Am I blind? Or am I just looking in the wrong place?

[SudaStoleHer]

I am a 22 year old, bi-curious, white female that comes from a small rural town in the Midwest. When I went off to college I got really brave and decided to go to the big city! Which has a population of less than 50,000. One might not be surprised that there were only two black men in town, two black families in town(my hometown that is), and 6 black people in two. The dad(doctor) and his wife. His son(also doctor) and wife and two daughters.The first two generations were actually born in Africa, not that that explains my situation any better.

Well, I'll cut to the chase. I have never been more than just the acquaintance of a black man. I have the strange nagging desire to experience mere conversation with a black man who isn't giving me a physical at the clinic. And, I guess I'm in denial as to the revelation that black cocks are actually more likely to be ridiculous massive like I've been taught to believe through porn haha. Feel free to help me shed my ignorant Midwestern background. All we have is snow up here, and most of our states don't even have ONE professional sports team haha.


Whew, almost forgot what I was even talking about, lol. Where are all the black men on here? or simply their realistically, or not so much, sized "tools" lol?

 

[neakman]

I am a 22 year old, bi-curious, white female that comes from a small rural town in the Midwest. When I went off to college I got really brave and decided to go to the big city! Which has a population of less than 50,000. One might not be surprised that there were only two black men in town, two black families in town(my hometown that is), and 6 black people in two. The dad(doctor) and his wife. His son(also doctor) and wife and two daughters.The first two generations were actually born in Africa, not that that explains my situation any better.

Well, I'll cut to the chase. I have never been more than just the acquaintance of a black man. I have the strange nagging desire to experience mere conversation with a black man who isn't giving me a physical at the clinic. And, I guess I'm in denial as to the revelation that black cocks are actually more likely to be ridiculous massive like I've been taught to believe through porn haha. Feel free to help me shed my ignorant Midwestern background. All we have is snow up here, and most of our states don't even have ONE professional sports team haha.


Whew, almost forgot what I was even talking about, lol. Where are all the black men on here? or simply their realistically, or not so much, sized "tools" lol?

Interesting how you portrayed yourself on the AMPics thread as a young black woman. Putting up fake pics of yourself on here is NOT COOL. So why dont you fade away since you are probably some fat fuck who gets off impersonating your girls by stealing their pics.

 

[SudaStoleHer]

Interesting how you portrayed yourself on the AMPics thread as a young black woman. Putting up fake pics of yourself on here is NOT COOL. So why dont you fade away since you are probably some fat fuck who gets off impersonating your girls by stealing their pics.

Please show me what on earth you are talking about. Lol. I am 15/16ths Caucasian(Western European mixture), and 1/16th Native American(Chippewa).

Please don't make baseless, insulting claims. I'd rather not have to report you for harassment.

 

[Jada59]

Please show me what on earth you are talking about. Lol. I am 15/16ths Caucasian(Western European mixture), and 1/16th Native American(Chippewa).

Please don't make baseless, insulting claims. I'd rather not have to report you for harassment.

How is he harassing you? I saw your pics. I saw what he saw. I too am from the Midwest. We had black people there. My friend was married to a black man. I never thought of him as "that black man". He was just her husband and I never wondered what his cock looked like.

There are black men here. I am friends with some of them. Now they may want to contact you. I doubt it though. I'm certainly not giving you their names because I like them.

Bottom line, I see you as a troll. I shouldn't have replied but I did not like your reply to Neakman.

 

[SudaStoleHer]

How is he harassing you? I saw your pics. I saw what he saw. I too am from the Midwest. We had black people there. My friend was married to a black man. I never thought of him as "that black man". He was just her husband and I never wondered what his cock looked like.

There are black men here. I am friends with some of them. Now they may want to contact you. I doubt it though. I'm certainly not giving you their names because I like them.

Bottom line, I see you as a troll. I shouldn't have replied but I did not like your reply to Neakman.

I would say that it is harassment because his claims are slanderous and baseless. Also, your blind support of him lends itself to one of two things, first being blinding following the person's opinion with whom you are closer to. The second being a like of either intelligence or analytical skills

 

[SudaStoleHer]

Did I actually post photos and portray myself as a black girl?

Seems like the two of you are just being childish and rude. But, to put everyone at ease, and end this pointless dispute, here are the pictures I posted. The one of my chest, I'm sure many of you remember my EXTREMELY prominent tan lines.

https://i.imgur.com/8YIeP71.png?3
https://i.imgur.com/zmLt1MC.jpg?1

 

[SudaStoleHer]

P.S. A simple apology is all that I would require to be able to forgive you and move on from these petty fights.

