Kreepy Kavanaugh

[doowdniw]

He could. Let's back up to where this started, though. Let's not be moving the goal posts. The phrase you wrote that I called you on was "or at least not objecting to it." I asked for a citation that he was objecting to an investigation. I haven't seen a citation yet. Is he personally objecting to an investigation? Either no or yes. No need to move the goal posts on that question. I don't think he's objected to an investigation--because he doesn't have to at this point. There's no indication that he's being consulted on the question. Others are carrying the water bucket. Why wouldn't he let them?

You're also moving the goal posts on the "going after her" issue. You were talking about him suing her for libel. That's not the same thing in any sense as agreeing "with her on" having "an independent investigation." If he sued her for libel that absolutely would be "going after her."

Can't really discuss the issue if you keep changing the goal posts of what the discussion is.

You may have missed it when I said in response to your request for citation the following: He has not publicly objected. Now show me where I said anything about him suing her.

 

[doowdniw]

He's already endured six FBI background checks. The FBI has already declined to open another investigation.

They haven't been asked.

 

[Rightguide]

They haven't been asked.

Youu are uninformed:

https://www.dailywire.com/news/35848/breaking-fbi-isnt-investigating-brett-kavanaugh-ashe-schow

 

[Rightguide]

man you republicans own everything including the sc even if kavanaugh is denied so your way of life isnt threatened so quit your crying, lol

I hope you are falsely accused of a crime that wreck your future.

 

[doowdniw]

Youu are uninformed:

https://www.dailywire.com/news/35848/breaking-fbi-isnt-investigating-brett-kavanaugh-ashe-schow

Your cite does not say that they were asked to reopen the background investigation. Pretty sure that would have to come from the chair and ranking member to the President, who would make the request. Pretty sure with Mr. "Have a good time." in the oval office that won't happen.

 

[ChinoMoreno]

I hope you are falsely accused of a crime that wreck your future.

man im not a caucasian male so that is almost everyday, lol

 

[Rightguide]

Your cite does not say that they were asked to reopen the background investigation. Pretty sure that would have to come from the chair and ranking member to the President, who would make the request. Pretty sure with Mr. "Have a good time." in the oval office that won't happen.

Frankly, they have no jurisdiction in the matter as a criminal violation. They've already investigated his background six times. The statute of limitations has passed, so I'm sure the state of Maryland and the local jurisdiction will decline an investigation as well. A simple accusation without evidence is not probable cause to open an investigation.

 

[Rightguide]

man im not a caucasian male so that is almost everyday, lol

^^^

Racist bitch.

 

[BBX50]

The people here claiming Ford is a liar might want to explain her eagerness to have her claims investigated, even though lying to the FBI is a federal crime.

since the FBI said they wont investigate, her calling for it is BULL SHIT

 

[Aglaopheme]

Frankly, they have no jurisdiction in the matter as a criminal violation. They've already investigated his background six times. The statute of limitations has passed, so I'm sure the state of Maryland and the local jurisdiction will decline an investigation as well. A simple accusation without evidence is not probable cause to open an investigation.

There is no statute of limitations on felony sexual offenses in the State if Maryland. The FBI now has new information, and the only way for them to reopen a look at his background would be upon the request of the President. So, no they have not refused to investigate, as stated before, Trump has not asked they to investigate this new information.

 

[BBX50]

Blah Zee Ford EXPOSED


As

CuntCLinton!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/iL9AZmWW1J0_Q-KX4oOWPBLKd59dW7PXLMukHrDSGTUhCmFrIZlJNSfwyh0Vuno_-O8o7FY=s143

 

[BBX50]

Charles C. W. Cooke
✔
@charlescwcooke
Am I correct in saying that it is now the case that the only person who hasn’t given any form of under-oath statement (yes, letters to the Judiciary Committee count) is the accuser? https://twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1042645110259941376?s=21 …

 

[BBX50]

Democrats: Listen to this woman's story!
Republicans: Okay. When can she come by?
Democrats: Never.
Republicans: But how are we going to listen to her --
Democrats: WE SAID NEVER


https://twitter.com/ValerieJarrett/status/1042546280575258624 …


Lets assume the FBI did investigate and found nothing....cause BK swore under oath he doesnt even know the CUNT......the LIBZ will scream, Trump pressured the FBI to lie

 

[Rightguide]

There is no statute of limitations on felony sexual offenses in the State if Maryland. The FBI now has new information, and the only way for them to reopen a look at his background would be upon the request of the President. So, no they have not refused to investigate, as stated before, Trump has not asked they to investigate this new information.

