilateral fantasy of ownership. Here the romance of chivalry blooms.

In the end, I seek to form a mutually fulfilling operating unit of well-meshed desires and needs, where I will be served as I lead and teach while they will serve as they find strength and fulfillment.

Recently I was asked if a person's service to me turned me on or aroused me. The answer we easy. Sexually? No. But good service executed gracefully with a sense of pride and peace feeds me with a surge of strength. It makes me happy. It is not sexual, it is something other than sexual, but profoundly fulfilling. I can understand that the erotic component would be the primary driver for Service if the end goal was some sort of sexual fulfillment within a scene. But a relationship's longevity can't be based upon the moment to moment rush of sexual gratification. I'm looking for a unique relationship with staying power.

For that matter, sexual contact in a Service relationship with me is not automatic. It usually isn't even a consideration for me. If I choose to have that with a Service person, so be it. But a demand or assumption for sexual access is sure to be received with decided drop in the room temperature around me and a door closed on their ass.

It is the romantic notion of an idealized power exchange that I seek. So I roam upon my steed across the oft barren landscape of pervs and dunes of freaks in search for the one that's right for me, the one who bears the mark in their heart "in service to Midori."

In Leather Pride

Midori

If you want to catch the last installment or the archives of eNewletters, read some articles I've written or check my travel schedule, just drop by the Fire Horse Productions, Inc site at http://srv.ezinedirector.net/?n=352732&s=11571031

If you have any questions, comments, feedback, or you just want to meet other like-minded people around the globe (ok, so mainly people who've been to my classes but they do range from Denmark to Australia) join the discussion at my yahoo group called DivaMidori ( it is Adult Access only) the URL is: http://srv.ezinedirector.net/?n=352733&s=11571031

Don't forget to check out some of the new images at my bondage art site BeautyBound.com http://srv.ezinedirector.net/?n=352734&s=11571031


In Leather Pride

Midori



Update Member Info:
http://ezinedirector.com/subscriber/member_profile/?skid=11571031

P.S. I have tried to include every link possible and I hope this is okay to copy and paste for thought and discussion!!
 
i know this should be good. i am an advocate of service and believed in it completely. i haven't read the article yet, but i will when i can read with more appreciation. A Midori article is worth being alert for every word.

lara
 
Wonderful...thank you for sharing that, Midori has always held a place of esteem for me and that just reminds me of why :)
 
Interesting this should come up today.

I don't mind some quid-pro-quo. It's nice to think that someone might be so disciplined as to serve without a thought as to themself, but it's not necessarily my paradigm.

I'll keep my day with R- instead. Cute little butch, put such a nice effort into my laundry bathroom and shoe collection. and I sent her home freshly screwed and gratified.

She wasn't expecting it. B, her partner and an occasional plaything of mine warned her, I don't feel compelled to get the service bottom off...

but I sure like to be unpredictable. So R went home with her orgasm, I got in my whipping and a clean bathroom to boot.

Quid pro quo....it doesn't suck.
 
ok ... i read it.

Service provides a satisfaction in of itself ... apart from sexual satisfaction. There is enjoyment in providing another exactly what they need, when they need it. A sense of pride develops from service, particularly when the beneficiary of the service is pleased and without complaint. An absent-minded, sated (not necessarily sexually sated) pat on the head and a "good girl" can go a mile.

i find this portion of the essay very telling:

"Service in itself is the end, not the means to an end. This is an important distinction. Often people will offer service to the person that they desire, believing that it's the ticket to some other benefit. Maybe they want to have sex with the potential dominant. Maybe they want to have a more traditional dyad love relationship. Maybe they want to be supported financially with room and board in exchange for work. In each of these cases they use Service simply as a tool to get to another desired outcome in the relationship. In a sense they are using the outward appearance of service as a commodity to be traded for other goods or services. It's a quid pro quo. The motivation of the service provider, in these cases, is centered around the manipulation of the act of service and manipulation of the dominant with a goal in mind that is only indirectly related to that dominant. Frankly it would be much easier if they just came out and asked me if I wanted to have sex with them. It would be so much easier if the needs were clearly stated so that both people can balance their needs and desires with each other. Instead they use the act of service and get my hopes up that maybe, just maybe, they may be the 'one.'"

