Kreepy Kavanaugh

[Rightguide]

Dr. Ford's lawyers, Debra Katz and Lisa Banks, said in the letter that an FBI investigation should be the “first step” before a hearing, but did not indicate if she would appear before the committee if the FBI declines.

Dr. Ford and her family have had to relocate from their home and she has received death threats, had her email hacked, and been impersonated online.

Dr. Ford is willing to talk to committee leadership to sort out how she can cooperate while maintaining her own security.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, released a statement Tuesday night backing Ford.

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/articl...ord-wants-fbi-investigation-testifying-senate

He's already endured six FBI background checks. If she doesn't show up, hold the vote.

 

[RobDownSouth]

That's nor what I meant, that's what you wish I meant, StainMAnn..

This...

"What she describes are signs of psychopathy"

sure seems like one of your famous mental health misdiagnoses, no matter what you "meant" to say, Dr. Aspberger.

 

[Rightguide]

That's nor what I meant, that's what you wish I meant, StainMAnn..

Allegations made 30 years after the fact are always difficult to prove or disprove.
But they should be given the highest importance and thoroughly investigated. Especially when stakes are so high.

She never stepped up at any point in his career until now, and with zero evidence other than an accusation. She didn't say a word when he was appointed to the the DC Circuit Court "second highest court in the land." This is a political hit job, the sliming of a good man by the radical left.

 

[phrodeau]

He's already endured six FBI background checks. If she doesn't show up, hold the vote.

Those were when James Comey was in charge, so worthless.

 

[Wrong Element]

Actually as more and more of her background come out she isn't the model of stability that her supporters are trying to paint. More and more inconsistencies are appearing in her version of events. That is NOT to say she doesn't believe what she's saying. It is to say that the human memory is not perfect and she has NO corroborating evidence, none.

Forget about her, her allegations are meaningless after all this time if, in fact, there is any basis for them at all. This is raw, and dirty, politics playing out for all to see. A stalling tactic being used by the democrats to delay the confirmation vote until after the elections. If they achieve that goal, unlikely, Ms Ford will be thrown into the trash heap of history. If they don't achieve that goal, most probable, Ms Ford will be used as an election poster child until after the elections at which time she will once again find herself in the trash pile.

The most recent demand, via her lawyer, is that the FBI thoroughly investigate the allegation or she won't testify. First of all the FBI has no authority to investigate. No federal crime has been alleged to have been committed. If it's going to be investigated it would have to be by the DC police force or that of whichever MD force may have jurisdiction. The statute of limitations in the state of MD is 1 year for alleged assault charges, 35+ years stale now. So exactly what official investigative body is going to undertake that task? The short answer is none. No one is going to waste their time on her allegations. Throw in the fact that the only other named witness flatly states, "it never happened." But it makes for a great talking point for anyone who is driven by emotion over reason.

If she won't testify, schedule the vote.

The FBI background investigation that looked into Anita Hill's accusations took all of three days.

And we can speculate on why the other witness is so determined to not say anything under oath.

 

[ChinoMoreno]

https://i.imgur.com/5heRz0W.jpg

lol,

 

[beew]

This...

sure seems like one of your famous mental health misdiagnoses, no matter what you "meant" to say, Dr. Aspberger.

If she is telling the truth (my subjective hunch is that she is):

Do you think that a man who tried to force himself on a woman against her will -even once- is just your normal average Joe?
Maybe in your world.

But most people would disagree with you.
You don't need to read pop psychology to figure that out , you moron.

 

[Rightguide]

lol,

Cosby a sexual predator had a history of such behavior, there was no statute of limitations.

 

[RobDownSouth]

The FBI background investigation that looked into Anita Hill's accusations took all of three days.

And we can speculate on why the other witness is so determined to not say anything under oath.

The other witness, right wing mouthpiece Mike Judge, has written extensively (two books) over a decade ago about his prep school hijinks. I'm sure there's a lot of his writings that he would prefer to NOT enter into the discussion.

 

[ChinoMoreno]

Cosby a sexual predator had a history of such behavior, there was no statute of limitations.

man it all started a single accusation or are you partisan to concede that fact? lol,

and how does one "cosby a sexual predator"? punctuation is important, lol

 

[Wrong Element]

The other witness, right wing mouthpiece Mike Judge, has written extensively (two books) over a decade ago about his prep school hijinks. I'm sure there's a lot of his writings that he would prefer to NOT enter into the discussion.

Also, contrary to what Ish said, Judge isn't saying it never happened. He's saying he doesn't recall any such incident, and considering he spent his teenage years living out Less Than Zero in real life, I imagine there's a lot he doesn't recall about the early '80s.

 

[RobDownSouth]

If she is telling the truth (my subjective hunch is that she is):

Do you think that a man who tried to force himself on a woman against her will -even once- is just your normal average Joe?
Maybe in your world.

