Barry, you've got some 'splaining to do!" LMAO!!

[TalkRadio]

Former President Barack Obama told Britain’s Prince Harry in a BBC 4 interview that hashtags alone do not bring about social change.

The Obama administration was notorious for using hashtags in lieu of actual diplomacy or military action to address urgent problems.

The strategy reached its zenith (or nadir) in 2014, when First Lady Michelle Obama tweeted “#BringBackOurGirls” in response to the mass abduction of Nigerian schoolgirls by the terrorist group Boko Haram.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...-bbc-prince-harry-hashtags-dont-bring-change/

 

[Richard_P_Feynman]

http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...-bbc-prince-harry-hashtags-dont-bring-change/

Thanks for showing us, again, how shit Breitbart is, fuckface.

 

[Luk]

Thanks for showing us, again, how shit Breitbart is, fuckface.

It's more telling that the idiot "LMAO'd!" over something this insignificantly stupid.

 

[Rightguide]

Thanks for showing us, again, how shit Breitbart is, fuckface.

So you can point to the success of Michelle's hashtag campaign in bringing about the return of those girls, right?

 

[Richard_P_Feynman]

So you can point to the success of Michelle's hashtag campaign in bringing about the return of those girls, right?

More like, Michelle's tweet wasn't the centerpiece of US policy.

 

[Rightguide]

More like, Michelle's tweet wasn't the centerpiece of US policy.

What other effort did the Obama's make?

 

[Richard_P_Feynman]

What other effort did the Obama's make?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chibok_schoolgirls_kidnapping

Look under "International governmental response."

 

[Rightguide]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chibok_schoolgirls_kidnapping

Look under "International governmental response."

Okay, fair enough. A tepid but justifiable response considering they weren't our kids, no American national interests involved, and our military is already mission crept to death as it is. But at least the effort was real in comparison to the hashtag loser.

 

[Richard_P_Feynman]

But at least the effort was real in comparison to the hashtag loser.

That's a rather harsh way of talking about Trump.

 

[Luk]

That's a rather harsh way of talking about Trump.

I thought vettebirther was taking the piss to //////

 

[Rightguide]

That's a rather harsh way of talking about Trump.

I was referring to Michelle's hashtag effort, but you knew that. The president is orders of magnitude more effective with his tweets. Totally leapfrogging the deep state and it media voice.

 

[Luk]

I was referring to Michelle's hashtag effort, but you knew that. The president is orders of magnitude more effective with his tweets. Totally leapfrogging the deep state and it media voice.

You just compared a civilian's hashtag to the "President's" tweets.

AND called them effective. Which dumbass tweet do you think was most "effective"?

 

[Richard_P_Feynman]

Was it the tweet about the nukes that was the most effective?

I bet it was the tweet about the nukes.

 

[Luk]

Was it the tweet about the nukes that was the most effective?

I bet it was the tweet about the nukes.

vettebirther liked the covfefe one. It actually made sense to him.

 

[Rightguide]

You just compared a civilian's hashtag to the "President's" tweets.

AND called them effective. Which dumbass tweet do you think was most "effective"?

First of all you dumb fucks have to understand the purpose of those tweets. In that sense they are very effective. Michelle's hashtag might as well have been a hash mark for all of it's effectiveness.