Kreepy Kavanaugh

[Luk]

Give it a break. What teenage boy hasn’t tried to fondle, grope, or undress a girl during his high school years. If he had raped her that would be a totally different story.

Kill yourself.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Give it a break. What teenage boy hasn’t tried to fondle, grope, or undress a girl during his high school years. If he had raped her that would be a totally different story.

What teenage boy hadn’t tried to cover up the screams of a person he is trying to disrobe without their consent after pushing them into a room with another boy while turning up the music to also cover up her struggle? Perfectly normal behavior.

 

[von_Bismarck]

Give it a break. What teenage boy hasn’t tried to fondle, grope, or undress a girl during his high school years. If he had raped her that would be a totally different story.

Here's the test. If it happened to your daughter, would you react as nonchalantly? If you would, you're a monster. If you wouldn't, you're an asshole.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Here's the test. If it happened to your daughter, would you react as nonchalantly? If you would, you're a monster. If you wouldn't, you're an asshole.

Apparently, they’re unaware that attempted rape is indeed a crime.

 

[Luk]

I see mAnn still hasn't learned what "consent" means. Imagine being a female in his life.

Give it a break. What teenage boy hasn’t tried to fondle, grope, or undress a girl during his high school years. If he had raped her that would be a totally different story.

What teenage boy hadn’t tried to cover up the screams of a person he is trying to disrobe without their consent after pushing them into a room with another boy while turning up the music to also cover up her struggle? Perfectly normal behavior.

Here's the test. If it happened to your daughter, would you react as nonchalantly? If you would, you're a monster. If you wouldn't, you're an asshole.

Apparently, they’re unaware that attempted rape is indeed a crime.

Just another Kenneth alt.

 

[Rightguide]

Now, every single person she named at the party has denied any knowledge of any such incident. This woman is a neurotic mess who is being used as a useful tool by the Democrat Party. She's not going to testify, like Lucy, she's going to keep pulling the football away. The Senate should just ignore her and vote. Once she is no longer useful, she will be discarded and forgotten and her unbelievable claims will simply go away.

But the damage will be done. Democrats are already talking about impeaching him even if he is returned to the bench as an appeals court judge or if he is confirmed, if they take back the House. This is what the continuing Democrat war against the Constitution looks like. These people are domestic enemies. They take an oath to uphold the Constitution and then resort to criminal activity to see it is never upheld either by them or the SCOTUS. Their Stalinism is appalling.

 

[schism666]

But the damage will be done. Democrats are already talking about impeaching him even if he is returned to the bench as an appeals court judge or if he is confirmed, if they take back the House. This is what the continuing Democrat war against the Constitution looks like. These people are domestic enemies. They take an oath to uphold the Constitution and then resort to criminal activity to see it is never upheld either by them or the SCOTUS. Their Stalinism is appalling.

if it turns out that kavanaugh has lied under oath, do you believe he should be removed from his current position?

 

[Aglaopheme]

Of course not even holding a hearing for an appointee to kept a seat open that you may have a shot at is just fine.

 

[Adre]

Now, every single person she named at the party has denied any knowledge of any such incident. This woman is a neurotic mess who is being used as a useful tool by the Democrat Party. She's not going to testify, like Lucy, she's going to keep pulling the football away. The Senate should just ignore her and vote. Once she is no longer useful, she will be discarded and forgotten and her unbelievable claims will simply go away.

The upside to your scenario is that rightwing Republicans will be defeated in elections for years to come, as educated white women leave the Party forever. (Don’t expect to be hired as a political consultant any time soon.)

 

[Saint Peter]

if it turns out that kavanaugh has lied under oath, do you believe he should be removed from his current position?

Definitely.

 

[Rightguide]

Speaking of racists and immaturity, your BFF there that you quoted, he hasn't dropped the n-word or the c-word yet...he's usually a regular jumping bean on this site, all animated and excited like a latchkey kid who found his parents' meth stash. I know you guys are thick as thieves, so...is he all good?

Actually you know very little except your fanciful preconceived notions and the silly epiphanies you envision during those giggling ejaculations produced from what appears to be a vast library of goofy adolescent gifs.

 

[Que]

Of course not even holding a hearing for an appointee to kept a seat open that you may have a shot at is just fine.

Thanks, Joe Biden!

 

[Rightguide]

if it turns out that kavanaugh has lied under oath, do you believe he should be removed from his current position?

Which Democrat alleged he lied under oath?

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Which Democrat alleged he lied under oath?

Lahey and Durbin - He lied during his hearing to get on the DC Circuit

 

[schism666]

Which Democrat alleged he lied under oath?

it's a simple direct question. your unwillingness to be honest and truthful has been noted.

