One month, no notice, no apology

[someoneyouknow]

It's been a month since someone in the con artist's cabal made the comment that John McCain's opposition to the CIA director nominee Gina Haspel didn't matter because he's "dying". In that time, no apology has come out of either the royal toilet, nor has anyone been named who made the uncouth comment. The only thing which has happened has been a furious investigation into who notified the world of the derogatory remark.

Today, in a quiet, almost skulking fashion, the perpetrator of the dastardly comment was allowed to walk away, head held high. Her name? Kelly Sadler.

It was reported that Sadler did contact McCain's daughter and apologize, but the question remained, why did Sadler still have a job?

Just like with Michael Flynn, the con artist's corrupt contingent let the malignant maligner on the payroll for a month while they scrambled to find ways to not apologize and to see if the foul-mouthed cunt could be placed in another position.

Such are the actions we've come to expect from the fake president.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/05/politics/kelly-sadler-white-house/index.html

 

[beerlovr88]

America has achieved unprecedented success; record low unemployment rate, tax reform, strengthened border security, and now it's also on the verge of an unprecedented sit down with one of the most dangerous regimes in the world.

Liberals convinced themselves that Trump would lead to nuclear war, and now he's on the verge of winning a Nobel peace price for preventing it. Liberals said that the economy would collapse, and now we've seen unprecedented economic growth. Liberals said that Trump 'lied' about the FBI spying on his campaign, only to double down on their most curious distinction between a 'spy' and a 'secret informant who can't be named'.

Of course, fake news networks at CNN like to this ignore this record breaking success and instead focus on coarse commentary from press aids, as if people really care.

So keep it up with the liberal logic because if this is the best criticism they can come up with for the greatest modern president in US history, then at this rate I can't think of a more guaranteed outcome than Trump 2020.

 

[KeithD]

America has achieved unprecedented success; .

Interesting that you've been snookered into seeing where we are in the United States now, over the last year, as any element of a success. (We need a wow smiley here).

 

[phrodeau]

America has achieved unprecedented success; record low unemployment rate, tax reform, strengthened border security, and now it's also on the verge of an unprecedented sit down with one of the most dangerous regimes in the world.

Liberals convinced themselves that Trump would lead to nuclear war, and now he's on the verge of winning a Nobel peace price for preventing it. Liberals said that the economy would collapse, and now we've seen unprecedented economic growth. Liberals said that Trump 'lied' about the FBI spying on his campaign, only to double down on their most curious distinction between a 'spy' and a 'secret informant who can't be named'.

Of course, fake news networks at CNN like to this ignore this record breaking success and instead focus on coarse commentary from press aids, as if people really care.

So keep it up with the liberal logic because if this is the best criticism they can come up with for the greatest modern president in US history, then at this rate I can't think of a more guaranteed outcome than Trump 2020.

Trump meeting Kim Jong-Un isn't a diplomatic victory for the US, although it is for North Korea. For the US it's more like cruising the slums.

 

[beerlovr88]

Interesting that you've been snookered into seeing where we are in the United States now, over the last year, as any element of a success. (We need a wow smiley here).

Further interesting still how I've provided metrics to indicate that success, but you couldn't be bothered into offering any metric at all to indicate that it hasn't been successful.

 

[KeithD]

I do love how the Trump supporters are calling the results of the Kim-Trump meeting before it happens, like Trump had the victory coin cast even before the first time he called off the meeting. It hasn't happened yet. I know that Trump and his supporters will spin it as a Trump victory no matter what happens (even if it doesn't happen), but it hasn't happened yet. It could go in so many directions, unlike any such meeting before in history--because it hasn't had the preparation that any such meeting in history has had before. Yes, we could discover that doing it on the fly like this with no preparation or real attainable goal in mind (the DPRK ain't gonna give up their nuke development, even if they sign on the dotted like that they will--we've been there, done that before)--but we don't know. They haven't met yet. Put your commemorative coins away until at least June 13th.

 

[beerlovr88]

Trump meeting Kim Jong-Un isn't a diplomatic victory for the US, although it is for North Korea. For the US it's more like cruising the slums.

