Kreepy Kavanaugh

All I see is you yammering abut him being under oath and taking the Fifth when there is no crime in play.

Maybe you should be a little more clear as to what your point is.

Okay. I’ll try one more time, then I’m going to make an appointment with my neurologist.

  • There is no statue of limitations on rape and sexual offenses against a minor in Maryland, other than Sexual Offense in the 4th Degree.
  • If Kavanaugh is compelled to testify, that might open the door to criminal investigation.
  • Thus, him testifying might put him in the untenable position of having to take the 5th or lie.
  • Thus, it might not be fair to require him to refute Dr. Ford’s testimony at all.
  • And, if it’s not fair to force him to testify, it would be equal unfair to hold his refusal to testify against him
 
And when I asked you for a cite, you fucking ignored me.

It was not deliberate ignoring, it was a mistake of ignorance. My apologies.

The law in Maryland was changed during the PromiseKeepers abuse scandal. I’ll grab the actual cite in a minute, but in the meantime, do you accept me quoting RightGuide?

Something I learned today changes the calculus to my mind: apparently, there is no statute of limitations for sexual abuse of a minor in Maryland.
"Felony" sexual abuse.
 
Prove to me your first bullet point.
You have yet to do that. You keep repeating it has literal truth, and it may be, but I prefer to see where you learned this from. I would also be interested in the definition of fourth degree.

I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO SEE A SINGLE BIT OF SOLID EVIDENCE!

The rest of your bullet points are well laid-out conjecture and wishful thinking.
It is impossible for him to lie about accusations of, I don't remember when, I don't remember where, my witnesses will not corroborate, in fact, it's just the opposite. If she cannot give a place, time or a single witness, then how can he possibly lie?

"I was never at some place, at some time, and even if I was, everyone says nothing happened."

No amount of investigation or interrogation can overcome the severe limitations of Ford's "memory."
 
I prefer not to remotely acknowledge you; however, you seem to have confusion with the word consent as well - given this is at least the second time you have discussed my life directly (your parental convo with Que) or indirectly (your statement prior to this).

I asked you before privately not to even mention a hint of me and yet you seem compelled to continue to do so. So publicly, stop.

I asked you to not be a self-absorbed psycho ex girlfriend yet here we are.
 
Which doesn't make you wonder why the Repugs (and Kavanaugh) wouldn't be pleased as punch to have it investigated? What do you think they're hiding? This is parallel to Trump constantly says "nothing on Russia to see here" as his colleagues continue to fall around him (with connections to the Russians).

Doesn't look to me that there's enough evidenced to pin Kavanaugh down as having done this. So, why are the Repugs running so scared and screwing themselves in November with their stance on this?

who has CONNECTIONS to the Russians?

tell me
 
Prove to me your first bullet point.
You have yet to do that. You keep repeating it has literal truth, and it may be, but I prefer to see where you learned this from. I would also be interested in the definition of fourth degree.

I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO SEE A SINGLE BIT OF SOLID EVIDENCE!

The rest of your bullet points are well laid-out conjecture and wishful thinking.
It is impossible for him to lie about accusations of, I don't remember when, I don't remember where, my witnesses will not corroborate, in fact, it's just the opposite. If she cannot give a place, time or a single witness, then how can he possibly lie?

"I was never at some place, at some time, and even if I was, everyone says nothing happened."

No amount of investigation or interrogation can overcome the severe limitations of Ford's "memory."

"well laid-out conjecture and wishful thinking"...?

Jesus Christ. :rolleyes:
 
Not to pile on simply because I've always found him irritating, but I was already considering wading in to his bullshit because his statements look exactly like those that were frequently spouted by those who we know very publicly that they are personally abusive to women.

Just because one ticks off all the right "pro-women" boxes with public statements agreeing with women politically says nothing at all about the level of respect that you treat women in private.

Similarly, 1000 women could come out and say that Kavenaugh never abused them personally and it's not the least bit exculpatory as to whether he did or did not in one particular instance. It is rare to the point of unheard of for abusers to have not a whisper of others being abused. It tends to be a pattern.

