Weak 48 of Disasterous Donalds Regime

JackLuis

Literotica Guru
Joined
Sep 21, 2008
Posts
21,881
Former Watergate prosecutor pours cold water on Trump hint he may pardon Flynn: ‘He’s in for a big surprise’

“What would be the practical legal consequences if Donald Trump were to pardon Michael Flynn” Reid asked Akerman.

“The practical consequences are that he wouldn’t be charged with a crime, but he’s already spilled his guts. He’s already told Mueller everything he knows,” Akerman replied. “In addition to that, his cooperation agreement requires him to also speak to local and state officials. So I guarantee you that Mueller has already had Flynn speaking to the attorney general of the state of New York’s people, who are doing this jointly with him. So that if somehow Mueller’s team was disbanded, and that group had to go, state attorney generals could simply step in here and use state crimes as opposed to federal crimes.”

After last Weaks disaster Trump starts off this weak with a flop!:)
 
‘White House can’t put together a sentence without lying’: CNN pundit says Mueller credibility drubs Trump

Political adviser Karine Jean-Pierre got in the last word with the Trump supporter with a biting assessment.

“You can’t forget that when Mueller became FBI director, he was appointed by a Republican. He was appointed to special counsel by a Republican. He is a Republican,” she stated. “This is not a partisan thing where Democrats are trying to take down the president. This is Mueller who has one of the best legal minds out there.”

“And honestly, if you’re looking at the White House versus Mueller, who are you going to believe?” she asked. “The White House can’t put together a sentence without lying.”

The truth is not partizan!:)
 
‘A reckless con man as president’: LA Times burns Trump to the ground in brutal editorial

Dorfman admitted that he is tired of hearing about investigations into Russian collusion in the 2016 election of President Donald Trump when the focus should be on how in the hell did American voters let his election happen.

“What is it, in our American soul that allowed the Russians to be successful?” he asked.

“Those were not Russians voting in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, handing the election to the Republican candidate by a bit more than 80,000 votes. They were American men and women,” Dorfman wrote. “As were the 62,984,825 others who decided that such a troublesome, inflammatory figure expressed their desires and dreams. Trump could be impeached or resign, or his policies could simply implode under the weight of their malice, divisiveness and mendacity, and the country would still be defined and pressed by the same conditions and dread that enabled his rise.”

Remember that the last election was not about electing the "Best" candidate, but the "Least Worse" and the American people, through the Electoral College process, picked DJT over HRC after having watched them for ~20 years in the spotlight.

If we must blame someone for this it should be the "party Establishments" who failed in selecting qualified principled people. The failure to do so has caused the electorate to loose faith in the process and refuse to vote in significant numbers.
 
Remember that the last election was not about electing the "Best" candidate, but the "Least Worse" and the American people, through the Electoral College process, picked DJT over HRC after having watched them for ~20 years in the spotlight.

If we must blame someone for this it should be the "party Establishments" who failed in selecting qualified principled people. The failure to do so has caused the electorate to loose faith in the process and refuse to vote in significant numbers.

I watched both of them for the twenty years, and I believe the Russians and Republicans together did a false issue (several issues) campaign against Hillary Clinton that was successful because the American voters, on a whole, are a flock of sheep easily influenced and indoctrinated by the electronic media. Do I agree with everything Hillary Clinton stood for? No. But it wasn't a case of least worse as the American electorate was fed and feasted on. She's quite good enough and more than quite well enough prepared to function in the office of U.S. President. Those who think she's "least worse" are just gullible.
 
I watched both of them for the twenty years, and I believe the Russians and Republicans together did a false issue (several issues) campaign against Hillary Clinton that was successful because the American voters, on a whole, are a flock of sheep easily influenced and indoctrinated by the electronic media. Do I agree with everything Hillary Clinton stood for? No. But it wasn't a case of least worse as the American electorate was fed and feasted on. She's quite good enough and more than quite well enough prepared to function in the office of U.S. President. Those who think she's "least worse" are just gullible.



Considering what chaos the world is in on a regular basis someone who claims to have worked for the CIA saying they have a handle on the situation doesn't mean a whole hell of a lot. Hilary is just another ruthless Democrat that is happy to give the deep state all the toys and funding they need to keep her looking good.
 
