Kreepy Kavanaugh

I have reviewed my Calendars from my High School Years.

There are NO REFERENCES to any Rapes.

Not even One.

Okay...where's my new gavel?
 
Apparently Dems. approached Ramirez, after they found some papertrail:


So it looks like something Did happen at a party.
For me, the issue becomes: do we believe Ramirez's version of events (attempted assault), or did she distort facts? Then and/or now.
I go with the latter.

I'm suspicious that her version of events was watered down,
because it seemed that at the time another version of the same event was being circulated amongst frat boys and the gossip vine.

I'm also influenced by the fact that I Was in the vicinity of such a drama, in which someone watered down their version of events once the gossip started spreading. Out of fear that it might ruin their reputation and marriage, even livelihood.


Which isn't to say that rape isn't the most underreported crime, and that most rape (attempted or completed) accusations aren't genuine.
Which is why I tend to believe Christine Ford.
.
 
I'm suspicious that her version of events was watered down,
because it seemed that at the time another version of the same event was being circulated amongst frat boys and the gossip vine.

I'm also influenced by the fact that I Was in the vicinity of such a drama, in which someone watered down their version of events once the gossip started spreading. Out of fear that it might ruin their reputation and marriage, even livelihood.


Which isn't to say that rape isn't the most underreported crime, and that most rape (attempted or completed) accusations aren't genuine.
Which is why I tend to believe Christine Ford.
.

With this mentality due process and the presumption of innocence is dead.

Torquemada made the accused testify first as well. Democrats know well how that upped his prosecution percentage.
 
Last edited:
With this mentality due process and the presumption of innocence is dead.

Torquemada made the accused testify first as well. Democrats know how well how that upped his prosecution percentage.

What mentality?
Something apparently DID happen then, they have the papertrail for it.
(Unless, of course it's all fabricated)

 
What mentality?
Something apparently DID happen then, they have the papertrail for it.
(Unless, of course it's all fabricated)

The absolute belief in accusation without corroborating evidence, that mentality. Nothing apparently "did" happened if there is no evidence or sworn testimony to prove it. Blind faith isn't enough.

And it all could be fabricated. The NYTs tried and failed to prove the Yale accusations.
 
Doesn't matter to Democrats. They do not want the Constitution upheld from the SCOTUS. After all this is how they impose those agenda items on the rest of us they can't achieve in the democratic legislative process.

I'll say this for you. When you drink the kool aide - you take a big fucking gulp.
 
The absolute belief in accusation without corroborating evidence, that mentality. Nothing apparently "did" happened if there is no evidence or sworn testimony to prove it. Blind faith isn't enough.

And it all could be fabricated. The NYTs tried and failed to prove the Yale accusations.

Mine are just personal opinions and speculations.

Just like yours, spearchucker's, Agro's and Carnalflower's.

I tend to trust Ford but be circumspect about Ramirez (she was probably pushed into a corner by the Dem. media mob).

In saying that, indeed only a proper investigation would be able to shed a bit of light into what really happened.
 
Read some of the octothorp's posts here and you understand why #WhyIDidntReport has been trending for three days straight.

#RationalizedRape
 
Apparently Dems. approached Ramirez, after they found some papertrail:




So it looks like something Did happen at a party.
For me, the issue becomes: do we believe Ramirez's version of events (attempted assault), or did she distort facts? Then and/or now.
I go with the latter.

People who were at that party say it never happened. People who weren't at the party are spreading a juicy rumor.

So take your pick. Believe the rumor mongers or the first hand witness's.
 
https://twitter.com/robferdman/status/1044259470577201162?s=21

He later tweeted they did not confirm or deny it was a new woman. So there is that.

At this time, the Montgomery County Police Department has not received a request by any alleged victim nor a victim’s attorney to initiate a police report or a criminal investigation regarding Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

https://mont.thesentinel.com/2018/09/24/supreme-court-nominee-kavanaugh-faces-more-allegations/

Investigators in Montgomery County confirmed Monday they’re aware of a potential second sexual assault complaint in the county against former Georgetown Prep student and Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

While investigators weren’t specific and spoke on background, they said they are looking at allegations against Kavanaugh during his senior year in high school after an anonymous witness came forward this weekend.
 