 

[Jada59]

I would say that it is harassment because his claims are slanderous and baseless. Also, your blind support of him lends itself to one of two things, first being blinding following the person's opinion with whom you are closer to. The second being a like of either intelligence or analytical skills

I am close to a lot of people here and I have friends who are lawyers. And dare I use the word "oral" here but the definition of slander is oral defamation.

https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/slander

"n. oral defamation, in which someone tells one or more persons an untruth about another which untruth will harm the reputation of the person defamed. Slander is a civil wrong (tort) and can be the basis for a lawsuit. Damages (payoff for worth) for slander may be limited to actual (special) damages unless there is malicious intent, since such damages are usually difficult to specify and harder to prove. Some statements such as an untrue accusation of having committed a crime, having a loathsome disease, or being unable to perform one's occupation are treated as slander per se since the harm and malice are obvious, and therefore usually result in general and even punitive damage recovery by the person harmed. Words spoken over the air on television or radio are treated as libel (written defamation) and not slander on the theory that broadcasting reaches a large audience as much if not more than printed publications. (See: defamation, fair comment)"

I don't even think his comment falls under the category of libel. Lemme see.

Nope.

https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/libel

"1) n. to publish in print (including pictures), writing or broadcast through radio, television or film, an untruth about another which will do harm to that person or his/her reputation, by tending to bring the target into ridicule, hatred, scorn or contempt of others. Libel is the written or broadcast form of defamation, distinguished from slander which is oral defamation. It is a tort (civil wrong) making the person or entity (like a newspaper, magazine or political organization) open to a lawsuit for damages by the person who can prove the statement about him/her was a lie. Publication need only be to one person, but it must be a statement which claims to be fact, and is not clearly identified as an opinion. While it is sometimes said that the person making the libelous statement must have been intentional and malicious, actually it need only be obvious that the statement would do harm and is untrue. Proof of malice, however, does allow a party defamed to sue for "general damages" for damage to reputation, while an inadvertent libel limits the damages to actual harm (such as loss of business) called "special damages." "Libel per se" involves statements so vicious that malice is assumed and does not require a proof of intent to get an award of general damages. Libel against the reputation of a person who has died will allow surviving members of the family to bring an action for damages. Most states provide for a party defamed by a periodical to demand a published retraction. If the correction is made, then there is no right to file a lawsuit. Governmental bodies are supposedly immune for actions for libel on the basis that there could be no intent by a non-personal entity, and further, public records are exempt from claims of libel. However, there is at least one known case in which there was a financial settlement as well as a published correction when a state government newsletter incorrectly stated that a dentist had been disciplined for illegal conduct. The rules covering libel against a "public figure" (particularly a political or governmental person) are special, based on U. S. Supreme Court decisions. The key is that to uphold the right to express opinions or fair comment on public figures, the libel must be malicious to constitute grounds for a lawsuit for damages. Minor errors in reporting are not libel, such as saying Mrs. Jones was 55 when she was only 48, or getting an address or title incorrect. 2) v. to broadcast or publish a written defamatory statement. (See: defamation, slander, libel per se, public figure)"

He couldn't possibly have harmed your reputation. From where I sit, you already did that pretty well yourself, followed by a bunch of back pedaling. Oh and did I tell you that I'm psychic? Okay, not all the time, but a lot of the time.

Have a nice day!

 

[SudaStoleHer]

Finally Proof!

I am close to a lot of people here and I have friends who are lawyers. And dare I use the word "oral" here but the definition of slander is oral defamation.

https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/slander

"n. oral defamation, in which someone tells one or more persons an untruth about another which untruth will harm the reputation of the person defamed. Slander is a civil wrong (tort) and can be the basis for a lawsuit. Damages (payoff for worth) for slander may be limited to actual (special) damages unless there is malicious intent, since such damages are usually difficult to specify and harder to prove. Some statements such as an untrue accusation of having committed a crime, having a loathsome disease, or being unable to perform one's occupation are treated as slander per se since the harm and malice are obvious, and therefore usually result in general and even punitive damage recovery by the person harmed. Words spoken over the air on television or radio are treated as libel (written defamation) and not slander on the theory that broadcasting reaches a large audience as much if not more than printed publications. (See: defamation, fair comment)"

I don't even think his comment falls under the category of libel. Lemme see.