Right. When it was announced that Trump was meeting with Kim Jong-Un, liberals declared it a success for N. Korea. When Trump cancelled the meeting with Kim Jon-Un, liberals once again declared it a a success for N. Korea.

See how liberal logic works?

 

[KeithD]

Further interesting still how I've provided metrics to indicate that success, but you couldn't be bothered into offering any metric at all to indicate that it hasn't been successful.

You're right. I couldn't be bothered with your metrics. Just like you can't be bothered with common sense and the venal man dancing right in front of your face, flipping you the finger, laughing, and singing a chorus of "It's me, it's me; it's all about me."

 

[phrodeau]

Further interesting still how I've provided metrics to indicate that success, but you couldn't be bothered into offering any metric at all to indicate that it hasn't been successful.

You mean like the metric of being on the verge of winning the Nobel Peace Prize?

 

[phrodeau]

Right. When it was announced that Trump was meeting with Kim Jong-Un, liberals declared it a success for N. Korea. When Trump cancelled the meeting with Kim Jon-Un, liberals once again declared it a a success for N. Korea.

See how liberal logic works?

Not seeing it yet. Got a real news source?

 

[beerlovr88]

I do love how the Trump supporters are calling the results of the Kim-Trump meeting before it happens

I guess some people might be getting cocky after calling the election when there was near unanimous consensus among political pundits that Clinton had it in the bag.

Regardless, hopefully these Trump supporters will do a better job than the liberals who predicted an economic recession, the devaluation of the dollar and nuclear war as a result of Trump being elected.

 

[beerlovr88]

Not seeing it yet. Got a real news source?

A real 'news' source that depicts liberal logic? Yeah just read anything on CNN.

You mean like the metric of being on the verge of winning the Nobel Peace Prize?

The metric of an unprecedented sit down with a N. Korean dictator, the first step needed to take place if peace is a priority.

For comparison, what did Obama do exactly to win his Nobel peace prize after just 9 months in office?

 

[phrodeau]

A real 'news' source that depicts liberal logic? Yeah just read anything on CNN.


The metric of an unprecedented sit down with a N. Korean dictator, the first step needed to take place if peace is a priority.

For comparison, what did Obama do exactly to win his Nobel peace prize after just 9 months in office?

Any US President could have sat down with the leader of North Korea if they wanted to. Trump's the first one to think it's a neat thing to do.

For that he deserves the Booby Prize.

 

[KeithD]

I guess some people might be getting cocky after calling the election when there was near unanimous consensus among political pundits that Clinton had it in the bag.

Regardless, hopefully these Trump supporters will do a better job than the liberals who predicted an economic recession, the devaluation of the dollar and nuclear war as a result of Trump being elected.

Ah, yes. Obama, Hillary, Obama, Hillary (No, don't look at the venal man in the White House) Obama, Hillary, Obama, Hillary

 

[KeithD]

Right. When it was announced that Trump was meeting with Kim Jong-Un, liberals declared it a success for N. Korea. When Trump cancelled the meeting with Kim Jon-Un, liberals once again declared it a a success for N. Korea.

See how liberal logic works?

Bingo, you got it. (You don't understand it, but you got it). The instant Trump agreed to meet Kim, he elevated Kim internationally--for the very first time in U.S.-DPRK relations. So, yes, just the announcement of a meeting agreement is a Kim win. If Trump wins too (it can't be instead; Kim has already got a big win from it), that will be something that is still to happen. It hasn't happened. Trump hasn't won anything from this yet (other that the return of three live hostages, while ignoring the return of a murdered one--with, historically, this having gone on for fifty years, the Koreans seizing and holding hostages and giving them back when they want to leave the impression of being reasonable about something). The whole point is that if Trump is going to win something in this, it's something that still has to happen. It's not something that should be celebrated yet. It hasn't happened. The only win at this point is Kim's.

Any chance you can stop looking at the confetti the venal con man is tossing up in the air and understand that yet?

Sure, celebrate a Trump win of any sort in this. Nothing else has worked. It's fine if he tries. But there's been no Trump win on North Korea yet and he's already just given up mentioning a murdered student and shown that he's the one who most wants this, so he's not starting off in a brilliant negotiating position (and his long list of bankruptcies and trail on fraud charges and inability to tell the truth about anything don't speak well of his negotiating abilities).


