Kreepy Kavanaugh

“She did not have any physical injuries that required a physical examination in the past.

During a fight, Ellison pulled on her legs and feet while she was lying on a bed, Monahan said.

Monahan has previously said there is a video of the 2016 incident, which she told CBS News was the only instance of physical violence during their relationship.

http://m.startribune.com/ellison-ex-girlfriend-posts-medical-record-alleging-abuse/493785421/

Am I going to call for his head on a platter for “pulling on her legs and feet”, no.

Feel free to look up what I said about Franken and then kindly stuff it.
 
They want Kavanaugh seated when the Court's term begins in October. That's why they're pretending there's a clock on this, as Senator Lindsey Graham pretty much admitted on Wednesday.

CHARLES P. PIERCE
SEP 19, 2018


https://www.esquire.com/news-politi...ans-brett-kavanaugh-he-said-she-said-hearing/

gsgs comment-

Another Republican "puppet show"

/end gsgs comment

Think they are a tad bit afraid?


https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/385/189/d82.jpg

I bought myself one of these. It made it’s debut at a candidate fundraiser last night. Thank you, fall temps.
 
This is sort of the flip side of what Rightguard is trying to do here. If Kavanaugh hasn't personally objected, it can't be assumed that he does object. What I've heard several times on CNN today is that he's in the White House doing murder boards on exactly that--testifying to the assault charge. It's sort of the same thing as claiming that any poster supports Ellison by not condemning Ellison on a thread about Kavanaugh.

Let's wait to say he objects to testifying when he actually does.

He has not publicly objected, but neither has he publicly called for an investigation of what would otherwise be a libelous claim if untrue, and which his accuser has asked to be investigated. I find that to be more than a little curious.
 
He has not publicly objected, but neither has he publicly called for an investigation of what would otherwise be a libelous claim if untrue, and which his accuser has asked to be investigated. I find that to be more than a little curious.

Not really. He wants to be confirmed as easily as possible and minimize the fallout. What would be the public's reaction if he went after Ford, no matter whether or not the incident happened? Consider reality.

Look, he lied to Congress on the testimony at the hearings for the job he has now and it can be found in the official documentation. That should be enough to ditch him, but obviously the Republicans in Congress aren't going to show any integrity on this. The Ford angle helps the Democrats in November, but that's going to be all the satisfaction anyone, including Ford, is going to get out of the sexual assault angle unless/until someone else comes forward in the next couple of days.
 
Not really. He wants to be confirmed as easily as possible and minimize the fallout. What would be the public's reaction if he went after Ford, no matter whether or not the incident happened? Consider reality.

Look, he lied to Congress on the testimony at the hearings for the job he has now and it can be found in the official documentation. That should be enough to ditch him, but obviously the Republicans in Congress aren't going to show any integrity on this. The Ford angle helps the Democrats in November, but that's going to be all the satisfaction anyone, including Ford, is going to get out of the sexual assault angle unless/until someone else comes forward in the next couple of days.

He could just agree with her to have an independent investigation. I don't think that would be considered by any reasonable person as going after her. I agree that the rank hypocrisy of Hatch and Gassley will be pointed out by Democrats between now and November 6th. I don't think either is up for reelection in the upcoming midterm, and don't appear to care.
 
Last edited:
He could just agree with her to have an independent investigation. I don't think that would be considered by any reasonable person as going after her. I agree that the rank hypocrisy of Hatch and Gassley will be pointed out by Democrats between now and November 6th. I don't think either is up for reelection in the upcoming midterm, and don't appear to care.

He could. Let's back up to where this started, though. Let's not be moving the goal posts. The phrase you wrote that I called you on was "or at least not objecting to it." I asked for a citation that he was objecting to an investigation. I haven't seen a citation yet. Is he personally objecting to an investigation? Either no or yes. No need to move the goal posts on that question. I don't think he's objected to an investigation--because he doesn't have to at this point. There's no indication that he's being consulted on the question. Others are carrying the water bucket. Why wouldn't he let them?

You're also moving the goal posts on the "going after her" issue. You were talking about him suing her for libel. That's not the same thing in any sense as agreeing "with her on" having "an independent investigation." If he sued her for libel that absolutely would be "going after her."

