Kreepy Kavanaugh

[beew]

TWO of the so called witnesses your CUNT named.....said ITS NOT TRUE

Yes BB.

It's quite possible that they are telling the truth, and the incident didn't happen.

But you also have to consider the possibility of them lying to cover their own backs:
If the event did happen, and they witnessed it, how do you think it reflects on their character, that they didn't come forward at the time?

So it's not a slam dunk and they need to investigate more.


ETA
Also this:

And we can speculate on why the other witness is so determined to not say anything under oath./QUOTE]

 

[BBX50]

covering what?

 

[RobDownSouth]

It's simply a personal opinion so please fuck off.

I've got both Rob and you yapping at my heels.
Why does it have to always be "either you're 100% with us, or against us" with you clowns?
This Left versus Right political paradigm moronized half of America.

Perhaps you shouldn't have used the word "psychopath" to describe the victim (yes, yes, we know, you "really meant" to use that term to describe Rapist Kavanaugh)

Poor victim-y octothorp.

 

[BBX50]

In College Column, Cory Booker Revealed Time He Groped Friend, And She Resisted
https://dailycaller.com/2013/08/11/i...-she-resisted/

its OK

he is

BLACK and a DUMOH

 

[beew]

Perhaps you shouldn't have used the word "psychopath" to describe the victim (yes, yes, we know, you "really meant" to use that term to describe Rapist Kavanaugh)

Poor victim-y octothorp.

I wasn't referring to her.
Regardless of how I might have phrased it, I'm not responsible for your inability or unwillingness to suss out what the other person meant, StainMan.

Yes, it's all murky, but I get the Public's worries and anxieties.
What she describes are signs of psychopathy, not a one off terrible behavior that never reccurs.
If true, I would be anxious to see someone like that being given so much power.

 

[Rightguide]

No, silly. You are referring to a letter sent in support of Dr Ford which has now reached over 600 signatures.

No clown, I'm referring to this:

http://confirmkavanaugh.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Women-from-Bush-White-House.pdf

http://confirmkavanaugh.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Women-Law-Clerks-Letter.pdf

http://confirmkavanaugh.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Law-Students-Letter-Men-and-Women.pdf

 

[Rightguide]

Perhaps you shouldn't have used the word "psychopath" to describe the victim (yes, yes, we know, you "really meant" to use that term to describe Rapist Kavanaugh)

Poor victim-y octothorp.

There's no evidence that she is a victim except for her own assertion.

 

[Rightguide]

Another alleged party attendee named Patrick Smythe denies being at the a party. Another drive by shooting of a SCOTUS nominee.

 

[Aglaopheme]

No clown, I'm referring to this:

http://confirmkavanaugh.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Women-from-Bush-White-House.pdf

http://confirmkavanaugh.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Women-Law-Clerks-Letter.pdf

http://confirmkavanaugh.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Law-Students-Letter-Men-and-Women.pdf

Those mother add up to over 200, nor were they published after these allegations came to light.

Do you think Renee Burbank still wants her name on that letter? I think not. Maybe that is why one cannot simply access these old letter on Kavanaugh’s site. Nice try, kitten.

 

[BBX50]

Those mother add up to over 200, nor were they published after these allegations came to light.

Do you think Renee Burbank still wants her name on that letter? I think not. Maybe that is why one cannot simply access these old letter on Kavanaugh’s site. Nice try, kitten.

https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/19/...ush&utm_source=daily_caller&utm_campaign=push


‘EMOTIONAL AND PHYSICAL ABUSE’: ELLISON ACCUSER POSTS DOCTOR’S REPORT NAMING CONGRESSMAN AS ALLEGED ABUSER



Comment...ALGO?

 

[KeithD]

What matters is what someone will say under oath to the FBI or in a congressional hearing. That Mark Judge, for instance, will say he doesn't recall anything like this incident but resists saying that under oath in a congressional hearing is evidence itself that they need a congressional hearing with witnesses under oath. In the only precedence to this, the Anita Hill case, there was both an FBI investigation and testimony under oath--and it was done as a reopening of the hearings. Why would there be anything less here?

