JAN132017: What was the Obama State Dept's Public View on Flynn/Trump "collusion"

Unabatable

Loves Spam
Joined
Nov 11, 2017
Posts
264
JAN132017: What was the Obama State Dept's Public View on Flynn/Trump "collusion"

Remember, first of all: there exists no criminal charge of "collusion" that can possibly be applied to this entire situation; ie, every time you read/hear anyone cite "collusion" as having any legal/criminal bearing whatsoever regarding Trump or anyone on his transition team and Russia, they're either intentionally or ignorantly lying.

That is not any wannabe opinion - it is pure legal fact.

The link below on the US State Dept website presents then-Deputy Spokesperson Mark Toner giving the Daily Press Briefing on January 13, 2017 - just 8 days before the Tool was inaugurated as POTUS.

Retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn was serving as Trump's-designated National Security Adviser at this time; a reporter asks Toner the State Dept's view on Flynn's then just-publicized meeting with the Russian Ambassador; click all the way ahead to the 27:35 to experience how "collusion" is actually viewed in reality, and remember this was at the very start of what has now become the prototypical something out of absolutely nothing:

https://video.state.gov/detail/videos/category/video/5281263174001/?autoStart=true
 
There have been lots of liars caught out lately. A good number of them lied about those supposedly legal Russian contacts.
 
Remember, first of all: there exists no criminal charge of "collusion" that can possibly be applied to this entire situation; ie, every time you read/hear anyone cite "collusion" as having any legal/criminal bearing whatsoever regarding Trump or anyone on his transition team and Russia, they're either intentionally or ignorantly lying.

That is not any wannabe opinion - it is pure legal fact.

The link below on the US State Dept website presents then-Deputy Spokesperson Mark Toner giving the Daily Press Briefing on January 13, 2017 - just 8 days before the Tool was inaugurated as POTUS.

Retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn was serving as Trump's-designated National Security Adviser at this time; a reporter asks Toner the State Dept's view on Flynn's then just-publicized meeting with the Russian Ambassador; click all the way ahead to the 27:35 to experience how "collusion" is actually viewed in reality, and remember this was at the very start of what has now become the prototypical something out of absolutely nothing:

https://video.state.gov/detail/videos/category/video/5281263174001/?autoStart=true

attachment.php
 
Remember, first of all: there exists no criminal charge of "collusion" that can possibly be applied to this entire situation; ie, every time you read/hear anyone cite "collusion" as having any legal/criminal bearing whatsoever regarding Trump or anyone on his transition team and Russia, they're either intentionally or ignorantly lying.

That is not any wannabe opinion - it is pure legal fact.

The link below on the US State Dept website presents then-Deputy Spokesperson Mark Toner giving the Daily Press Briefing on January 13, 2017 - just 8 days before the Tool was inaugurated as POTUS.

Retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn was serving as Trump's-designated National Security Adviser at this time; a reporter asks Toner the State Dept's view on Flynn's then just-publicized meeting with the Russian Ambassador; click all the way ahead to the 27:35 to experience how "collusion" is actually viewed in reality, and remember this was at the very start of what has now become the prototypical something out of absolutely nothing:

https://video.state.gov/detail/videos/category/video/5281263174001/?autoStart=true
They created the fake narrative and that's their position on it!
Shame they didn't seem to worried about Hillary's well documented security violation's, Russian dealings and failure to do her job.

But in all fairness to the Leftwing god Obama he was busy shipping in illegals,selling weapons to terrorist, trading captured killers for a cowardly traitor to come home and leaving American's to be killed over seas in a war zone he created.
But hey hows that FREE Obamacare working out for you ?
 
But hey hows that FREE Obamacare working out for you ?
How's your health insurance now?

How was it before ACA banned insurers from skimming 1/5 of your premiums?

How will it be when you're over 60, if you live so long?

How will it be for your descendants, if any?

Do you feel lucky?

BTW Obamacare was Romneycare, the Gup alternative to Hillary's universal coverage system. Gups loved it when it bore Romney's name. Then it became a Dum program and Gups hated it, starved it, broke oaths in order to kill it. Sad.
 
They created the fake narrative and that's their position on it!
Shame they didn't seem to worried about Hillary's well documented security violation's, Russian dealings and failure to do her job.

But in all fairness to the Leftwing god Obama he was busy shipping in illegals,selling weapons to terrorist, trading captured killers for a cowardly traitor to come home and leaving American's to be killed over seas in a war zone he created.
But hey hows that FREE Obamacare working out for you ?

Shipping in illegals? Lie. More people were deported under Obama than under Bush.

Selling weapons to terrorists? Um, every administration has been doing this for at least the past 50 years. Iran-Contra mean anything?

Trading . . . to come home. The U.S. doesn't leave it's soldiers behind, remember?

American's to be killed over seas in a war zone he created. Yes, I can see how Bush's invasion of Iraq for no purpose while allowing Osama Bin Laden, the man who organized the worst terrorist attack in U.S. history, to get away could be construed as Obama's fault. How many soldiers did Bush send to their deaths in Iraq? How many trillions were added to the national debt because of Bush's foray into Iraq?
 
Back
Top