Nail meet hammer.

i think it is tough for anyone (those who don't have the pre-disposition to serve others) to put their needs on the back burner in order to completely care for another. But, if doing so provides a such a sense of contentment and balance, i say revel in it and do your best make the Dominant purr from your care. If you are looking to get a reward for being "exceptional service" sub, you will end up disappointed every time. To look for a reward outside of your personal satisfaction is setting yourself up for an ugly disappointment.

lara
 
Netzach said:
She wasn't expecting it. B, her partner and an occasional plaything of mine warned her, I don't feel compelled to get the service bottom off...

but I sure like to be unpredictable. So R went home with her orgasm, I got in my whipping and a clean bathroom to boot.

Quid pro quo....it doesn't suck.

Is it quid pro quo in this case?
 
well it's not apples to apples. Though, you know...big dirty secret out....

if she needed her bathroom cleaned and her cat fed someday, I'd probably do it.

I think she knows that. I think that's why she was happy to do it, on some level. That classic D/s quid pro quo....you let me use you, I'll take care of you.

I don't have much compulsion for people to serve me just to bask in the wonderfulness that is me. I don't think that really is adequate justification. I have my share of unfabulous days, and it's interesting to me, not to pick at Midori, but it seems no sex-educator-prodomme is ever less than optimum, based on their writings.

They hint at it sometimes....

but there are days that are worse for me than just a bad hair day, days when I sure as fuck would not serve me, I would not even give me the time of day. I think that's universal.

Guess I'm the cranky Domme.
 
Last edited:
I enjoy serving Sir, it's just part of our life together, I do lots of things for him basically without thinking...cooking, cleaning, laundry, coffee at his side when he wakes up, toweling him off when he leaves the shower, etc. etc.

However, he often expresses his appreciation either verbally or with a pat, stroke, or more. I quite sincerely do not do things for him because I am looking for the "thank you"...however, if no appreciation was EVER expressed, I don't know if I'd love him like I do.

I would think for someone to be someone else's "right arm" they would have to have NO other life of their own- no job, no kids, no possessions to take care of, no responsibilities of their own. Does that person exist, and if so, is that person desirable? I would think not to most people.

- justina
 
Netzach said:
well it's not apples to apples. Though, you know...big dirty secret out....

if she needed her bathroom cleaned and her cat fed someday, I'd probably do it.

I think she knows that. I think that's why she was happy to do it, on some level. That classic D/s quid pro quo....you let me use you, I'll take care of you.

I don't have much compulsion for people to serve me just to bask in the wonderfulness that is me. I don't think that really is adequate justification. I have my share of unfabulous days, and it's interesting to me, not to pick at Midori, but it seems no sex-educator-prodomme is ever less than optimum, based on their writings.

They hint at it sometimes....

but there are days that are worse for me than just a bad hair day, days when I sure as fuck would not serve me, I would not even give me the time of day. I think that's universal.

Guess I'm the cranky Domme.

lol well I don't know, I think the working title as well as the ensuing words point to the romantic nature of the quest. I'm not sure it's simply basking in the wonderfulness of the Domme in full ultimately, but in the satisfaction in service rather than, you do this for me, and I do this for you. Romantic in an unconventional sense, sure... but I don't think that's denied in the piece. I didn't get the sense that she was looking for the basking but for someone who was ultimately dedicated to the service without the hidden agenda. Again, perhaps a mere figment of imagination... but there is some, though relatively little, talk about service and being a service sub here... thought it was interesting point, however far-fetched.
 
Serviced minded submissives are a rare breed actually. One of the misconceptions in owning such a jewel is that the Dominant leads a life of lazy luxury while the submissive toils and serves without any thought but the ease and pleasure of their Mistress/Master.

I will concede that the submissive will do all of the drudgery work when where and how the Dominant dictates but never miss the fact that simply organizing the day of the submissive and the service required can be complex and thought provoking if it is to satisfy the kinks of both in one way or another.