Can't really discuss the issue if you keep changing the goal posts of what the discussion is.
 
There are only three people and one deity who knows what really happened to Dr. Ford. They are the Dr . Herself, God, and Kavanaugh and his cohort Mark Judge. God isn't speaking and neither are Kavanaugh and Judge. Most comments made by males on the Internet all are defending Kavanaugh and jumping on Dr. Ford for lying. What these males conveniently forget is that most males, be they teenagers, young adults or older males tend to brag about their sexual conquest so it's no order that people who went to the same school as Dr. Ford would have heard about Kavanaugh's attempted rape.
 
Mark Judge bragged about it in a published book. He'd be the first one I'd force under oath to testify.
 
There are only three people and one deity who knows what really happened to Dr. Ford. They are the Dr . Herself, God, and Kavanaugh and his cohort Mark Judge. God isn't speaking and neither are Kavanaugh and Judge. Most comments made by males on the Internet all are defending Kavanaugh and jumping on Dr. Ford for lying. What these males conveniently forget is that most males, be they teenagers, young adults or older males tend to brag about their sexual conquest so it's no order that people who went to the same school as Dr. Ford would have heard about Kavanaugh's attempted rape.

this isnt true

you LIED
 
:cool:Committee Majority has yet to see original, unredacted letter from Dr. Blasey Ford to Sen. Feinstein.

WHY?

We know why!
 
Would you prefer he call her trailer trash, or blame a 'vast, left-wing conspiracy?"
You must be a huge Jeanine Pirro fan.

‘What was he supposed to do, take a gun out and shoot Putin?’ - Pirro's defense of Trump kowtowing to Putin in Helsinki.


The most recent demand, via her lawyer, is that the FBI thoroughly investigate the allegation or she won't testify. First of all the FBI has no authority to investigate.
:rolleyes:
The FBI performs background checks on people nominated to the supreme court, among many other appointees.

Cite the statute that says they have no authority to reopen a BC check when new information comes to light.
Throw in the fact that the only other named witness flatly states, "it never happened."
You mean the guy who says women should be slapped around, men should show women who's boss, he misses how Bush slapped Laura's ass in public to show who wears the pants in the family? That witness?
 
Last edited:
I think Kay Ivey summed up the republican position on such matters very well when she said
I believe in the Republican Party, what we stand for, and most important, we need to have a Republican in the United States Senate to vote on things like the Supreme Court justices, other appointments the Senate has to confirm and make major decisions. So that’s what I plan to do, vote for Republican nominee Roy Moore.
Even though in the same interview she said she has no reason to disbelieve the women who were accusing him of being a sexual predator.
Basically party before morals, or in the his case, the law.

Great way to start the term of a person who rules on the law.
 
I had no idea that there’s someone up for a lifetime appointment to the SCOTUS, named Ellison. What news source is everyone using?
 
He could just agree with her to have an independent investigation. I don't think that would be considered by any reasonable person as going after her. I agree that the rank hypocrisy of Hatch and Gassley will be pointed out by Democrats between now and November 6th. I don't think either is up for reelection in the upcoming midterm, and don't appear to care.




The people here claiming Ford is a liar might want to explain her eagerness to have her claims investigated, even though lying to the FBI is a federal crime.
 
The irony of a thread titled "Kreepy Kavanaugh" on THIS site isn't lost on me. This bullshit accusation against Judge Kavanaugh is simply un fair and should not have even been considered. In fact, up until recently when we all became assholes, it wouldn't have been considered. I was listening tho NPR and hey said they didn't want this to devolve into a "he said/she said" situation. How in God's name could it possibly be anything else? This allegation is 36 yrs old with LESS THAN ZERO evidence that anything happened. Dismissed. This is strictly driven by the media-political complex. As a citizen, I demand an immediate vote on Judge Kavanaugh's nomination to the Supreme Court. He has met every standard and should be seated immediately. For those who don't like him for whatever reason, fine. Go back and vote for an administration that would npminate a Justice more in line with your thinking.
 
