Sexual Assault

[dontbackdown]

It seems to be the all the rage these days. So much so that one doesn't know quite what to believe.

Over the years, here on this board, I have witnessed so many women, and the men that want to suck up, jump to the 'guilty' conclusion at first allegation only to be proven bullshit later. These were high profile cases pumped by the press. The GA truck drive, Kobe Bryant, the NC Lacrosse team. The list goes on.

The problem is that I'm certain that many claims are true, I'm just not inclined to rush to verdict.

The longer the time span between event and accusation, the less inclined I am to sympathize with the accuser. Even more so when the individual accused is someone of wealth (power is implied there). My thoughts begin to sway on the side of the accuser when the accused has paid out multiple times in the past. Who is so stupid as to put themselves in a compromising position time after time?

There was a study done some time ago (I posted the link way back when) done by the FBI that concluded that up to 20% of all rape claims were false. I don't think it's that high, but even the rape victim advocates admit that the number may be as high as 10%. I haven't seen any credible, impartial, study concerning sexual assault. And concerning that subject, sexual assault, just what is that legally? From my reading the definition varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. And further, without any forensic evidence it comes down to 'one says this, the other that' (clearly sexual assault and/or rape is NOT restricted to heterosexual individuals).

Getting to the point, I see this flood of sexual misbehavior/assault/rape accusations in the press and I can't help but wonder how many of the accusers are just jumping on a bandwagon?

 

[daimoniotica]

It seems to be the all the rage these days. So much so that one doesn't know quite what to believe.

Over the years, here on this board, I have witnessed so many women, and the men that want to suck up, jump to the 'guilty' conclusion at first allegation only to be proven bullshit later. These were high profile cases pumped by the press. The GA truck drive, Kobe Bryant, the NC Lacrosse team. The list goes on.

The problem is that I'm certain that many claims are true, I'm just not inclined to rush to verdict.

The longer the time span between event and accusation, the less inclined I am to sympathize with the accuser. Even more so when the individual accused is someone of wealth (power is implied there). My thoughts begin to sway on the side of the accuser when the accused has paid out multiple times in the past. Who is so stupid as to put themselves in a compromising position time after time?

There was a study done some time ago (I posted the link way back when) done by the FBI that concluded that up to 20% of all rape claims were false. I don't think it's that high, but even the rape victim advocates admit that the number may be as high as 10%. I haven't seen any credible, impartial, study concerning sexual assault. And concerning that subject, sexual assault, just what is that legally? From my reading the definition varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. And further, without any forensic evidence it comes down to 'one says this, the other that' (clearly sexual assault and/or rape is NOT restricted to heterosexual individuals).

Getting to the point, I see this flood of sexual misbehavior/assault/rape accusations in the press and I can't help but wonder how many of the accusers are just jumping on a bandwagon?

I've never met a single person in my life I wanted to sexually assault.

 

[dontbackdown]

I've never met a single person in my life I wanted to sexually assault.

Therein lies the problem, did you sexually assault them in THEIR mind? Sexual assault seems to be more in the mind of the 'assaulted' than in the mind of the assaulter.

That is not to say that sexual assault is a myth, merely that in so many cases it's subjective.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

I've never met a single person in my life I wanted to sexually assault.

That's because you never leave your parents' basement.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Alabama State Auditor Jim Zeigler said he didn’t understand why there was such a fuss about Moore adding, “Also take Joseph and Mary. Mary was a teenager and Joseph was an adult carpenter. They became parents of Jesus.”

 

[AngusBridie]

Interesting conclusions .. I️ guess the only real way to know is to do some real field study yourself.. like. Maybe sit with accusers and label them like tornadoes.. based on your experience honey was that like a f1 or a full blown f5. I️ don’t mean to question your ability to quantify the Fujitsu scale but perhaps your blowing thing out of proportion

 

[Disgustipated]

It seems to be the all the rage these days. So much so that one doesn't know quite what to believe.

Over the years, here on this board, I have witnessed so many women, and the men that want to suck up, jump to the 'guilty' conclusion at first allegation only to be proven bullshit later. These were high profile cases pumped by the press. The GA truck drive, Kobe Bryant, the NC Lacrosse team. The list goes on.

The problem is that I'm certain that many claims are true, I'm just not inclined to rush to verdict.

The longer the time span between event and accusation, the less inclined I am to sympathize with the accuser. Even more so when the individual accused is someone of wealth (power is implied there). My thoughts begin to sway on the side of the accuser when the accused has paid out multiple times in the past. Who is so stupid as to put themselves in a compromising position time after time?

There was a study done some time ago (I posted the link way back when) done by the FBI that concluded that up to 20% of all rape claims were false. I don't think it's that high, but even the rape victim advocates admit that the number may be as high as 10%. I haven't seen any credible, impartial, study concerning sexual assault. And concerning that subject, sexual assault, just what is that legally? From my reading the definition varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. And further, without any forensic evidence it comes down to 'one says this, the other that' (clearly sexual assault and/or rape is NOT restricted to heterosexual individuals).

Getting to the point, I see this flood of sexual misbehavior/assault/rape accusations in the press and I can't help but wonder how many of the accusers are just jumping on a bandwagon?

