So, you think this memo thing has legs?

Just a reminder: The Russian minister of defense and the US UN ambassador (cabinet members of the govt's) have both declared that Russia is waging war on the US. The US Constitution, Art.3 Sec.3, is very specific about what US citizens providing aid and comfort to Russia face.
 
Just a reminder: The Russian minister of defense and the US UN ambassador (cabinet members of the govt's) have both declared that Russia is waging war on the US. The US Constitution, Art.3 Sec.3, is very specific about what US citizens providing aid and comfort to Russia face.

Waging war? I thought Trump was supposed to be sucking up to the Russians?
 
Because they want him to name names. And his change of legal team the other day suggests he may just be doing that.

"Name names" of people accused (or even suspected) of doing exactly what? <------ been asking this question ever since Team Hillary invented the "Russian Collusion" excuse a couple of days after her ignominious defeat.
 
"Name names" of people accused (or even suspected) of doing exactly what? <------ been asking this question ever since Team Hillary invented the "Russian Collusion" excuse a couple of days after her ignominious defeat.

Funny how he has to be "naming names" now after the FBI wire-tapped his phones and email and Twitter and everything else for a year and didn't come up with any names.
 
Funny how he has to be "naming names" now after the FBI wire-tapped his phones and email and Twitter and everything else for a year and didn't come up with any names.

Well, to be fair-

The FBI has to figure out what was actually done and what law was violated before Page (or anyone) can give them the "who" in "whodunnit".

Gotta have an "it" before you can have an actual whodunnit, and so far, no one seems to be able to articulate that.

It's an investigation in search of a crime.

No idea who is guilty of what, but they are quite certain that somebody is guilty of something.

It's like some really bad, modernized version of Catch-22.
 
Well, to be fair-

The FBI has to figure out what was actually done and what law was violated before Page (or anyone) can give them the "who" in "whodunnit".

Gotta have an "it" before you can have an actual whodunnit, and so far, no one seems to be able to articulate that.

It's an investigation in search of a crime.

No idea who is guilty of what, but they are quite certain that somebody is guilty of something.

It's like some really bad, modernized version of Catch-22.

So you're privy to FBI intel? Tell us more, we're all ears.
 
Patience, patience, patience...

FISA courts have been subpoenaed for the their notes, judge(s) will soon follow. Congress - and ONLY Congress - has FULL constitutionally authority to air all the truth, and, of course, to impeach and remove from office any who obstruct.
 
Have I overused the image of chickens squawking louder as the fox nears the henhouse? Here's another: The brave mother sparrow fakes a broken wing to lead a predator from her nest. Or this one: When two are chased by a bear, you needn't outrun the bear, only the other guy. Who can distract the predator -- and who will just be left behind, sacrificed to save Tromp?

Waging war? I thought Trump was supposed to be sucking up to the Russians?
Ask about the mandated sanctions DJT refuses to impose.

Funny how he has to be "naming names" now after the FBI wire-tapped his phones and email and Twitter and everything else for a year and didn't come up with any names.
And you know what the FBI has... how?

It's an investigation in search of a crime.
I guess you'll have to await the indictments, like everyone else.
 
And you know what the FBI has... how?

No clue what the FBI has. I was responding to a post that opined that Page was with new attorneys and "naming names." My point was that after being FISA'd by the FBI for a year, it would seem that the FBI would surely have at least one or two names that Page would have said while being wire-tapped or while agents were reading through his email.
Wouldn't you think it suspicious at this point of the investigation, after all these months under heavy surveillance, if they don't have any names?
 
Have I overused the image of chickens squawking louder as the fox nears the henhouse? Here's another: The brave mother sparrow fakes a broken wing to lead a predator from her nest. Or this one: When two are chased by a bear, you needn't outrun the bear, only the other guy. Who can distract the predator -- and who will just be left behind, sacrificed to save Tromp?


Ask about the mandated sanctions DJT refuses to impose.


And you know what the FBI has... how?


I guess you'll have to await the indictments, like everyone else.

Yes, your imagination is always in overdrive with literally every single post you make. I'm not being hyperbolic with that generalization.

You don't seem to need to wait for an indictment before routinely violating federal law by calling for the assassination (specifically by hanging, usually) of public officials.

The question remains that neither you nor anyone else who pontificates endlessly here about this administration's crimes is: indictment for doing WHAT??

It's a pretty simple question and nobody is willing to be even general much less specific about what it is that they suspect was done by whom.
 
Obama to Chris Wallace, April 2016:
I do not talk to FBI directors about pending investigations. We have a strict line and always have maintained it. I guarantee it.

FBI lawyer Lisa Page to lover & FBI Deputy Director Counter Intelligence Peter Strzok, email explaining why she was preparing reports for then-FBI Director James Comey, September 2016:
potus wants to know everything we’re doing.

Former Obama National Security Adviser Susan Rice, in an email suspiciously addressed to herself, January 20, 2017 @12:15:32 PM, literal minutes after Donald Trump was inaugurated as the 45th President of the United States, documenting a meeting conducted two weeks earlier on January 5, 2017:
From a national security perspective, however, President Obama said he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia.

...The President asked Comey to inform him if anything changes in the next few weeks that should affect how we share classified information with the incoming team. Comey said he would.
 
:D

Now the Sen Intel Comm is setting sights on Brennan & Clapper...and Harry Reid will eventually get dragged-in with that.

What's so BITCHIN' about all this is that Grassley & Graham are greatly beholden to the very deep state big-time players they're now politically pushing against...

...which means - HOPEFULLY - it won't be too long before the deep state starts really spilling the beans on those deep staters themselves!

This whole deal is so friggin' rotted from within that all these cockroaches are going to #BringItDown all on themselves!

USA! USA! USA! USA!
 
Do you suppose standard prison garb will fit James Comey, who stands 6 feet 8 inches tall?
 
Back
Top