How To Get To Heaven When You Die

DO YOU ACCEPT JESUS GIFT OF SALVATION BELIEVING HE DIED N ROSE AGAIN FOR YOUR SINS?

  • YES

    Votes: 48 16.4%
  • NO

    Votes: 148 50.5%
  • I ALREADY ACCEPTED JESUS GIFT OF SALVATION BEFORE

    Votes: 62 21.2%
  • OTHER

    Votes: 35 11.9%

  • Total voters
    293
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thank you for sharing that. I debate in several places. Yes, people can be very vicious sometimes, especially when they hear the gospel. It's interesting how much anger arises in so many who don't believe it. That's actually evidence that it's true. The Bible says that the light offends the dark.
I particularly like the story of Legion, the plurality of demons that Jesus cast out of some unfortunate and into a herd of pigs which promptly slaughtered themselves.

Whose pigs were they? They weren't Jesus's pigs, surely not. They weren't the property of any Jewish people, unclean animals that they are. So what was Jesus thinking by disposing of a Gentile's livestock in that way? Seems practically criminal to me.
 
Dear friends, Take this moment, If you want to accept Jesus Christ free gift of salvation, Or if you have any doubts about your salvation, pray this from your heart, humbly to God:

"Dear Lord Jesus, I believe that You died on the Cross and Rose from the dead for my sins. I ask you to come into my heart and forgive me for my sins, save me, take me to be with You when I die. I now receive You as my Lord and Savior. Thank You for saving me. In Jesus holy name, Amen."

If you have placed your faith in Jesus Christ and meant it with all of your heart, you are now a child of God and will go to heaven
 
Actually, I'm a pagan. And frankly, I don't see where any of the Abrahamic religions make sense. A sense of "mystery" isn't going to make me turn off my brain. I'm not impressed by such platitudes. I'm impressed by empirical data, by evidence, by facts, etc.

So, there.

There is a far simpler explanation for why the Bible contradicts itself: it was written by men and lumped together on the orders of men, bishops and such, particularly under the guidance of the Roman Emperor. It was also written by men who believed that the Earth was flat and that the Earth was the center of the Cosmos. Need I say more?

Pagan simply means non Christian or Jewish. The Bible affirms that the earth is ROUND and Hangs in outer space. How could they have known that? It doesn't contradict it's self either. It wasn't put together by bishops either. You need to do more research.


Isa 40:22 It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in

Job 26:7 He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing.
 
Pagan simply means non Christian or Jewish. The Bible affirms that the earth is ROUND and Hangs in outer space. How could they have known that? It doesn't contradict it's self either. It wasn't put together by bishops either. You need to do more research.


Isa 40:22 It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in

Job 26:7 He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing.

The final canon was approved by the bishops. It does contradict itself in several places. And there are passages that teach that the Earth is flat and the center of the Cosmos, which contradict the others. Not to mention the big doozy of a "young Earth", six-day creation with a talking snake and a magic rib woman.
 
The final canon was approved by the bishops. It does contradict itself in several places. And there are passages that teach that the Earth is flat and the center of the Cosmos, which contradict the others. Not to mention the big doozy of a "young Earth", six-day creation with a talking snake and a magic rib woman.



THIS VIDEO WILL EXPLAIN HOW THE NEW TESTAMENT OF THE BIBLE WAS CANONIZED (CAME TO BE) PART 1 AUTOMATICALLY MERGES INTO PART 2

WHOLE VIDEO:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_bbXRVS5JY

No it doesn't contradict it's self. Show me those passages you are talking about. Yes the earth is 6,000 years old. That's what the scientific evidence actually says.
 
“The question of whether there exists a Creator and Ruler of the Universe has been answered in the affirmative by some of the highest intellects that have ever existed.”

–Charles Darwin, the founder of evolutionary biology

--------------------------------------

The more I study science, the more I believe in God.”

–Albert Einstein

-------------------------------------
God [is] the author of the universe, and the free establisher of the laws of motion.”

—Physicist and chemist Robert Boyle, who is considered to be the founder of modern chemistry. Boyle was a devout Christian.

--------------------------------------
“I believe that the more thoroughly science is studied, the further does it take us from anything comparable to atheism.”

“If you study science deep enough and long enough, it will force you to believe in God.”

—Lord William Kelvin, who was noted for his theoretical work on thermodynamics, the concept of absolute zero and the Kelvin temperature scale based upon it. Kelvin was a devout Christian.

----------------------------------------

"God created everything by number, weight and measure.”

