Don't feel lonely, socialist GB "Free Speech" haters...

[Unabatable]

"...the world’s largest professional press freedom association devoted exclusively to advocating on behalf of broadcast and digital journalists" is right there with you on your Orwellian doublespeak disingenuousness.

Ironic, isn't it, the treasonous - yet cowardly - assaulting power socialism has against fundamentally liberal political principles?

No more exists in the socialist/progressive/Democrat political toolbox: I totally despise what you say, but will defend with my life your natural right to say it, yet all the wannabe communists don't have even an ounce of honest nut to simply admit it - they gotta pretend to still support "Free Speech", lest their tyrannical fraud is fully exposed.

The GB pimps "Free Speech", yet its speech is not only fully regulated, all its speech is partisanly censored, too.

Just like some bullshit "professional press freedom association" that pimps "press freedom" for itself but, in reality, is totally against "Free Speech" of others that it, too, deems not partisanly acceptable at all:

Walmart.com yanks t-shirt about lynching journalists, made by controversy-steeped Teespring

SAN FRANCISCO — Custom T-shirt design company Teespring is once again on the defensive after a media group found it was selling a T-shirt about lynching journalists on its site and as a third party seller on Walmart.com.

https://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/16d77ea49638808bf1630d06fa7db0647421d1dd/c=6-0-892-666&r=x404&c=534x401/local/-/media/2017/11/30/USATODAY/USATODAY/636476538836645187-Screen-Shot-2017-11-30-at-12.49.18-PM.jpg

https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech...made-controversy-steeped-teespring/910197001/

It's a friggin' TShirt, ffs!

Fact of the historical matter is the "Free Speech" outlawed above and the "Free Speech" not partisanly allowed on this "Free Speech" fraud website doesn't amount to an ant fart of the offending speech that took place in the wild west political era of this nation's founding. Yet, the powers that were at the time wisely won the argument, anyway, that that viciously offending speech was exactly what needed to be FULLY GUARANTEED and PROTECTED if actual free speech was truly to be allowed at all.

False advertising, socialist-owned websites on the free and open Internet, pimping "Free Speech", and "professional press freedom association" socialist groups who demand "Free Speech" not actually be allowed.

It's so funny when their statist tribal supporters defend them by ridiculously offering that these champions of "Free Speech" cannot allow some speech because it'll get them in trouble with the law...

...when it's these haters of true free speech who're actually, actively turning the law fully against Amendment I totally because they do not genuinely support the actual concept of political free speech at all.

Fucking traitors.

 

[jaF0]

Huh?

What y'all on about?

 

[oggbashan]

Huh?

What y'all on about?

I think Eeyore wants to be banned again to prove what a fearless warrior he is.

 

[phrodeau]

Huh?

What y'all on about?

Something about Wal-Mart being unconstitutional because they sell Bibles.

 

[jaF0]

Figured somebody had been sniffing diesel exhaust fumes or something.

 

[Unabatable]

I think Eeyore wants to be banned again to prove what a fearless warrior he is.

Exactly, fraud.

It's beautiful having threads/posts covertly wiped that violate not a single word of a single Forum Guideline at all, and/or having them censored with a totally bogus warning reason in their place, or being instantly banned for posting nothing different than what scores of progressive posters like you are freely allowed to post with not even a word of warning at all.

Almost as beautiful as a socialist like you championing banning any poster because you simply don't like what they post when it, too, breaks not a single rule under Forum Guidelines at all.



Another banning without legitimate cause will only prove more that the GB is ruled not by objective law which applies equally to all, but totally by subjective feeling in regards to how the specific poster is biasedly viewed.

BTW: did you read yesterday when progressive poster neci blatantly told another poster exactly, graphically how she'd violently and viciously physically assault that poster, but even a day after her clear Forum Guideline and allegedly intolerable violation, not even a word of warning to her at all?

You know what? Being a true champion of free speech, I don't have any issue at all with any WORDS neci or any other GBer may sling, because I naturally discern WORDS aren't ACTIONS and the objective intolerable line is precisely, unwavering between the two. And it's not about neci personally, either...

It's about how a specific poster is subjectively viewed on this site that determines their partisan governance; that's why some posters can post even worse violations and never be even warned at all, while other posters are instantly banned for not violating any rule at all...