But most people would disagree with you.
You don't need to read pop psychology to figure that out , you moron.

Oh I see what you did there....since I called you out, you're now spinning your diagnosis to claim that KAVANAUGH is now a "psychopath", not Dr. Ford.

Gotcha.

We can chalk this up this misunderstanding to "English not being your first language", m'kay? *wink *wink

I don't think all rape-y high schoolers are psychopaths, btw.

And please stop ascribing positions to me. That's another "tell" of the Queerbait octothorp alt brigade.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Also, contrary to what Ish said, Judge isn't saying it never happened. He's saying he doesn't recall any such incident, and considering he spent his teenage years living out Less Than Zero in real life, I imagine there's a lot he doesn't recall about the early '80s.

Judge's statement was a masterful piece of wordsmithing..."I don't recall" "to my best recollection" etc.

It'd be interesting to put Kavanaugh's rapebuddy under oath.

 

[Rightguide]

man it all started a single accusation or are you partisan to concede that fact? lol,

and how does one "cosby a sexual predator"? punctuation is important, lol

After a parade of witnesses alleging the same in other cases.

That letter signed by 65 women backing Kavanaugh has now grown to over 200 who have known him, all expressing doubt in the accusations, and attesting to his character. The exact opposite of what happened in Cosby's case. Kavanaugh, the accused, is entitled to the presumption of innocence, which you fucks never heard of until it happens to you.

 

[Wrong Element]

Cosby a sexual predator had a history of such behavior, there was no statute of limitations.

It wasn't widely known that he "had a history of such behavior" until 1) women began publicly mentioning their encounters with him, many of them in the distant past; and 2) authorities and the media began looking into the allegations in a genuine search for the truth without an artificial deadline.

 

[trysail]

Time to put up or shut up:

"...the Senate Judiciary Committee is offering Ford the opportunity to testify in either an open public session or behind closed doors about her allegation that Kavanaugh assaulted her at a high school party more than 30 years ago.

"She could do it privately if she prefers, or publicly if she prefers," McConnell said, adding, "Monday is her opportunity." "​

​

 

[beew]

She never stepped up at any point in his career until now, and with zero evidence other than an accusation. She didn't say a word when he was appointed to the the DC Circuit Court "second highest court in the land." This is a political hit job, the sliming of a good man by the radical left.

Yes, I'm fully with you and bellisarius about those Democrats who are trying to use her for Politics, only to toss her aside when she's no longer needed.
That part is yucky.

But my hunch is that she's telling the truth.

It just doesn't make sense.
Why would she put herself in such a risky position by fabricating things? She's savy enough to know the risks. So I don't think that she's deliberately lying.
A more likely possibility (which belisarious brought up) is that she really believed that it happened, but that she's distorting reality. But even that seems weird.

And who knows what triggered her or worried her , for her to come forward at This point in time and not another ....


But these things are so hard to prove or disprove.

 

[ChinoMoreno]

After a parade of witnesses alleging the same in other cases.

That letter signed by 65 women backing Kavanaugh has now grown to over 200 who have known him, all expressing doubt in the accusations, and attesting to his character. The exact opposite of what happened in Cosby's case. Kavanaugh, the accused, is entitled to the presumption of innocence, which you fucks never heard of until it happens to you.

man are you aware WHEN those 65 names came to light? dude had those signatures at the ready, kinda strange, yes? lol,

Time to put up or shut up:

man youve said that dumb shit like 5 times get a new act, lol

"...the Senate Judiciary Committee is offering Ford the opportunity to testify in either an open public session or behind closed doors about her allegation that Kavanaugh assaulted her at a high school party more than 30 years ago.

"She could do it privately if she prefers, or publicly if she prefers," McConnell said, adding, "Monday is her opportunity." "​

​

 

[Rightguide]

Yes, I'm fully with you and bellisarius about those Democrats who are trying to use her for Politics, only to toss her aside when she's no longer needed.
That part is yucky.

But my hunch is that she's telling the truth.

It just doesn't make sense.
Why would she put herself in such a risky position by fabricating things? She's savy enough to know the risks. So I don't think that she's deliberately lying.
A more likely possibility (which belisarious brought up) is that she really believed that it happened, but that she's distorting reality. But even that seems weird.

And who knows what triggered her or worried her , for her to come forward at This point in time and not another ....


But these things are so hard to prove or disprove.

There is a reason we have statutes of limitations. Why did Feinstein not mention the letter which she knew about in July. Why did she wait until the last few days before the vote to bring it up? We know why.

