The Mueller indictments still don’t add up to collusion

FakeNews

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jan 25, 2017
Posts
1,418
In just over one year, special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of the Trump campaign and Russia has generated five guilty pleas, 20 indictments, and more than 100 charges. None of these have anything to do with Mueller’s chief focus: the Russian government’s alleged meddling in the 2016 election and the Trump campaign’s suspected involvement. While it’s certainly possible that Mueller will make new indictments that go to the core of his case, what’s been revealed so far does not make a compelling brief for collusion.
https://www.thenation.com/article/mueller-indictments-still-dont-add-collusion/
 
Meddling isn't criminal

Collusion isn't criminal

And non of the two happened
 
Trump dictated the false story his son released about the Veselnitskaya meeting.

If he’s not a colluder, at least he’s a dictator.
 
There is no federal statute against "collusion."

So that would make it ok in your mind?
Just for the sake of argument let's say they found that Trump and his team did collude with the Russians. I have no idea if they did and I'm not saying they did. Just an example.
If that were the case you'd be ok with it since there's no law against it?
 
So that would make it ok in your mind?
Just for the sake of argument let's say they found that Trump and his team did collude with the Russians. I have no idea if they did and I'm not saying they did. Just an example.
If that were the case you'd be ok with it since there's no law against it?

Let me ask you a question. Now that we "know" the Clinton Campaign and the DNC paid Russian agents to compile a phony Dossier to undermine the election of Donald Trump, did they commit a federal crime?
 
So that would make it ok in your mind?
Just for the sake of argument let's say they found that Trump and his team did collude with the Russians. I have no idea if they did and I'm not saying they did. Just an example.
If that were the case you'd be ok with it since there's no law against it?

Its an affront to the American people to belive 100K of FB ads.....half of which was spect AFTER the elections....about 10K spent on CANDIDATE specific targets. of which 5K was Trump and 5K for CuntClinton amounts to anything

Twitter posts etc....FB "ads"......effected ELECTIONS? REALLY?

How could any candidate COLLUDE with anyone? How will that work?

Its BSJust think, MuleLiar has NOTHING going on for a YR.....Meanwhile, NIGGER hussein AXED the INTEL guys to come up with INFO after the election and have it BEFORE jan 20....and they did

ITS BS!


Its a COUP
 
Its an affront to the American people to belive 100K of FB ads.....half of which was spect AFTER the elections....about 10K spent on CANDIDATE specific targets. of which 5K was Trump and 5K for CuntClinton amounts to anything

Twitter posts etc....FB "ads"......effected ELECTIONS? REALLY?

How could any candidate COLLUDE with anyone? How will that work?

Its BSJust think, MuleLiar has NOTHING going on for a YR.....Meanwhile, NIGGER hussein AXED the INTEL guys to come up with INFO after the election and have it BEFORE jan 20....and they did

ITS BS!


Its a COUP

Non-responsive.
 
Let me ask you a question. Now that we "know" the Clinton Campaign and the DNC paid Russian agents to compile a phony Dossier to undermine the election of Donald Trump, did they commit a federal crime?

Dude is there some reason you just can't answer? I didn't ask about Clinton, I don't give a fuck. Either you got a problem with collusion or you don't. kind of a yes or no answer.
 
Dude is there some reason you just can't answer? I didn't ask about Clinton, I don't give a fuck. Either you got a problem with collusion or you don't. kind of a yes or no answer.

Look, if talking to the Russians was a crime the majority of members of both houses of the Congress and half the international business community would all be looking at grand juries. It isn't against the law to talk to the Russians. It is against the law to conspire with a foreign government to violate the laws of the United States, however.
 
Look, if talking to the Russians was a crime the majority of members of both houses of the Congress and half the international business community would all be looking at grand juries. It isn't against the law to talk to the Russians. It is against the law to conspire with a foreign government to violate the laws of the United States, however.

You seriously can't say yes or no. Either you think it's wrong or you don't. Fucking pussy.
 
Repugnican Newspeak explained

So, collusion in this situation would have only been a slam-dunk federal crime if a Democrat had done what the Trump campaign did. That form of Orwellian Newspeak is the underlying theme of every Repugnican thread on this board.


Note that the OP for this thread is named Fake News.
 
Dude is there some reason you just can't answer? I didn't ask about Clinton, I don't give a fuck. Either you got a problem with collusion or you don't. kind of a yes or no answer.

define it:cool:

its OK

I'll wait:cool:
 
You seriously can't say yes or no. Either you think it's wrong or you don't. Fucking pussy.

It's not wrong to talk to the Russians, you ignorant nutless dunce. You can't define "collusion" dipshit, that's why it isn't against the law.
 
So, collusion in this situation would have only been a slam-dunk federal crime if a Democrat had done what the Trump campaign did. That form of Orwellian Newspeak is the underlying theme of every Repugnican thread on this board.


Note that the OP for this thread is named Fake News.


"Collusion" doesn't exist in any Federal criminal Statute.

Hillary's email debacle may comprise sufficient illegal acts to constituted a crime under several Federal Statutes. The IG's report is due out today so we'll find out what really happened without partisan opinions leading the results.
 
"Collusion" doesn't exist in any Federal criminal Statute.

Hillary's email debacle may comprise sufficient illegal acts to constituted a crime under several Federal Statutes. The IG's report is due out today so we'll find out what really happened without partisan opinions leading the results.

I doubt that
 
This is a coup d’etat in slow ‘OJ Simpson style slow speed chase, and as in that instance, there’s no conviction of the real criminals, Hillary and Obama. Best thing for the country would be for Trump to do what Gerald Ford did with Nixon, and pardon both Hillary and Obama for obstruction of justice and treason. It’s not possible to appeal a pardon, therefore as close to the deserved convictions as we’ll ever get. Mueller can go fuck himself.
 
It's not wrong to talk to the Russians, you ignorant nutless dunce. You can't define "collusion" dipshit, that's why it isn't against the law.

So if they found that Trump and his team did collude you'd be ok with that?
 
The guy with the best case for collusion is now and will always be Bernie Sanders, the entire DNC apparatus conspired to fuck him ten ways to Sunday. Fact is, even that was just the tip of the Clinton/Obama iceberg...
 
Back
Top