Walgreens can refuse prescriptions based on morals

A pharmacist can but Walgreens doesn't have an issue with it obviously.

The pharmacist did forward her prescription to another Walgreens that filled it for her. But meanwhile, her post has gone viral.

A Walgreens spokesperson sent us the following statement:

"After learning what happened, we reached out to the patient and apologized for how the situation was handled. To respect the sincerely held beliefs of our pharmacists while at the same time meeting the needs of our patients, our policy allows pharmacists to step away from filling a prescription for which they have a moral objection. At the same time, they are also required to refer the prescription to another pharmacist or manager on duty to meet the patient's needs in a timely manner. We are looking into the matter to ensure that our patients' needs are handled properly."
 
The pharmacist did forward her prescription to another Walgreens that filled it for her. But meanwhile, her post has gone viral.


So basically what we have is a WHINEY CUNT looking to get sympathy pr something

What really is the problem other then a WHINEY CUNT?

Nothing!
 
No, the pharmacist should have filled the damn prescription. It is not their job to judge.
 
so fuck the law, right?

According to Arizona law,

"A pharmacy, hospital or health professional, or any employee of a pharmacy, hospital or health professional, who states in writing an objection to abortion, abortion medication, emergency contraception or any medication or device intended to inhibit or prevent implantation of a fertilized ovum on moral or religious grounds is not required to facilitate or participate in the provision of an abortion, abortion medication, emergency contraception or any medication or device intended to inhibit or prevent implantation of a fertilized ovum..."


But hey

Kick Sanders outa teh Red Hen
 
so what other LAWS should be ignored, SG? Tell us

TATTOOED THUG!
 
No, the pharmacist should have filled the damn prescription. It is not their job to judge.

but


the


law


says


they


can



and teh CUNT in question

was NOT harmed in any way shape or form

But hey, teh RED HEN!
 
Laws that allow the COLOREDS and WOMEN to vote is pretty fucked up
 
so fuck the law, right?

According to Arizona law,

"A pharmacy, hospital or health professional, or any employee of a pharmacy, hospital or health professional, who states in writing an objection to abortion, abortion medication, emergency contraception or any medication or device intended to inhibit or prevent implantation of a fertilized ovum on moral or religious grounds is not required to facilitate or participate in the provision of an abortion, abortion medication, emergency contraception or any medication or device intended to inhibit or prevent implantation of a fertilized ovum..."


But hey

Kick Sanders outa teh Red Hen

If you're in the medical field, your job is to treat the patient. Your delusions of a mythical being are subservient to the needs of the patient.
 
I'm pro-choice myself, and Ethical concerns often drive such GB debates.

But BotanyBoy once made a wise observation, after I expressed my wonder that so many GB men get over the top hysterical over abortions.

He said that many Dems. and Reps. don't care about abortions per se. For them, it's all about Budget allocation and money or outdoing the competition.

--------------

In the US, officials pushed the Abortion agenda in the 60's because the inflation and economy needed more people (women) in the workforce.

Stalin outlawed abortions in the 30's only because he was worried about the drop in natality.
Russian officials had no qualms about abortions until now when Russian's natality is decreasing drastically. I guess they saw what trouble the Germans got themselves into.
So Putin is now trying to rally Religious leaders on his side.
 
If you're in the medical field, your job is to treat the patient. Your delusions of a mythical being are subservient to the needs of the patient.

so fuck the law right?

what OTHER laws should be fucked?

that there are hundreds of places the WHINEY cunt coulda gotten the script filled and indeed git filled, means NOTHING?

but hey, BAKE TEH FRUCKING CAKE, BITCH!
 
The pharmacist did forward her prescription to another Walgreens that filled it for her. But meanwhile, her post has gone viral.


So basically what we have is a WHINEY CUNT looking to get sympathy pr something

What really is the problem other then a WHINEY CUNT?

Nothing!

I agree. Sara Sanders COULD have gone to another restaurant without complaining on her official government twitter account.
 
No, the pharmacist should have filled the damn prescription. It is not their job to judge.

It has nothing to do with their judging.

Yeah, because that law is pretty fucked.

No, you are.

Let me just make it easy and simple: you do not understand why.

You need to have respect for the person who does not want on his/her conscious that they facilitated something against their beliefs. Period.

But you can't respect that; coz you have no clue. Who else would choose to leave freedom and go live with the degenerates.


A bit gross your posts in here. But i know its only coz ur clueless.
 
so the real question is this

why did the "person" that started this thread

1-Lie about Walgreens?
2-See any issue at all?
:cool:
 
Those who don't want to perform their jobs can find different jobs.
 
Back
Top