She admitted to having been drinking. She couldn't remember the place or time the incident took place. In her initial conversation with the therapist she didn't mention a name, she said four boys were involved, then two and the second boy says it didn't happen. She said she didn't want to go public, but arranged for a private lie detector test and hired a well known left wing radical lawyer funded by George Soros. She herself is a radical left wing anti-Trumper. We've seen this picture before, we saw it with Bork and again with Justice Thomas.

 

[ChinoMoreno]

There is a reason we have statutes of limitations. Why did Feinstein not mention the letter which she knew about in July. Why did she wait until the last few days before the vote to bring it up? We know why.

She admitted to having been drinking. She couldn't remember the place or time the incident took place. In her initial conversation with the therapist she didn't mention a name, she said four boys were involved, then two and the second boy says it didn't happen. She said she didn't want to go public, but arranged for a private lie detector test and hired a well known left wing radical lawyer funded by George Soros. She herself is a radical left wing anti-Trumper. We've seen this picture before, we saw it with Bork and again with Justice Thomas.

https://i.imgur.com/5q76kpZ.png

lol,

 

[Ramone45]

Yes, I'm fully with you and bellisarius about those Democrats who are trying to use her for Politics, only to toss her aside when she's no longer needed.
That part is yucky.

But my hunch is that she's telling the truth.

It just doesn't make sense.
Why would she put herself in such a risky position by fabricating things? She's savy enough to know the risks. So I don't think that she's deliberately lying.
A more likely possibility (which belisarious brought up) is that she really believed that it happened, but that she's distorting reality. But even that seems weird.

And who knows what triggered her or worried her , for her to come forward at This point in time and not another ....


But these things are so hard to prove or disprove.

Thank God our system doesn't rely on your for shit hunch, right?

 

[beew]

Thank God our system doesn't rely on your for shit hunch, right?

It's simply a personal opinion so please fuck off.

I've got both Rob and you yapping at my heels.
Why does it have to always be "either you're 100% with us, or against us" with you clowns?
This Left versus Right political paradigm moronized half of America.

 

[Aglaopheme]

After a parade of witnesses alleging the same in other cases.

That letter signed by 65 women backing Kavanaugh has now grown to over 200 who have known him, all expressing doubt in the accusations, and attesting to his character. The exact opposite of what happened in Cosby's case. Kavanaugh, the accused, is entitled to the presumption of innocence, which you fucks never heard of until it happens to you.

No, silly. You are referring to a letter sent in support of Dr Ford which has now reached over 600 signatures.

As for Kavanaugh’s supporters:

Until this weekend, I told ppl that even if I disagreed with Kavanaugh, I thought he was a good man. That *should* be part of the analysis. I am gutted that may not be true — heartbroken for Ms. Ford, & mad that politics & ambition will probably trump doing the right thing

Renée Burbank
@ReneeABurbank
Also, fuck you Judiciary Cmtee Republicans for weaponizing statements, which largely were NOT made as a defense against these allegations, to imply that these people don’t believe her. Just because people in good faith said nice things doesn’t mean they don’t #believewomen

Two Yale professors who were featured in the university’s press release on Kavanaugh’s nomination wanted to make clear that they were not endorsing him. Indeed, at the bottom of the fawning press release, there was a disclaimer that it was not an endorsement. But it sounded like one.

Yale Law Professor William Eskridge said his comments were only about Kavanaugh’s “excellence as a legal intellect and thinker,” and Professor Abbe Gluck said that her “personal views about Judge Kavanaugh were separate from [her] views regarding confirmation on the merits, and that those depended on a full and thorough hearing of the Judge’s record.” She added that she believes the allegations require a full airing before any vote should occur.

“I signed the initial letter from Harvard Law alums based on what I knew of Judge Kavanaugh’s character at the time of the request,” said Elizabeth Knox, Harvard Law School ’16. “I could not support any nominee who acted in the ways described in this allegation. I would urge the Senate to refrain from holding a confirmation vote until more information is known.”

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/brett-kavanaugh-supporters_us_5ba12864e4b04d32ebfd446d

 

[BBX50]

Another Alleged Witness Denies Seeing or Hearing What Kavanaugh’s Accuser Claimed

so far the 2 the LIAR named have said its BS

 

[BBX50]

Yes, I'm fully with you and bellisarius about those Democrats who are trying to use her for Politics, only to toss her aside when she's no longer needed.
That part is yucky.

But my hunch is that she's telling the truth.

It just doesn't make sense.
Why would she put herself in such a risky position by fabricating things? She's savy enough to know the risks. So I don't think that she's deliberately lying.
A more likely possibility (which belisarious brought up) is that she really believed that it happened, but that she's distorting reality. But even that seems weird.

And who knows what triggered her or worried her , for her to come forward at This point in time and not another ....


But these things are so hard to prove or disprove.

TWO of the so called witnesses your CUNT named.....said ITS NOT TRUE