People who were at that party say it never happened. People who weren't at the party are spreading a juicy rumor.

So take your pick. Believe the rumor mongers or the first hand witness's.


Time for Grassley to put a stop to the lynching and call for a vote.
 
The righties are circlejerking this thread into oblivion.

But there’s one question I need to ask RightGuide:

When you talk about convicting based on allegations, what about crimes where the only witness is the victim? Are you saying that a victim’s testimony must be corroborated in all cases and in all crimes? If so, what would you accept as corroborating evidence? If not, for what crimes is a victim’s testimony sufficient?

Thanks!

Other than that, fellas, enjoy your mutual reach-arounds.

http://oblimo.pbworks.com/f/SocialMediaCircleJerk.gif

(NYT is saying Rosenstein is having a Come to Jesus meeting on Thursday with the POTUS to decide his - Rosenstein’s, that is - fate.)
 
the victim was at the party and she said it happened.


People who were at that party say it never happened. People who weren't at the party are spreading a juicy rumor.

So take your pick. Believe the rumor mongers or the first hand witness's.
 
The righties are circlejerking this thread into oblivion.

http://oblimo.pbworks.com/f/SocialMediaCircleJerk.gif

Yes, they are engaging in the old Internet false game of whoever posts the most is right. It gives them comfort, I'm sure.

Their yap game in solidarity is strong when the holy Horn Of Desperation is sounded, I'll give them that.

https://78.media.tumblr.com/17c2f79ada3967d3af37b658374e6458/tumblr_nyarjonteC1qj6sk2o1_500.gif

:D
 
btw, the person to blame for this travesty is Don McGahn.

McGhan has been stacking the courts with all his old secret society and frat club buddies no matter how unqualified they are. Lest we forget, one guy he put up for a judgeship had never even argued a case and was rejected.

now the frat boy past has caught up to them, boo hoo
 
the victim was at the party and she said it happened.

How do you know that Ramirez was a victim and not a consensual adult who redacted her version of events post-humously, out of shame?

I'm not saying that it's necessarily true (only a thorough investigation would shed light into it).

But your guys' (Agro's, in particular) habit of becoming 100% convinced on the spot, and of using such words "rapist", "victim" based on "She said, he said", annoy the heck out of me .
Busybody is doing the same by calling Ford "a lying cunt", but at least he's cute.

I, too suspect that Ford is telling the truth. But I'm using words such as "I think that she did it". I'm not calling Kavanaugh "a rapist" until investigations are completed.
 
Because I read her account and I believe her. In this case, I am 100% convinced on the spot.

Don't pretend you're trying to be "fair" and "open-minded." You've already shown you're prejudiced by calling her "ungraciously" drunk and outright lying about what she said. You have issues, I suspect around girls who drink and party with boys. They must be asking for it or something like that.

I do believe her, but I also said I'm not sure this counts as sexual assault. It makes him a pig, not necessarily a criminal imo.

How do you know that Ramirez was a victim and not a consensual adult who redacted her version of events post-humously, out of shame?

I'm not saying that it's necessarily true (only a thorough investigation would shed light into it).

But your guys' (Agro's, in particular) habit of becoming 100% convinced on the spot, and of using such words "rapist", "victim" based on "She said, he said", annoy the heck out of me .
Busybody is doing the same by calling Ford "a lying cunt", but at least he's cute.

I, too suspect that Ford is telling the truth. But I'm using words such as "I think that she did it". I'm not calling Kavanaugh "a rapist" until investigations are completed.
 
Because I read her account and I believe her. In this case, I am 100% convinced on the spot.

Don't pretend you're trying to be "fair" and "open-minded." You've already shown you're prejudiced by calling her "ungraciously" drunk and outright lying about what she said. You have issues, I suspect around girls who drink and party with boys. They must be asking for it or something like that.

I do believe her, but I also said I'm not sure this counts as sexual assault. It makes him a pig, not necessarily a criminal imo.


Did you and Agro party with boys and got regularly shitfaced,
pretend play to suck fake penises, and had dicks put in front of your face too?

You two "feminists" seem to take it all S.o. P.e.r.s.o.n.a.l.l.y.
 
Back
Top