Trump: I would ‘personally prefer’ a government shutdown before the midterms

[FakeNews]

Thursday at a rally in Wilkes-Barre, PA, President Donald Trump said he would “personally prefer” to shut down the government before the midterm elections in November if Congress does not pass funding for a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border.

https://www.breitbart.com/video/201...er-a-government-shutdown-before-the-midterms/

 

[SpeareChucker]

Back to Breitbart...

 

[about_average]

Of course he would.
It would pretty much guarantee republicans would loose control of congress and then he could say, "See? I Told you the Russians were going to hack the election so the Democrats win!"

 

[SpeareChucker]

Won or would win?


When is he going to start telling us?

 

[about_average]

Won or would win?


When is he going to start telling us?

If you kept up with current events you'd know he's already said the Russians are going to hack the election to help democrats.

 

[SpeareChucker]

Another rally moment?

I know, to borrow from an earlier set of posts, you, like the press, take him literally, but not seriously...
I haven't seen anything in the way of official comments from him. Link?

 

[about_average]

Trump's official news source reported it, I'm surprised you missed it.

But here's the official official source:

Donald J. Trump
‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump

I’m very concerned that Russia will be fighting very hard to have an impact on the upcoming Election. Based on the fact that no President has been tougher on Russia than me, they will be pushing very hard for the Democrats. They definitely don’t want Trump!
8:50 AM - 24 Jul 2018 - https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump​

Since Trump's intelligence agencies say:
1. The Russian's hacked election systems in 2016
2. They are still attacking the US
3. They are getting better
and Trump says he believes his intelligence agencies, there's only one conclusion to draw from his tweet.

This is the last time I'm doing your homework. If you're not able to do it, that's your problem. I'm not going to cover for you anymore. At least pay attention in class.

 

[about_average]

I know, to borrow from an earlier set of posts, you, like the press, take him literally, but not seriously...

Ohh, cool. It was shown you were full of shit when you accused me of lying about ID's, so now it's, "He said it, but he was joking."

LMAO, you're getting up there to the level of RightGuide with your unintentional humor.

 

[KeithD]

Another rally moment?

I know, to borrow from an earlier set of posts, you, like the press, take him literally, but not seriously...
I haven't seen anything in the way of official comments from him. Link?

Trump's lying and lowest-common-denominator campaign is working a charm with you, I can see.

We are supposed to be able to take our president literally. And whatever the president of the United States says or writes in public is an official comment. It was a basic axiom, with any breaches setting off alarm bells, before The Donald came along and started picking off the lowest-hanging fruit, like you.

Why have you felt the need to go to yet another alt? You realize you are wearing them out with nonsense too quickly?

 

[someoneyouknow]

If you kept up with current events you'd know he's already said the Russians are going to hack the election to help democrats.

But of course they didn't hack the 2016 election to help him. Nope, all fake.

 

[bellisarius]

Trump's official news source reported it, I'm surprised you missed it.

But here's the official official source:

Donald J. Trump
‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump

I’m very concerned that Russia will be fighting very hard to have an impact on the upcoming Election. Based on the fact that no President has been tougher on Russia than me, they will be pushing very hard for the Democrats. They definitely don’t want Trump!
8:50 AM - 24 Jul 2018 - https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump​

Since Trump's intelligence agencies say:
1. The Russian's hacked election systems in 2016
2. They are still attacking the US
3. They are getting better
and Trump says he believes his intelligence agencies, there's only one conclusion to draw from his tweet.

This is the last time I'm doing your homework. If you're not able to do it, that's your problem. I'm not going to cover for you anymore. At least pay attention in class.

No election was "hacked." No ballots or voting systems were penetrated by the Russians or anyone else.

Stirring shit up on social media is NOT hacking, hell, it's not even against the law.

 

[about_average]

No election was "hacked." No ballots or voting systems were penetrated by the Russians or anyone else.

Who said they hacked voting systems?

 

[bellisarius]

Who said they hacked voting systems?

Obviously you line item-ed the intelligence agencies as saying the election was "hacked."