DISASTROUS!!!

LOL.....that's almost as funny as the claims of the great Apocalypse if Net Neutrality were repealed.


What's next? .....Donald eats grilled cheese so DOOMSDAY!!!!!???
 
I watched both of them for the twenty years, and I believe the Russians and Republicans together did a false issue (several issues) campaign against Hillary Clinton that was successful because the American voters, on a whole, are a flock of sheep easily influenced and indoctrinated by the electronic media. Do I agree with everything Hillary Clinton stood for? No. But it wasn't a case of least worse as the American electorate was fed and feasted on. She's quite good enough and more than quite well enough prepared to function in the office of U.S. President. Those who think she's "least worse" are just gullible.

Choke on that (D)ick a little harder buddy.....LOL
 
Considering what chaos the world is in on a regular basis someone who claims to have worked for the CIA saying they have a handle on the situation doesn't mean a whole hell of a lot. Hilary is just another ruthless Democrat that is happy to give the deep state all the toys and funding they need to keep her looking good.
You are making a strong case for getting rid of the office of the Presidency altogether.
 
Well, if you can't trust the office to Democrats or idiots, who's left?
Robots. But they're not immortal. Back in the day, the Firesign Theatre did a bit on a robo-prez who was mishandled. "Hey man, you broke the president!" Might be best to have a presidential droid-type shell with a succession of midgets inside.

Or just go fully Disney animatronic. Walt Disney's worm-like third clone could be installed at the controls. The nation has gone pretty fucking Goofy anyway so nobody will notice.
 
Robots. But they're not immortal. Back in the day, the Firesign Theatre did a bit on a robo-prez who was mishandled. "Hey man, you broke the president!" Might be best to have a presidential droid-type shell with a succession of midgets inside.

Or just go fully Disney animatronic. Walt Disney's worm-like third clone could be installed at the controls. The nation has gone pretty fucking Goofy anyway so nobody will notice.
Someone should ask the White House, "why does the porridge bird lay its egg in the air?"
 
Someone should ask the White House, "why does the porridge bird lay its egg in the air?"
Responding to the question, Miz Huckabee Sanders will spend fifteen minutes blaming Obama, Clintons, Podesta, Franken, global warming conspirators, Apache shamans, and the NFL.
 
Trump is removing climate change from the national security threat list.

It will join Saudi Arabia and Russia as items that are not deemed worthy of attention by our national security agencies.

Meanwhile, Lt. Gen. HR McMaster is only working part-time as the NSA.
 
Trump is removing climate change from the national security threat list.

It will join Saudi Arabia and Russia as items that are not deemed worthy of attention by our national security agencies.

Meanwhile, Lt. Gen. HR McMaster is only working part-time as the NSA.

Because it doesn't belong there.....what "climate change" security threat do you think needs attention?

How do you expect our security agencies to hand that "threat"??

Yea....exactly.

It never belonged there in the first place because it was "feel good" virtue signaling with no real meaning other than to get the Prius drivers wet in their panties.
 
Because it doesn't belong there.....what "climate change" security threat do you think needs attention?

How do you expect our security agencies to hand that "threat"??

Yea....exactly.

It never belonged there in the first place because it was "feel good" virtue signaling with no real meaning other than to get the Prius drivers wet in their panties.
http://archive.defense.gov/pubs/150...n-national-implications-of-climate-change.pdf

Read it if you really want an answer. Otherwise stay uninformed and fuck off.
 
http://archive.defense.gov/pubs/150...n-national-implications-of-climate-change.pdf

Read it if you really want an answer. Otherwise stay uninformed and fuck off.
Summary:
"Climate change is an urgent and growing threat to our national security, contributing to increased natural disasters, refugee flows, and conflicts over basic resources such as food and water. These impacts are already occurring, and the scope, scale, and intensity of these impacts are projected to increase over time."
But climate change is all a Chinese plot! And there is no gravity, only a few competing THEORIES of gravity! And Earth is flat! I heard it on Alex Jones so it must be true! [/me examines Stupid Pills] I want more of these!
 