...simply because 100-year old socialist twatwads like you haven't matured enough to even comprehend the words "objective tolerance", let alone be adult enough to actually practice it.

No?

Then why do you exalt my banning for not breaking a single Forum Guideline at all?

Why are you such a pathetic enemy of free speech?

 

[richard_daily]

So capitalism banned a t-shirt, and somehow it's socialism's fault?

Uhhhh, ok...

 

[phrodeau]

(edited)
Then why do you exalt my banning for not breaking a single Forum Guideline at all?

Hang on a second. You were banned from this site?

Then what the fuck are you doing here?

 

[Wats_butthole]

What a whiny cunt. We all know it's not free speech 100%. Now shut the fuck up and take a nap or whatever it is you old whiny fucks do after a meltdown.

 

[snugglestruggle]

Eyer , you know dam well the GB is more like a "tolerated speech zone" and you made the most of it lol.

 

[Richard_P_Feynman]

A private corporation outlawed free speech by voluntarily taking a plausibly offensive product off its shelves? How exactly does that work again...?

 

[Unabatable]

To be clear:

Years ago I first foretold of GB progressives - those who love to fantasizingly self-pimp that they are the prime champions of tolerance, equality, justice, open-mindedness - being the very ones who would eventually be wholly responsible for "Free Speech" diminishing on the unmoderated GB to the point of its outright regulation on the GB. Back then, I warned that the progressive klan here would eventually make the GB less "Free Speech" than even totally moderated Twitter was then.

Guess what?

The GB has lowered itself to a level far more intolerant of free speech than even socialist Twitter today, while the GB has incorporated an equal degree of total partisan intolerance of the speech that is so infamously practiced on Twitter, too.

So?



It is, indeed, progressives/socialists who are the very ones who are executing "Free Speech" word by word, insisting now that only "Speech" they subjectively approve of be allowed, no matter if none of those words violate any "rules" that - they pimp out of the other side of their naturally lying mouths - everyone is subject to equally.

I once fingertipped an abortion OP on this Board; it was erased and I was banned very quickly after it was posted...the explanation listed threatening others as cause.

But that was an unarguable, outright lie: the post threatened no one in the least at all. When unabatably pushed on that fact, the banner effortlessly admitted that it was erased simply because so many complained about the post - not because it violated a single Forum Guideline.

An outright lie as "justification", simply so not to be honest up front about how utterly anti-"Free Speech" the GB has become.

I've posted at least a half a dozen censored images on this Board - not a single one of them violate a single Forum Guideline. Yet they've been erased and I've been instantly banned for posting them, anyway - for NO OTHER REASON than others didn't like them...

...which I can fully understand: why would baby killers and/or their champions actually want to be shown the REAL LIFE results of their actions. Seems to me if they're actually right about those poor, little tortuously murdered babies not being human life at all, they wouldn't care either about their inhuman death photos. Yet, they seem to get really angry when they see images of their own doing, and then run demanding a higher power, politically sympathetic to their baby killing cause, save them - by TOTAL PARTISAN CENSORSHIP - from being bothered with REAL LIFE evidence of what they do.



It's just really hilarious to me that in one thread a baby killer can be sharing how gloriously hot it is to get ravagingly boned up the butthole...

...and then in another thread be so outrageously offended that she must run to socialist mommy moderator to have such utter intolerableness wiped from her eyes for her.

I remember a GB where virtually all speech was allowed by EVERYBODY, no matter their politics. Verboten stuff now was freely allowed on the Board then. No Forum Guidelines have changed since then; no new Forum Guidelines have been implemented since then, either. THE ONLY thing that's changed is the more and more subjectively partisan way "Free Speech" is ALLOWED to be exercised here: freely for some, bannable for others.

So, now is the time again for all the usual truly anti-"Free Speech" GB progressives to tell me their progressive pal can run the GB however she wants, that if I don't like how their progressive pal partisanly rules over her pimped-"Free Speech" site, I can leave...

...which, simply more proves the point I've now no doubt firmly established as honestly unarguable FACT.

And even more so still if I get banned again now - as anti-"Free Speech" progressives wish - for AGAIN posting not a single world that violates Forum Guidelines to any degree.