 

[Aglaopheme]

https://slate.com/technology/2018/0...it-could-be-even-more-damaging-next-time.html

 

[about_average]

Obviously you line item-ed the intelligence agencies as saying the election was "hacked."

It would seem reading isn't one of your strong points.

Since Trump's intelligence agencies say:
1. The Russian's hacked election systems in 2016
2. They are still attacking the US
3. They are getting better
and Trump says he believes his intelligence agencies, there's only one conclusion to draw from his tweet.

Or are you just lying hoping no one would notice?

 

[run_silent]

Back to Breitbart...

They have as much credibility as MSNBC. I ignore them both.

 

[bellisarius]

It would seem reading isn't one of your strong points.
Or are you just lying hoping no one would notice?

Voting systems.

None of those systems were involved in vote counting, however.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

No election was "hacked." No ballots or voting systems were penetrated by the Russians or anyone else.

Stirring shit up on social media is NOT hacking, hell, it's not even against the law.

President explicitly says otherwise.

https://media.tenor.co/images/c599845f5509d6f9412bf92dc8170ba7/tenor.gif

 

[RobDownSouth]

Who said they hacked voting systems?

That was just NotIshmael movin' the goalposts again.
Third time today he's done that.

 

[about_average]

Voting systems.

You must have gotten D's in school for reading comprehension.

Since Trump's intelligence agencies say:
1. The Russian's hacked election systems in 2016
2. They are still attacking the US
3. They are getting better
and Trump says he believes his intelligence agencies, there's only one conclusion to draw from his tweet.

And if you ever figure out that I didn't say what you're claiming I said, and grasp what I actually said, you might realize that if they get in to the voter registration databases and delete registered voters so they can't vote, that will affect the vote count.

I hope you're just pretending to be as stupid as you appear.

 

[Saint_Ann]

You must have gotten D's in school for reading comprehension.

And if you ever figure out that I didn't say what you're claiming I said, and grasp what I actually said, you might realize that if they get in to the voter registration databases and delete registered voters so they can't vote, that will affect the vote count.

I hope you're just pretending to be as stupid as you appear.

Let's pretend Hillary won. Would the hacking be a huge deal or not?

 

[Luk]

No election was "hacked." No ballots or voting systems were penetrated by the Russians or anyone else.

Stirring shit up on social media is NOT hacking, hell, it's not even against the law.

The Russians hacked social media accounts and sent bots to do their dirty work. You've admitted several times that you know nothing about social media so it's best that you just be hushed about such things.

 

[bellisarius]

You must have gotten D's in school for reading comprehension.

And if you ever figure out that I didn't say what you're claiming I said, and grasp what I actually said, you might realize that if they get in to the voter registration databases and delete registered voters so they can't vote, that will affect the vote count.

I hope you're just pretending to be as stupid as you appear.

No, and you must have flunked reality.

There is NO evidence that the Russians, or any one else, altered the vote and that is the only thing that counts (pun intended) in an election.

Did the Russians suck, or attempt to, voter info out of some of the systems? Probably. No different than the Chinese sucking the personal data out of the OMB systems. And overall the Chinese have been far more successful in their endeavors than the Russians.

Trying to use that as an excuse to invalidate the election is as dumb as it is a distraction. After all they're doing nothing more than what we do. It's a game everyone plays. Ever hear of stuxnet? And quite frankly we are better off for their attempts. They find a hole, we plug it. They do the same.

 

[about_average]

Let's pretend Hillary won. Would the hacking be a huge deal or not?

What an idiotic question.
If you paid an ounce of attention to my posts about election systems long before the 2016 election you wouldn't have to ask such a stupid question.
Here's one of the earlier ones when I searched for posts by me that had the word "voting".
http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=37780801&postcount=114

 

[about_average]

There is NO evidence that the Russians, or any one else, altered the vote and that is the only thing that counts (pun intended) in an election.

LMAO
You're a fucking dumbass.
You've put yourself up there with RightGuide and Spearchucker...the New 3 Stooges.