A year later, an investigation in search of a crime.

[BeeZeBody]

 

[Queefer]

A year? It's been like 8 years you twits have been trying to convict hillary.

 

[Adre]

Four indictments, two convictions, and counting. Benghazi, emails, zero.

 

[CeriseBuss]

Four indictments, two convictions, and counting. Benghazi, emails, zero.

You're forgetting how Hillary conspired with the DNC to rig the primaries against Bernie!

Isn't conspiracy to fraudulently influence and election a crime?

 

[Colonel Hogan]

You're forgetting how Hillary conspired with the DNC to rig the primaries against Bernie!

Isn't conspiracy to fraudulently influence and election a crime?

No. Not the way Hillary and her homies did it. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2017/08/25/florida-judge-dismisses-fraud-lawsuit-against-dnc/?utm_term=.3b9e8688b3f7

 

[Que]

No. Not the way Hillary and her homies did it. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2017/08/25/florida-judge-dismisses-fraud-lawsuit-against-dnc/?utm_term=.3b9e8688b3f7

There's got to be some place though that they didn't cross their T's and dot their I's on campaign finance reporting requirements. The DNC was a defacto subsidiary of Hillary's campaign. They used it to launder big donations. They're going to go after manafort for 11 year old money laundering they ought to go after Podesta as well.

 

[jaF0]

All this time and BB still can't figure out what banned means.

 

[jaF0]

The DNC was a defacto subsidiary of Hillary's campaign.

Like the RNC and Bush II? And the RNC and Mitt'ns?

 

[phrodeau]

Remind me which party wants to get big money out of politics.