Here is how to explain to your Republican uncle why the Trump-GOP tax plan is a disgrace

Here are the 3 main Republican arguments in favor of the Republican tax plan, followed by the truth.

1. It will make American corporations competitive with foreign corporations, which are taxed at a lower rate.

Rubbish.

2. With the tax cut, big corporations and the rich will invest and create more jobs.

Baloney.

3. It will give small businesses an incentive to invest and create more jobs.

Untrue.

Read the article to get the truth about the Rethuglican bullshit!
 
Prominent conservatives shred Trump: Only ‘checks and balances’ have kept him from becoming ‘a dictator’


In a far-reaching interview with Politico, two long time conservatives who opposed not only the election of President Donald Trump, but his nomination, stated that he has been worse than expected and he would likely have ascended to dictator status were it not for American “checks and balances.”

According to both conservative Foreign Policy columnist Max Boot and ex-Condoleezza Rice adviser Eliot Cohen, Trump is “incredibly erratic and unpredictable,” and has put the country at more risk since being elected.

Boot admitted that, “some of the worst-case scenarios that we imagined have yet, mercifully, come to pass,” with Cohen chiming in to say, “It’s true, they haven’t started World War III yet … That’s a pretty low bar.”
 
“It’s true, they haven’t started World War III yet … That’s a pretty low bar.”
That comes in a week or two, after Tromp finds he can't fire Mueller. Tromp is going down. Will he take the world with him? Will the military follow suicide orders? How will the coup be announced?
 
Alex Jones’ ‘gut’ tells him the FBI will make an ‘assassination attempt’ on Trump’s life in the next 30 days

:eek: Alex's gut tells him in loud terms?

InfoWars host Alex Jones predicts that the only possible outcome of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russia’s election interference and potential collusion with the Trump campaign is a Justice Department coup.

“We have caught them in a gigantic, arrogant, foaming at the mouth, arrogance-fueled, rabid dog, reckless, naked, bold, ridiculous fraud, run by — it looks like — maybe 15 people in the Justice Department and the FBI,” Jones said, echoing right-wing talking points about corruption within the DOJ and Mueller’s team.

“I think they​’​re going to go ahead and make the​ir​ move to kill the president.​ I think in the next ​30​ days, I think they’re going to make an assassination attempt,” the host continued in the clip posted by Media Matters. “I just — my gut — I see all of them together, they’re that desperate.”

:rolleyes:
 
Trump Family’s Votes Weren’t Counted in New York Mayoral Election Because They All Fucked Up

The New York Daily News has reported that due to errors on their absentee ballots, the votes of Melania Trump, Ivanka Trump, and Jared Kushner didn't count.
First Lady Melania Trump, Ivanka Trump, and her husband (and presidential adviser) Jared Kushner applied to file absentee ballots in New York’s mayoral election on 7 November 2017, but their votes weren’t counted because of mistakes they made when filing, the New York Daily News has reported.

Citing officials at the New York City Board of Elections (BOE), the report said Melania Trump failed to sign the envelope containing her ballot as required, Ivanka Trump mailed in her ballot too late to be counted (per the instructions on the ballot application, it must be mailed no later than the seventh day before the election), and Jared Kushner never mailed his at all. Each of these errors is sufficient to render a ballot invalid, a Board of Elections official told the Daily News.

BOE spokeswoman Valerie Vasquez confirmed to NBC News on 12 December that Melania and Ivanka Trump’s ballots were “invalid and not counted.”

President Trump, who also voted by absentee ballot, properly signed the envelope and mailed it on time, but listed the wrong birthdate (July 14, 1946 instead of June 14), the Daily News said. It remains unclear whether this prevented Trump’s vote from being counted.
What to say about this? Most rights listed in the Constitution concern voting rights, and these toffs don't even know how to vote. Sad. Pathetic. Indicative.
 
DoD Releases Report on Security Implications of Climate Change


National Security Implications of Climate-Related Risks (PDF)

Because it doesn't belong there.....what "climate change" security threat do you think needs attention?

How do you expect our security agencies to hand that "threat"??

Yea....exactly.

It never belonged there in the first place because it was "feel good" virtue signaling with no real meaning other than to get the Prius drivers wet in their panties.
 
Back
Top