Why do progressives abhor "Free Speech" so much?

 

[richard_daily]

To be clear:

Years ago I first foretold of GB progressives - those who love to fantasizingly self-pimp that they are the prime champions of tolerance, equality, justice, open-mindedness - being the very ones who would eventually be wholly responsible for "Free Speech" diminishing on the unmoderated GB to the point of its outright regulation on the GB. Back then, I warned that the progressive klan here would eventually make the GB less "Free Speech" than even totally moderated Twitter was then.

Guess what?

The GB has lowered itself to a level far more intolerant of free speech than even socialist Twitter today, while the GB has incorporated an equal degree of total partisan intolerance of the speech that is so infamously practiced on Twitter, too.

So?



It is, indeed, progressives/socialists who are the very ones who are executing "Free Speech" word by word, insisting now that only "Speech" they subjectively approve of be allowed, no matter if none of those words violate any "rules" that - they pimp out of the other side of their naturally lying mouths - everyone is subject to equally.

I once fingertipped an abortion OP on this Board; it was erased and I was banned very quickly after it was posted...the explanation listed threatening others as cause.

But that was an unarguable, outright lie: the post threatened no one in the least at all. When unabatably pushed on that fact, the banner effortlessly admitted that it was erased simply because so many complained about the post - not because it violated a single Forum Guideline.

An outright lie as "justification", simply so not to be honest up front about how utterly anti-"Free Speech" the GB has become.

I've posted at least a half a dozen censored images on this Board - not a single one of them violate a single Forum Guideline. Yet they've been erased and I've been instantly banned for posting them, anyway - for NO OTHER REASON than others didn't like them...

...which I can fully understand: why would baby killers and/or their champions actually want to be shown the REAL LIFE results of their actions. Seems to me if they're actually right about those poor, little tortuously murdered babies not being human life at all, they wouldn't care either about their inhuman death photos. Yet, they seem to get really angry when they see images of their own doing, and then run demanding a higher power, politically sympathetic to their baby killing cause, save them - by TOTAL PARTISAN CENSORSHIP - from being bothered with REAL LIFE evidence of what they do.



It's just really hilarious to me that in one thread a baby killer can be sharing how gloriously hot it is to get ravagingly boned up the butthole...

...and then in another thread be so outrageously offended that she must run to socialist mommy moderator to have such utter intolerableness wiped from her eyes for her.

I remember a GB where virtually all speech was allowed by EVERYBODY, no matter their politics. Verboten stuff now was freely allowed on the Board then. No Forum Guidelines have changed since then; no new Forum Guidelines have been implemented since then, either. THE ONLY thing that's changed is the more and more subjectively partisan way "Free Speech" is ALLOWED to be exercised here: freely for some, bannable for others.

So, now is the time again for all the usual truly anti-"Free Speech" GB progressives to tell me their progressive pal can run the GB however she wants, that if I don't like how their progressive pal partisanly rules over her pimped-"Free Speech" site, I can leave...

...which, simply more proves the point I've now no doubt firmly established as honestly unarguable FACT.

And even more so still if I get banned again now - as anti-"Free Speech" progressives wish - for AGAIN posting not a single world that violates Forum Guidelines to any degree.

Why do progressives abhor "Free Speech" so much?

Eeyore...

America's next mass shooter.

 

[jaF0]

To be clear:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Amet consectetur adipiscing elit duis tristique. Nunc id cursus metus aliquam eleifend mi in nulla posuere. Laoreet non curabitur gravida arcu ac. Dignissim sodales ut eu sem integer vitae justo. Libero enim sed faucibus turpis in eu. Scelerisque fermentum dui faucibus in ornare quam viverra orci. Vestibulum rhoncus est pellentesque elit ullamcorper dignissim. Non sodales neque sodales ut etiam sit. Mauris ...

You call that CLEAR?????

 

[spacekowboy]

So which one is this assclown?

 

[Unabatable]

A private corporation outlawed free speech by voluntarily taking a plausibly offensive product off its shelves? How exactly does that work again...?

It works exactly as it does here...

Someone who proclaims how much they champion "Free Speech" is self-offended by actual free speech, and then runs to a higher power to get that actual free speech quashed.