Nope.

https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/libel

"1) n. to publish in print (including pictures), writing or broadcast through radio, television or film, an untruth about another which will do harm to that person or his/her reputation, by tending to bring the target into ridicule, hatred, scorn or contempt of others. Libel is the written or broadcast form of defamation, distinguished from slander which is oral defamation. It is a tort (civil wrong) making the person or entity (like a newspaper, magazine or political organization) open to a lawsuit for damages by the person who can prove the statement about him/her was a lie. Publication need only be to one person, but it must be a statement which claims to be fact, and is not clearly identified as an opinion. While it is sometimes said that the person making the libelous statement must have been intentional and malicious, actually it need only be obvious that the statement would do harm and is untrue. Proof of malice, however, does allow a party defamed to sue for "general damages" for damage to reputation, while an inadvertent libel limits the damages to actual harm (such as loss of business) called "special damages." "Libel per se" involves statements so vicious that malice is assumed and does not require a proof of intent to get an award of general damages. Libel against the reputation of a person who has died will allow surviving members of the family to bring an action for damages. Most states provide for a party defamed by a periodical to demand a published retraction. If the correction is made, then there is no right to file a lawsuit. Governmental bodies are supposedly immune for actions for libel on the basis that there could be no intent by a non-personal entity, and further, public records are exempt from claims of libel. However, there is at least one known case in which there was a financial settlement as well as a published correction when a state government newsletter incorrectly stated that a dentist had been disciplined for illegal conduct. The rules covering libel against a "public figure" (particularly a political or governmental person) are special, based on U. S. Supreme Court decisions. The key is that to uphold the right to express opinions or fair comment on public figures, the libel must be malicious to constitute grounds for a lawsuit for damages. Minor errors in reporting are not libel, such as saying Mrs. Jones was 55 when she was only 48, or getting an address or title incorrect. 2) v. to broadcast or publish a written defamatory statement. (See: defamation, slander, libel per se, public figure)"

He couldn't possibly have harmed your reputation. From where I sit, you already did that pretty well yourself, followed by a bunch of back pedaling. Oh and did I tell you that I'm psychic? Okay, not all the time, but a lot of the time.

Have a nice day!

That's exactly what it would do, hurt my reputation. It would call me a liar, and also make sure that whatever credibly you haven't tried to take from me, would also disappear.

Thank you for doing the research to prove my point for both of us, however......

 

[Jada59]

P.S. A simple apology is all that I would require to be able to forgive you and move on from these petty fights.

Now you imply that black people don't get tan lines? OMFG! And I did not need to see your pics again.

I'm going to make popcorn now. I feel no need to apologize.

 

[neakman]

P.S. A simple apology is all that I would require to be able to forgive you and move on from these petty fights.

In your previous thread you STATED that you were a young black woman and put that picture up. The second one is clearly not the same woman.

 

[SudaStoleHer]

In your previous thread you STATED that you were a young black woman and put that picture up. The second one is clearly not the same woman.

https://i.imgur.com/8YIeP71.png?3
https://i.imgur.com/aA1V7GU.jpg?1
https://i.imgur.com/zmLt1MC.jpg?1

Please not the butt chin and similarities between the first two,
also, be sure to notice the same cross necklace and bone structure in the second two.

 

[Jada59]

Not buying it sweetie.

 

[Stacysmith287]

Hi

Suda is a lovely young lady who I chat with regularly.

 

[KrazieKat69]

I chat with her as well... the first pic yes she has makeup on and with the black lipstick it changes appearance. The photos to me are of her and are the same person.. Lighting and angles also mos lead the eye!

 

[IceyBlue]

Well, I'll cut to the chase. I have never been more than just the acquaintance of a black man. I have the strange nagging desire to experience mere conversation with a black man who isn't giving me a physical at the clinic. And, I guess I'm in denial as to the revelation that black cocks are actually more likely to be ridiculous massive like I've been taught to believe through porn haha.

Feel free to help me shed my ignorant Midwestern background.

I hope you don't mind a factual reply without all the acrimony and BS, it's just not my style.

My second wife was a mulatto (50 / 50 white Afrikaaner & Black) born in South Africa who (along with the rest of her family) came to Canada to escape the apartheid regime in SA.

By the time we met she was dating almost exclusively white guys but had through her teens to early 30's dated almost exclusively black guys.

I'm not exactly 'porn star hung' but not hung like a gerbil either.

One of the first comments she made the first time I slid into her was something to the effect of 'easy with that thing, I need some time to get used to the size of it.'.

At first I thought she was kidding. Nope. She said it was her personal experience that on average, the white guys were bigger than the black guys.

BTW, if it makes any difference, the black guys were also more likely to be 'hit it and quit it' types who's idea of foreplay was basically 'suck it bitch'.

She told me she'd been with quite a few guys before me, and lots more after too, we still have her over for a fuck-fest every now and then when she needs cash, and she says I'm still the only guy who can make her squirt.