That said, having a thread on a porn board where those who are arguing from a biased perception to begin with is pretty much a time waster. Most of the attention I have to devote to this issue is taken up with what is actually happening in the news.

Whatever else happens, the Democrats have already won by sending this process into disarray and storing up fodder to use in the November congressional campaign with a segment of women voters who have become all the more powerful since the Clarence Thomas hearings and haven't stopped festering their resentments since then. What the Democrats may ultimately lose in the Kavanaugh vote, they might gain in seats in Congress and, in any event, doesn't burnish the Republicans' image in the least.

 

[BBX50]

What matters is what someone will say under oath to the FBI or in a congressional hearing. That Mark Judge, for instance, will say he doesn't recall anything like this incident but resists saying that under oath in a congressional hearing is evidence itself that they need a congressional hearing with witnesses under oath. In the only precedence to this, the Anita Hill case, there was both an FBI investigation and testimony under oath--and it was done as a reopening of the hearings. Why would there be anything less here?

That said, having a thread on a porn board where those who are arguing from a biased perception to begin with is pretty much a time waster. Most of the attention I have to devote to this issue is taken up with what is actually happening in the news.

Whatever else happens, the Democrats have already won by sending this process into disarray and storing up fodder to use in the November congressional campaign with a segment of women voters who have become all the more powerful since the Clarence Thomas hearings and haven't stopped festering their resentments since then. What the Democrats may ultimately lose in the Kavanaugh vote, they might gain in seats in Congress and, in any event, doesn't burnish the Republicans' image in the least.

Lying CUNT not showing up says more

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Repubs want a rapist to repeal Roe v. Wade. You can't get an abortion even in cases of rape, of course.

 

[phrodeau]

I wonder how Clarence Thomas thinks about his role in history now.

 

[doowdniw]

There's no evidence that she is a victim except for her own assertion.

There's no limit to what you cannot find if you don't actually look for it.

 

[KeithD]

Lying CUNT not showing up says more

So far she's been worth about a million votes to the Democrats in the November elections. I can see why that has you going rabid on this.

 

[Rightguide]

There's no limit to what you cannot find if you don't actually look for it.

What evidence did you find? Even an accusation requires some kind of corroboration to show probable cause in order to initiate an investigation, if a fundamental presumption of innocence is to be assumed.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Dear gotsnowgotslush,

You've made many a posts and threads during your tenure here at Lit, but this one is your best thirst trap ever. All the deplorable schmucks came to this party to flaccidly yap and yowl against the Cheeto-driven shit they can't stand to bear witness to...and they can't ever leave!

Kudos!

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxpj6grFIe1qcaomb.gif

 

[KeithD]

I wonder how Clarence Thomas thinks about his role in history now.

I'm sure he's quite unhappy about this being dredged up again. On the other hand, the Democrats running for a congressional seat all across the country are certainly pleased. Win or lose on the Kavanaugh appointment, the Democrats have won.

 

[Rightguide]

https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/19/...ush&utm_source=daily_caller&utm_campaign=push


‘EMOTIONAL AND PHYSICAL ABUSE’: ELLISON ACCUSER POSTS DOCTOR’S REPORT NAMING CONGRESSMAN AS ALLEGED ABUSER



Comment...ALGO?

ALGO approves of Democrat reprobates.

 

[Wok]

 

[KeithD]

ALGO approves of Democrat reprobates.

I don't remember the play here on Ellison. Could you cite where/when posters to the board have posted/are showing support for Ellison?

It may be there, but I ask, because, you know, you don't exhibit having any more regard for the truth than Donald Trump does.

 

[trysail]

​

 

[IrezumiKiss]

bwahahahaha

Trysail's a laugh riot when he shifts into cunty catty bitch mode.

https://i.imgur.com/WEsKjz4.gif?1

 

[BBX50]

I don't remember the play here on Ellison. Could you cite where/when posters to the board have posted/are showing support for Ellison?

It may be there, but I ask, because, you know, you don't exhibit having any more regard for the truth than Donald Trump does.

no one started a thread calling for his ouster....but me

when I bring him up, your side is silent

no DUMZ have called for him to drop out

SILENCE=AGREE WITH A

BLACK

MUSLIM

DUMOH

Female beatings