In My particular world a command to vacumm the carpet will also be mini managed with an extra twist of BDSM...perhaps while wearing the spreader bar a rubber hood and butt ass naked. Thinking a little further about this routine task...a Dominant will generally issue the vacumming order at least once a week but will often change the BDSM aspect weekly as well so that the task is not only done well but relished.

If there is not at the very least a small reward, pat on the head...good girl/boy...or reprimands for sloppy work the relationship simply slips into a one way road to nowhere.


In fantasy Midori is reading My mind!
 
I can't say it has ever appealed to me. I can see why it would appeal to others, but I suspect I would find it irritating. I am fiercely independent, and I even find it annoying having someone pick up after me or do my laundry.

One of the reasons I hate staying in hotels long term.

So... it's an interesting article, but doesn't appeal personally. (Although the bit about what to do with a French Maid does!)
 
Alas I'm not a purely service oriented sub. I understand the thrust of the article and that these folks exist but I also agree that they would have to be devoid of many daily obligations to fully able to comply. Although I suppose there is some wiggle room wherein the service sub derives pleasure from the service when the opportunity presents itself.

However, I think that only being able to serve on an occasional basis would be an extremely difficult thing for this type person. I guess in my mind I see a completely service-sub as one who would want to so constantly and continuously. Hard to do with outside distractions. I think this type of submission closely paralells slavery.

I enjoy completing tasks assigned by Wife (and even one's that are not but that I know will make her day better or life easier) but am not to the point of total servitude just for the sake of servitude. Just not my gig.

I do not use my service to achieve any hidden agenda. My agenda is blantantly obvious. It is not to achieve sexual gratification as regardless of my actions and behavious that decision lies with Wife. My agenda is just to make Wife happy. To see her smile. Or to just know that by having say the bedroom nice and clean it is one less thing she need concern herself with.

Would I kneel naked on a beach and hold her parasol without thought of return gratification? Most likely. Well for about 20 minutes that is. Being of Irish/Swedish decent I don't tolerate sun well...lol. But could I see myself being a totally dedicated to nothing but service? No.
 
in service

in reading the posts re: service, i had to jump in, and make mention.

i myself only, do, domestic service.
but it involves all the heavy grunt work also. i do it all alone, for my Mistress.
i do the whole inside/both yards front and back, and any other things She comes up with.
i have been here now, for 9 months, real time.
and i personally am just happy, to see, a clean house and presentable yard.
i do not expect/ nor ask for/ anything else. as long as my Mistress is contented and happy, it is all i seek.
this house is clean enough to eat off the floor and relaxing enough for company.

i have been service oriented from day 1, and i find very few other slaves doing what i do, no sexual contents, no lovey dovey smootchie poo, no emotional bonding like most people you hear of or come in contact with.


most people i talk to say i am nuts. "no rewards of any kind?"
no, i am just happy to see a job well done. i know most will say they don't believe me, but that is okay too.
lizzie/slave to Ms Ann/#377109
 
in service

in reading the posts re: service, i had to jump in, and make mention.

i myself only, do, domestic service.
but it involves all the heavy grunt work also. i do it all alone, for my Mistress.
i do the whole inside/both yards front and back, and any other things She comes up with.
i have been here now, for 9 months, real time.
and i personally am just happy, to see, a clean house and presentable yard.
i do not expect/ nor ask for/ anything else. as long as my Mistress is contented and happy, it is all i seek.
this house is clean enough to eat off the floor and relaxing enough for company.

i have been service oriented from day 1, and i find very few other slaves doing what i do, no sexual contents, no lovey dovey smootchie poo, no emotional bonding like most people you hear of or come in contact with.


most people i talk to say i am nuts. "no rewards of any kind?"
no, i am just happy to see a job well done. i know most will say they don't believe me, but that is okay too.
lizzie/slave to Ms Ann/#377109
 
in service

in reading the posts re: service, i had to jump in, and make mention.

i myself only, do, domestic service.
but it involves all the heavy grunt work also. i do it all alone, for my Mistress.
i do the whole inside/both yards front and back, and any other things She comes up with.
i have been here now, for 9 months, real time.
and i personally am just happy, to see, a clean house and presentable yard.
i do not expect/ nor ask for/ anything else. as long as my Mistress is contented and happy, it is all i seek.
this house is clean enough to eat off the floor and relaxing enough for company.