Additionally, also exactly like here, I suspect that, considering how many other free speech examples the progressively-deemed offender produces, the anti-"Free Speech" owner will ban them from practicing their actual free speech at their site(s) totally.

Now, how 'bout your socialistsplaining how any poster who proclaims to revere actual free speech gets so self-offended by it that they insist it be quashed - you know, exactly like this poser organization who pimps they revere freedom of the press demands actual free speech be quashed?

That's right: it brings us ALL right back to the true meat of the matter:

Socialists only pimp "Free Speech", because when it comes down to actually revering it, they naturally choose to quash it, instead.

No different than pigs using "lipstick" to pimp themselves up, too, but when reality time comes due...

Everyone just sees them as exactly what they are, too.

 

[Unabatable]

Eyer , you know dam well the GB is more like a "tolerated speech zone" and you made the most of it lol.

Yes, I believe my unabatable efforts have made that quite clear by now.

So, why is "Free Speech" still pimped up there in the right hand corner of the page?



BRING IT DOWN!



https://imghaven.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/otlogo.png



BTW: does a "tolerated free speech zone" look something like this:

https://imghaven.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/naziliterotica.jpg​

 

[jaF0]

Give it up BusyBody.

 

[Unabatable]

Eeyore...

America's next mass shooter.

Sorry, dickly: even though I abode on literal desert no-man's land, where even the great Comanche could not make home, right on the border where coyote paths and illegal traffic interweave like perfectly-cooked spaghetti, the only "weapon" I freely choose to keep and bear, as an individual who fully understands there is absolutely no justifiable reason whatsoever for offensive physical assault upon another human being...

...is an ancient, wooden, 32" Louisville Slugger.

https://www.kalamazooflag.com/mm5/graphics/00000001/us-come-and-take-it-flag_540x360.jpg

 

[richard_daily]

Sorry, dickly: even though I abode on literal desert no-man's land, where even the great Comanche could not make home, right on the border where coyote paths and illegal traffic interweave like perfectly-cooked spaghetti, the only "weapon" I freely choose to keep and bear, as an individual who fully understands there is absolutely no justifiable reason whatsoever for offensive physical assault upon another human being...

...is an ancient, wooden, 32" Louisville Slugger.

https://www.kalamazooflag.com/mm5/graphics/00000001/us-come-and-take-it-flag_540x360.jpg

Sorry that you're too broke for firearms... but we're all probably better off for it.

You're a loose nut.

 

[Unabatable]

Sorry that you're too broke for firearms... but we're all probably better off for it.

You're a loose nut.

From your pay grade, wannabe...

...you can't even begin to imagine.

 

[Hypoxia]

Use of the null word 'socialist' renders the OPs comments meaningless gibberish.

This troll has been adequately fed.

Move on.

 

[BotanyBoy]

So capitalism banned a t-shirt, and somehow it's socialism's fault?

Uhhhh, ok...

Capitalism doesn't ban anything.....only government, the authority of the collective, the left does that.

Use of the null word 'socialist' renders the OPs comments meaningless gibberish.

This troll has been adequately fed.

Move on.

It's not a null word....unless you're a leftist trying to hide the fact that you're not actually liberal, but actually advocate government ownership over the means of production and control of the distribution of goods and services.

 

[Unabatable]

...you have plenty of racist, "Free Speech"-hating company at Evergreen State:

Evergreen State’s student newspaper includes no-whites-allowed opinion section

The student newspaper at Evergreen State College has a section in its opinion pages described as “for people of color by people of color.”

“This should be a place where we can be us without it being overshadowed by the dark cloud that is living under white supremacy and having to see things from a white perspective. This is why when we do cover these issues it will be in the context and from the perspective of POC and POC only,” according to the section’s editors as they reintroduced it to readers in September.

https://www.thecollegefix.com/post/39514/

Isn't it swell that a College which partakes of federal government funding is permitted to so blatantly violate Amendment I freedom of the press, while federal government judges regularly rule state schools which use no federal government funding have no Amendment I freedom of religion at all?

 

[colddiesel]

Then why do you exalt my banning ?

1. Because you are an asshole without a sphincter, you spew shit continuously and uncontrolably.

2. Because it's the site owners incontovertable capitalist right to ban any stupid sod she pleases.