 

[KeithD]

But the damage will be done. Democrats are already talking about impeaching him even if he is returned to the bench as an appeals court judge or if he is confirmed, if they take back the House. This is what the continuing Democrat war against the Constitution looks like. These people are domestic enemies. They take an oath to uphold the Constitution and then resort to criminal activity to see it is never upheld either by them or the SCOTUS. Their Stalinism is appalling.

He has been shown to have lied under oath in testimony for the job he now has. Please explain how impeaching him for that is somehow unconstitutional.

 

[Rightguide]

Lahey and Durbin - He lied during his hearing to get on the DC Circuit

Actually neither have any credibility. What was the alleged lie?

 

[schism666]

if it turns out that kavanaugh has lied under oath, do you believe he should be removed from his current position?

it's a simple direct question. your unwillingness to be honest and truthful has been noted.

Actually neither have any credibility. What was the alleged lie?

 

[beew]

Give it a break. What teenage boy hasn’t tried to fondle, grope, or undress a girl during his high school years. If he had raped her that would be a totally different story.

That's a remote possibility too, you're right.
Although her -very credible- account was of a rape attempt. Not simply a misreading of signals, after which he stopped once she said "no".

A few of the #MeToo complaints were more likely to be in the latter category.
It's a pitty that they are now changing perceptions and planting doubts about potentially true victims of sexual assault.

 

[Rightguide]

He has been shown to have lied under oath in testimony for the job he now has. Please explain how impeaching him for that is somehow unconstitutional.

Shown where?

Because an accusation is not enough. There has to a full House investigation and a trial in the Senate to remove him from office.

As to the alleged lies, this from The Daily Caller and the WaPo, at the least a reasonable doubt:

"both Kavanaugh and The White House reject the allegations that he was untruthful during his appeals court confirmation hearings. “Brett Kavanaugh was not involved in meetings or drafting of legal memoranda related to the terrorist surveillance program,” The White House said in a statement, according to WaPo.

“Durbin’s statement that there’s new evidence that Kavanaugh misled the Judiciary Committee … is worth Two Pinocchios,” WaPo determined. (RELATED: Abortion Group: Kavanaugh Accuser Should ‘Never Have Had To Come Forward’)

WaPo also fact checked the claim that Kavanaugh was aware of and had a role in Bush’s NSA Terrorist Surveillance Program and determined the claim is false, giving it Three Pinocchios. Leahy is “throwing red meat out without much to back him up, and he gets Three Pinocchios for this one.”

https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/17/dems-kavanaugh-wapo-fact-check/

 

[von_Bismarck]

Thanks, Joe Biden!

That's a remote possibility too, you're right.
Although her -very credible- account was of a rape attempt. Not simply a misreading of signals, after which he stopped once she said "no".

A few of the #MeToo complaints were more likely to be in the latter category.
It's a pitty that they are now changing perceptions and planting doubts about potentially true victims of sexual assault.

Shaddup, Que.

 

[SpeareChucker]

Trying to find something to stick to the wall...

 

[Oblimo]

Well, no one is interested in making him criminally culpable.

It’s probably been said in this thread already, but I’m taking a break from reading RightGuide’s stupid ass posts: due process rights do not apply to the vetting for being appointed to the SCOTUS. There is no burden of proof other than whatever the sitting senators make up in their heads.

Something I learned today changes the calculus to my mind: apparently, there is no statute of limitations for sexual abuse of a minor in Maryland.

 

[von_Bismarck]

Trying to find something to stick to the wall...

Kill yourself.

Well said.

 

[SpeareChucker]

That's a remote possibility too, you're right.
Although her -very credible- account was of a rape attempt. Not simply a misreading of signals, after which he stopped once she said "no".

A few of the #MeToo complaints were more likely to be in the latter category.
It's a pitty that they are now changing perceptions and planting doubts about potentially true victims of sexual assault.

"What we have here, Senator Feinstein, is the #MeToo movement going into its Robespierre period, lopping off heads as it goes. Where this Reign of Terror will end, nobody knows, but Dianne Feinstein and this odd Dr. Ford (imagine being in therapy with her) have a lot to answer for.

"The endless tap dance about how and when Ford should testify -- and the absolutely astonishing demand that Kavanaugh should testify first, before his accuser, turning the rule of law on its head -- completes this picture of the #MeToo movement gone berserk. Genuine victims of abuse will, of course, suffer as people become increasingly fed up with this charade.

"Did Feinstein, Schumer et al. think of that in their zeal to get Kavanaugh? If he does go down, it will be a Pyrrhic victory anyway. There is little likelihood the Republicans will lose the Senate (even if they lose the House) and Trump will replace Brett with someone else -- most likely a woman like Amy Coney Barrett, who is younger than Kavanaugh and further to the right."
Roger L. Simon, PJ Media


https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/feinstein-and-ford-are-destroying-the-metoo-movement/