“In the absence of any other proof, the thumb alone would convince me of God’s existence.”

“I have a fundamental belief in the Bible as the Word of God, written by those who were inspired. I study the Bible daily.”

—Sir Isaac Newton, who is widely regarded to have been the greatest scientist the world has ever produced. Newton was a devout Christian.

:cool:
 
Actually, Evolutionary Scientist is an oxymoron.

No. Scientist requires no prefix nor suffix. Science is about a methodology, Belief is not, and never can be a factor.

All Creation stories are about magic - nothing to do with science, however good the story.

Ask yourself this question Xfrodo - How is Christmas on the planets of MACSO647-JD? Answering that will create a few problems for you. ;)
 
No. Scientist requires no prefix nor suffix. Science is about a methodology, Belief is not, and never can be a factor.

All Creation stories are about magic - nothing to do with science, however good the story.

Ask yourself this question Xfrodo - How is Christmas on the planets of MACSO647-JD? Answering that will create a few problems for you. ;)

Ooooh, good one!
 
No. Scientist requires no prefix nor suffix. Science is about a methodology, Belief is not, and never can be a factor.

All Creation stories are about magic - nothing to do with science, however good the story.

Wrong.

Ask yourself this question Xfrodo - How is Christmas on the planets of MACSO647-JD? Answering that will create a few problems for you. ;)

Answer it on earth first dear, then worry about galaxies far far away :rolleyes:

Science is also realistic.

Ooooh, good one!


hehe.. calm ur horses, not really.

here's a couple more for ya:

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTRQoe1DyHgeA76kdILOWh3hGoufkTiwHMFXDfmWoDtq4k1ngPpuQ

https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/56b0ef5c1800002d0080b1bc.jpeg?ops=scalefit_600_noupscale


But you never reply to those ;)

Understandable. they are baffling.
 
Wrong.



Answer it on earth first dear, then worry about galaxies far far away :rolleyes:

Science is also realistic.




hehe.. calm ur horses, not really.

here's a couple more for ya:

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTRQoe1DyHgeA76kdILOWh3hGoufkTiwHMFXDfmWoDtq4k1ngPpuQ

https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/56b0ef5c1800002d0080b1bc.jpeg?ops=scalefit_600_noupscale


But you never reply to those ;)

Understandable. they are baffling.
Einstein lacked understanding. It goes without saying.

He would be the first to admit that, too. He never claimed to be an authority on religion.
 
Einstein lacked understanding. It goes without saying.

He would be the first to admit that, too. He never claimed to be an authority on religion.

:eek:

LOL

You clearly lack understanding yourself - but that's an old fact. The new one is that you know very little about Einstein. He changed many times the type of theist he was, but always was one, and especially later in his life.

But no matter; more?

http://izquotes.com/quotes-pictures/quote-science-brings-men-nearer-to-god-louis-pasteur-258359.jpg

https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/56b0ef5c1a00009c01ab1d3f.jpeg?ops=scalefit_600_noupscale

https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/56b0df6d1f00007f0021726e.jpeg?ops=scalefit_600_noupscale

https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/56b0ef5c1f00000d01217291.jpeg?ops=scalefit_600_noupscale

https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/56b0df6d1a00002d00ab1d17.jpeg?ops=scalefit_600_noupscale

https://saboteur365.files.wordpress.com/2016/08/marvels-of-creation-and-science-isaac-newton.jpg?w=1400


btw, Collings up there?

Francis Sellers Collins (born April 14, 1950) is an American physician-geneticist noted for his discoveries of disease genes and his leadership of the Human Genome Project. He is director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in Bethesda, Maryland, United States.



But Phrodeau and Emperor Severus know best !!

https://media.giphy.com/media/Vmunw0k7q12Ks/giphy.gif
 
Last edited:
No. Scientist requires no prefix nor suffix. Science is about a methodology, Belief is not, and never can be a factor.

All Creation stories are about magic - nothing to do with science, however good the story.

Ask yourself this question Xfrodo - How is Christmas on the planets of MACSO647-JD? Answering that will create a few problems for you. ;)

Science requires evidence. The evidence doesn't support Darwinian Evolution, it DOES support Creation Science. Beliefs are formed from tge evidence. The Creation story is supported by the actual scientific evidence. God's power IS evident. For instance: It is scientifically impossible for matter and energy to exist, yet here it is. It defies science for it to even exist. That is one example. I don't believe life exists outside of the earth. No problem at all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top