He could just agree with her to have an independent investigation. I don't think that would be considered by any reasonable person as going after her. I agree that the rank hypocrisy of Hatch and Gassley will be pointed out by Democrats between now and November 6th. I don't think either is up for reelection in the upcoming midterm, and don't appear to care.

Look, let's stop treating her like child. She made a big girl criminal accusation against one of the nation's most respected jurists. She doesn't get to put conditions on the committee process, make demands for treatment nobody else would get if they walked into a police station and made a criminal complaint.

Feminists tell us how women only want to be treated equally, how mature and strong they are, yet, every time something like this happens the left wants to Infantilize the female and lecture us about her feelings, emotions, trauma, etc, and treat her like she's still an adolescent. Give her 24 hours to get her ass in front of investigators under oath and testify, or shut the fuck up and let the hearings continue.
 
The irony of a thread titled "Kreepy Kavanaugh" on THIS site isn't lost on me. This bullshit accusation against Judge Kavanaugh is simply un fair and should not have even been considered. In fact, up until recently when we all became assholes, it wouldn't have been considered. I was listening tho NPR and hey said they didn't want this to devolve into a "he said/she said" situation. How in God's name could it possibly be anything else? This allegation is 36 yrs old with LESS THAN ZERO evidence that anything happened. Dismissed. This is strictly driven by the media-political complex. As a citizen, I demand an immediate vote on Judge Kavanaugh's nomination to the Supreme Court. He has met every standard and should be seated immediately. For those who don't like him for whatever reason, fine. Go back and vote for an administration that would npminate a Justice more in line with your thinking.

man we are way beyond that part of the conversation catch up, lol ;)

Look, let's stop treating her like child. She made a big girl criminal accusation against one of the nation's most respected jurists. She doesn't get to put conditions on the committee process, make demands for treatment nobody else would get if they walked into a police station and made a criminal complaint.

Feminists tell us how women only want to be treated equally, how mature and strong they are, yet, every time something like this happens the left wants to Infantilize the female and lecture us about her feelings, emotions, trauma, etc, and treat her like she's still an adolescent. Give her 24 hours to get her ass in front of investigators under oath and testify, or shut the fuck up and let the hearings continue.

man kavanaugh is a big boy and he should be able to put on his big boy pants and be vetted to the highest extent since he will preside over the highest court in the land. women will never be treated equally of we let rapists preside over our courts, lol ;)
 
The irony of a thread titled "Kreepy Kavanaugh" on THIS site isn't lost on me. This bullshit accusation against Judge Kavanaugh is simply un fair and should not have even been considered. In fact, up until recently when we all became assholes, it wouldn't have been considered. I was listening tho NPR and hey said they didn't want this to devolve into a "he said/she said" situation. How in God's name could it possibly be anything else? This allegation is 36 yrs old with LESS THAN ZERO evidence that anything happened. Dismissed. This is strictly driven by the media-political complex. As a citizen, I demand an immediate vote on Judge Kavanaugh's nomination to the Supreme Court. He has met every standard and should be seated immediately. For those who don't like him for whatever reason, fine. Go back and vote for an administration that would npminate a Justice more in line with your thinking.


The Democrat plan is to destroy or halt Republican efforts to put "any" conservative on the SCOTUS. They all must be demonized and destroyed. Senator "bitch" Gillibrand said as much. This means of course that she doesn't want the Constitution she took an oath to uphold, upheld.
 
man we are way beyond that part of the conversation catch up, lol ;)



man kavanaugh is a big boy and he should be able to put on his big boy pants and be vetted to the highest extent since he will preside over the highest court in the land. women will never be treated equally of we let rapists preside over our courts, lol ;)

He's already endured six FBI background checks. The FBI has already declined to open another investigation.
 
The Democrat plan is to destroy or halt Republican efforts to put "any" conservative on the SCOTUS. They all must be demonized and destroyed. Senator "bitch" Gillibrand said as much. This means of course that she doesn't want the Constitution she took an oath to uphold, upheld.

man you republicans own everything including the sc even if kavanaugh is denied so your way of life isnt threatened so quit your crying, lol;)
 
Back
Top