She didn't allege a felony level of sexual assault. Show me where she did.

The FBI declined to investigate the issue:

https://www.dailywire.com/news/35848/breaking-fbi-isnt-investigating-brett-kavanaugh-ashe-schow

There is no new information. The letter Feinstein turned over to them is the only evidence and it is vague. Grassley can't even get a copy of the letter out of Feinstein. She needs to testify under oath on Monday or shut up.

 

[Rightguide]

Democrats: Listen to this woman's story!
Republicans: Okay. When can she come by?
Democrats: Never.
Republicans: But how are we going to listen to her --
Democrats: WE SAID NEVER


https://twitter.com/ValerieJarrett/status/1042546280575258624 …


Lets assume the FBI did investigate and found nothing....cause BK swore under oath he doesnt even know the CUNT......the LIBZ will scream, Trump pressured the FBI to lie

Democrats: She has a right to be believed, period. From now on the entire constitutional authority of the Senate Confirmation process can be undermined and halted with a single uncorroborated accusation.

 

[Aglaopheme]

We get it, kitten. You don’t think her allegations need to be investigated in anyway whatsoever. Nor do most of the Republicans on the committee. Nor does our darling President. We get it loud and clear.

 

[Aglaopheme]

It’s so much easier to try and discredit her with lie after lie that gets passed around by your ilk than actually have professionals question all of the folks involved. Again many taking that stance is clear as day.

 

[Rightguide]

We get it, kitten. You don’t think her allegations need to be investigated in anyway whatsoever. Nor do most of the Republicans on the committee. Nor does our darling President. We get it loud and clear.

That is a fucking lie. Why do you lie? You need more than a vague letter to wreck a person's life. I want her to get her ass in there and testify under oath if she wants to be respected and believed like everyone else in society would have to do to be believed or fairly judged.

 

[Aglaopheme]

That is a fucking lie. Why do you lie? You need more than a vague letter to wreck a person's life. I want her to get her ass in there and testify under oath if she wants to be respected and believed like everyone else in society would have to do to be believed or fairly judged.

Testifying without all of the witnesses involved also having to testify is not an investigation no matter how much you would like so make it do. An investigation should be done by the FBI, professional, not a committee of mostly men that want the result to be their guy gets seated.

 

[cowslinger64]

like everyone else in society would have to do to be believed or fairly judged.

Holding the president to that standard is different tho..huh?

 

[Rightguide]

Testifying without all of the witnesses involved also having to testify is not an investigation no matter how much you would like so make it do. An investigation should be done by the FBI, professional, not a committee of mostly men that want the result to be their guy gets seated.

Bullshit! She has to make a credible statement under oath, like she would have to do if she were talking to the police. For all we know Feinstein wrote the letter she refuses to give to Grassley.

 

[ChinoMoreno]

^^^

Racist bitch.

im racist because i get profiled? i understand now that you're a victim blamer. you're going on ignore until you learn some manners, lol

We get it, kitten. You don’t think her allegations need to be investigated in anyway whatsoever. Nor do most of the Republicans on the committee. Nor does our darling President. We get it loud and clear.

kittens are cute not racist putos, lol

 

[Rightguide]

im racist because i get profiled? i understand now that you're a victim blamer. you're going on ignore until you learn some manners, lol

Thank you, I appreciate that. You're such an illiterate bore.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Bullshit! She has to make a credible statement under oath, like she would have to do if she were talking to the police. For all we know Feinstein wrote the letter she refuses to give to Grassley.

Like the police who would question all of the witnesses.

Like when an investigation was done by the FBI when Anita Hill stepped forward. How is this case any different? We do have a precedence here. Kindly, answer that simple question.

How many lies have you and BB shared about her here already? Do you enjoy maligning her so much that she’s had to go in to hiding due to death threats? Do you see your part in making that happen when you choose to propagate said lies?

 

[Rightguide]

Testifying without all of the witnesses involved also having to testify is not an investigation no matter how much you would like so make it do. An investigation should be done by the FBI, professional, not a committee of mostly men that want the result to be their guy gets seated.

There are no other witnesses except the second man who denies it all.