Oh, look, glittery confetti. Oh, look, the commemorative coins have already been struck.

 

[beerlovr88]

Any US President could have sat down with the leader of North Korea if they wanted to.

Such a bold claim! And try as I might to respect everyone's opinions, liberals make it so difficult when they spout their opinions as if they might be able to trump very simple and verifiable facts. So unless you want to reconsider what you've said, either George Washington is capable of time travel or liberals struggle immensely with very simple facts.

Take your pick.

 

[KeithD]

Deflection. Distraction. Oh, look, a graduate of Trump U.

 

[beerlovr88]

The instant Trump agreed to meet Kim, he elevated Kim internationally--for the very first time in U.S.-DPRK relations. So, yes, just the announcement of a meeting agreement is a Kim win.

Ah yes, the imaginary 'elevation' argument that liberals cling on to so desperately. Remember when Trump won the election and liberals criticized it as a 'bad' thing because it meant that the US was 'de-elevated' internationally?

Liberals rely so heavily on these non-specified metrics that arbitrarily determine the 'elevated' or 'de-elevated' status of a country because anything remotely fact based just confuses them. And of course, you're more than welcome to try and 'prove me wrong' here, but then you'll have to engage in uncharted territory: actual specifics.

America is not Europe, and most Americans do not want to follow the footsteps of their progressive policies where hate speech is illegal, racism is illegal, firearms are banned, refugees are welcomed with open arms... heck, even certain physical gestures have been criminalized.

Liberals can cry all they like that Trump 'de-elevated' the US; the silent majority within America still perceive Trump as a living embodiment of the true American spirit that we want to advertise to the world, where personal liberties and freedoms are valued above the hurt feelings of others.

 

[KeithD]

Deflection, distraction. Just not a very good example of an attempt of that.

 

[phrodeau]

Such a bold claim! And try as I might to respect everyone's opinions, liberals make it so difficult when they spout their opinions as if they might be able to trump very simple and verifiable facts. So unless you want to reconsider what you've said, either George Washington is capable of time travel or liberals struggle immensely with very simple facts.

Take your pick.

Gee, you got me there. I forgot all about George Washington. I guess I should enroll in Trump University.

 

[beerlovr88]

Gee, you got me there. I forgot all about George Washington. I guess I should enroll in Trump University.

Did I really get you? Meh. If you say so. And you can enroll in whatever university you'd like; last I checked a president still can't negotiate with the leader of a country that doesn't exist.

Of course, judging solely by your posting history these little fact based details just aren't important to you.

 

[KeithD]

Doing a zinger on George Washington certainly gave you the opportunity you needed--as tenuous as it was--to stop trying to pursue your position on the North Korea talks.

Fine. You can wait and see what actually happens with the rest of us. While you wait, you can dream of the Nobel Prize you've already awarded Trump, the victory coins Trump has already had struck, and his signature on your Trump University diploma.

 

[phrodeau]

I honestly regret not typing out, "any US President who was elected after 1945, when North Korea was first created, would have been able to meet with the leader of North Korea."

I guess it pays to know how intelligent your audience is.

 

[WrongVerb]

America has achieved unprecedented success; record low unemployment rate, tax reform, strengthened border security, and now it's also on the verge of an unprecedented sit down with one of the most dangerous regimes in the world.

Your version of success is coming at the expense of turning America into an oligarchy where your rights, protected from government interference, can be deeply and unfairly infringed upon by business.

Further, the very idea of a free America is being replaced by a fascist Cult of America where your rights can be subverted under the banner of the flag. (Look no further than today's rant about the Eagles visit for evidence of this.)

But hey, you can buy more useless crap, so...success!

 

[beerlovr88]

Your version of success is coming at the expense of turning America into an oligarchy

So according to you, low unemployment and tax reform = turning America into an oligarchy?

Ah, liberal logic at it's finest. And by all means feel free to volunteer an 'alternative' version of success, but without a CNN article to support you I fail to see how you'd be able to articulate such a narrative.