However, on the subject of whether he treats the women that he is personally and professionally involved with respect we have ample testimony. Not just the volume of women who have come forward and say so, they are quite specific about the ways in which he has been respectful and helpful to women.

I don't know of any women who similarly praise the sanctimonious poster who brags about "getting the wimmins."
 
If you write a new law, is it retroactive, or going forward?

And what is the definition of fourth degree?
 
She went to her congressional district representative, which is the natural place to start under the circumstances. (And this answers why she didn't go to Feinstein first. She could have, but that's not more logical to do with an issue that has political significance.) Her congressional representative is a woman and from the party most likely to give Ford what she wants--and going the political rather than the police route goes directly to the significance of the issue and what Ford wants out of it. There isn't anyone who's claiming this isn't being done for political reasons.

she could have gone to StinkCunt who WAS IN A POSITION to do more

but HERE is the reason

https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2018/...stein-is-shady-af/?utm_campaign=twitchywidget

to protect herself legally cause she is LYING
 
*chuckle*

Because she knew the politician would keep her secret safe...

What secret?

What a half-assed campaign of deflection you people are doing. She went to a Democratic politician (her own congressional representative) because the point is to stop the guy becoming a Supreme Court justice. She isn't taking him to court on the attempted rape charge; she just wants him not to become a Supreme Court justice, which is common cause with the congresswoman she contacted in the first place.

And the Repugs are being stupid in their response. The only significance of it being Kavanaugh is that he's the closest one to being willing to cover Trump's ass. They have qualified conservative candidates for the Supreme Court job in depth and if they had any brains they would be reining Trump in, not catering to him. They even have a more acceptable backup in place than Trump for the presidency. They're just being stubborn old farts.

Whatever happens in the Kavanaugh case, the powerholders in Congress are showing themselves as stubborn old farts from a time far, far away. Dragging this on only helps the Democrats in November. It also gives more time for the 93 percent of the background files on Kavanaugh to shake loose, which it seems obvious to me, is what the Repugs are scared stiff in having leaked.

The Dems have already filed on removing Kavanaugh on the basis of the shown lies in his congressional testimony, Holding on to him is only stupidity by the stubborn old fart Repugs in Congress. They should have let an investigation roll, which probably wouldn't have been conclusive and then either vote Kavanaugh in or let him loose and gone on to the next one, which would have helped bring Trump to heel in the process.
 
I asked you to not be a self-absorbed psycho ex girlfriend yet here we are.

If telling you I don't want you to discuss any aspect of my personal life on a public forum is being "self-absorbed" and "psycho," so be it.
 
Ask Feinstein who said she withheld the letter at Ford's request to keep her anonymous, to keep it secret...

;) ;)

Then someone mysteriously leaked it propelling this poor, poor hapless victim into the spotlight after the proceedings had concluded and the Democrats were about to lose a vote.
 
Just in this thread alone:

The men in this thread denouncing her are most definitely unaware of their own rapey tendencies.

You are obviously due for some introspection. I seriously doubt you are capable of that, even if you were clean and sober.

Absolutely. I can't even remember the last girl I was with that hadn't endured some form of sexual abuse besides my girlfriend.

Quelle surprise! The common denominator in that particular subset of women is you. I'm assuming that you don't even realize the unintentional irony here, since you failed to delineate a timeline for their abuse.

I see mAnn still hasn't learned what "consent" means. Imagine being a female in his life.

"Fenale?"

Men who respect women do not generally refer to them as females. Female is a gender, not a person.

You're a cool kid.

I bought one for my new salesgirl after her insistence (hey, she is a great salesperson!). She quit after 3 months and probably only used the damn thing twice. That Keurig now collects dust on my girlfriend's countertop.

"Salesgirl?" How progressive. Do you refer to your Male salespersons as "salesboys?"

I asked you to not be a self-absorbed psycho ex girlfriend yet here we are.

What a peach you are. Classic crazy-making abuser technique. It isn't you not respecting boundaries, the problem lies with them. Let me guess: every single woman you have ever been with turned out to be a psycho, amirite?

Probably they have all suffered a psychic break from being deprived of the wonder that is you?
 
Back
Top