i have been service oriented from day 1, and i find very few other slaves doing what i do, no sexual contents, no lovey dovey smootchie poo, no emotional bonding like most people you hear of or come in contact with.


most people i talk to say i am nuts. "no rewards of any kind?"
no, i am just happy to see a job well done. i know most will say they don't believe me, but that is okay too.
lizzie/slave to Ms Ann/#377109
 
I can see where the draw is to be a service sub, but I know it's not something I could do on a 24/7 basis, even when He and I live together. I will probably do some service work for Him just to know that he doesn't have to worry about it, but I am too independent to devote my entire life to serving him. Especially if I didn't get the occassional pat on the head or thank you.
 
For service subs (and service sub lovers), I heartily recommend Robert Coover's "Spanking the Maid" - post modern, literary, knowing and quite funny. From the dust jacket synopsis:

"Each morning, the maid arrives in the master's bedroom with her cleaning paraphernalia, hoping to make this day's round of work the perfect one...And each day, the master can only notice the maid's failures and so must, in obedience to his 'manual', administer her punishment, assuring her that it is an obligation to an ideal of a higher order that compels him..."
 
Shadowsdream said:
Serviced minded submissives are a rare breed actually. One of the misconceptions in owning such a jewel is that the Dominant leads a life of lazy luxury while the submissive toils and serves without any thought but the ease and pleasure of their Mistress/Master.

I will concede that the submissive will do all of the drudgery work when where and how the Dominant dictates but never miss the fact that simply organizing the day of the submissive and the service required can be complex and thought provoking if it is to satisfy the kinks of both in one way or another.

In My particular world a command to vacumm the carpet will also be mini managed with an extra twist of BDSM...perhaps while wearing the spreader bar a rubber hood and butt ass naked. Thinking a little further about this routine task...a Dominant will generally issue the vacumming order at least once a week but will often change the BDSM aspect weekly as well so that the task is not only done well but relished.

A service-oriented sub is a breed I've never personally dealth with, and I'm not sure I'd know what to do with one. The kind of assignment Shadowsdream described would be a punishment in my world. I can't say I'd like to have a sub like this, either; I'm not casting any aspersions to service-oriented subs or the dom/mes who prefer them, please understand, but I don't think it would make my amps squeal either.

I guess the kind of service I prefer from a sub falls into the realm of personal attention - help me bathe, rub my feet, and so on. Sometimes this is most of the scene, but more often the real scene starts afterward.

Come to think of it, there is one way in which my husband acts like a service-oriented sub. It takes several applications of coffee to turn me into a human being after I get up, and he takes care me when the only things I can do are grunt and lift the cup. :D
 
I personally don't understand the motivation of service-only subs. I think everyone needs love, and I feel that those who give themselves completely to one person who does not reciprocate by loving them (and expressing it) are denying themselves something truly vital to human survival.
 
Etoile said:
I personally don't understand the motivation of service-only subs. I think everyone needs love, and I feel that those who give themselves completely to one person who does not reciprocate by loving them (and expressing it) are denying themselves something truly vital to human survival.

Agreed...I find it difficult to imagine wanting myself, but can relate to some people who have been through a particularly traumatic time in their life maybe finding this as an option for them where they can have contact, be around another, can feel useful/needed, but not have to give more than they are psychologically and/or emotionally able to in that space in time. Sometimes it feels as if there is no more to give apart from physical work, a therapy in itself of sorts. Maybe not the ideal motivation in all cases, and not applicable to all service subs, but could act as a good way of keeping some sort of grip on reality and surviving. Hope I never go there, but have had times where I have come close, times when it felt there was no more to give emotionally.

Catalina :rose:
 
OTOH, I can see how one would crave this type of service. In reading the article, I can see how particular subs would find solace in a job well done, in pleasing the Master, in fulfilling needs of others. In a case such as this, the sub would crave the attention, acknowledgement and praise from the Master, but the denial of same would keep the sub coming back if only for that nod, that muttered thanks, that occasional spoken word of praise. A little bit of that goes a long, long way.
 
Back
Top