The GA truck drive? Kobe paid off the woman he raped. And don't you mean the Duke Lacross Team? Other than that, solid points

 

[AngusBridie]

I️ think the only way you can really draw your percentages and conclusions to real time data is by doing some time in county. Keep a notebook. With %s. Then rate your assault. Or lack thereof

 

[dontbackdown]

The GA truck drive? Kobe paid off the woman he raped. And don't you mean the Duke Lacross Team? Other than that, solid points

Duke, NC, you seem to have gotten the reference.

The GA truck driver was arrested for kidnapping/slavery/rape after being accused by a 'truck stop Judy.' The GB went ape shit agreeing that the SOB should be tortured to death. Turns out it was all bullshit.

Kobe's accuser ended up being thoroughly discredited in a court of law. He should have never written the check.

 

[Disgustipated]

Duke, NC, you seem to have gotten the reference.

The GA truck driver was arrested for kidnapping/slavery/rape after being accused by a 'truck stop Judy.' The GB went ape shit agreeing that the SOB should be tortured to death. Turns out it was all bullshit.

Kobe's accuser ended up being thoroughly discredited in a court of law. He should have never written the check.

It's hard to take a post seriously when you can't even get the school right. And I wouldn't have known had you not said "Lacross". Kobe is a rapist, just ask the rock he put on Vanessa's finger after the trial.

 

[dontbackdown]

It's hard to take a post seriously when you can't even get the school right. And I wouldn't have known had you not said "Lacross". Kobe is a rapist, just ask the rock he put on Vanessa's finger after the trial.

Fuck you Penis Gazer. You fully understood the reference, and you took it seriously. Address the subject or fuck off.

 

[AngusBridie]

I’m out


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=e8sI_nDq2kw

 

[daimoniotica]

[Discussions promoting and/or accusations involving pedophilia and/or child sex prohibited per our forum guidelines. - Last Warning Already Given]

 

[dontbackdown]

Along the lines of the subject;

Campus 'rape' tribunals

Interesting perspective.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

I find it interesting that a poster here, who's posted to another poster here exactly how he'd sexually assault that poster's daughter - and that she'd like it - is not only still allowed to freely post here, but is still accepted as a member in good standing by his fellow socialists/progressives here.

How can progressives possibly condemn others for what they themselves fully tolerate?

Really? Gosh.

If what you claim in this anecdote is gospel truth and not just saying sooth, I sure would feel mighty squicky going over their house for Thanksgiving this year, I must say.

Who is this poster? And more importantly, what exactly did this poster say? Can you repeat their words verbatim, for the purposes of clarification from an objective viewpoint?

 

[Dribble]

Just as a conservative poster here said "she deserved it" after a member of the press was raped?

What i find interesting is the fact that 1 out of 6 people know someone on #metoo. But yet there is no problem...

 

[dontbackdown]

Just as a conservative poster here said "she deserved it" after a member of the press was raped?

What i find interesting is the fact that 1 out of 6 people know someone on #metoo. But yet there is no problem...

1. Whoever posted "she deserved it" is NO conservative.

2. #metoo is NOT a credible survey.

 

[Disgustipated]

Fuck you Penis Gazer. You fully understood the reference, and you took it seriously. Address the subject or fuck off.

I find it interesting that a poster here, who's posted to another poster here exactly how he'd sexually assault that poster's daughter - and that she'd like it - is not only still allowed to freely post here, but is still accepted as a member in good standing by his fellow socialists/progressives here.

How can progressives possibly condemn others for what they themselves fully tolerate?

My work here is done

 

[Dribble]

1. Whoever posted "she deserved it" is NO conservative.

2. #metoo is NOT a credible survey.

Of course not....

 

[dontbackdown]

Really? Gosh.

If what you claim in this anecdote is gospel truth and not just saying sooth, I sure would feel mighty squicky going over their house for Thanksgiving this year, I must say.

Who is this poster? And more importantly, what exactly did this poster say? Can you repeat their words verbatim, for the purposes of clarification from an objective viewpoint?

Obviously you have selective blindness.

 

[Boxlicker101]

It's hard to take a post seriously when you can't even get the school right. And I wouldn't have known had you not said "Lacross". Kobe is a rapist, just ask the rock he put on Vanessa's finger after the trial.

The bogus accusation was against a lacrosse team in North Carolina, so the original post was not in error. And, at least it spelled "lacrosse" correctly.

 

[Boxlicker101]

It seems to be the all the rage these days. So much so that one doesn't know quite what to believe.

Over the years, here on this board, I have witnessed so many women, and the men that want to suck up, jump to the 'guilty' conclusion at first allegation only to be proven bullshit later. These were high profile cases pumped by the press. The GA truck drive, Kobe Bryant, the NC Lacrosse team. The list goes on.

The problem is that I'm certain that many claims are true, I'm just not inclined to rush to verdict.

The longer the time span between event and accusation, the less inclined I am to sympathize with the accuser. Even more so when the individual accused is someone of wealth (power is implied there). My thoughts begin to sway on the side of the accuser when the accused has paid out multiple times in the past. Who is so stupid as to put themselves in a compromising position time after time?

There was a study done some time ago (I posted the link way back when) done by the FBI that concluded that up to 20% of all rape claims were false. I don't think it's that high, but even the rape victim advocates admit that the number may be as high as 10%. I haven't seen any credible, impartial, study concerning sexual assault. And concerning that subject, sexual assault, just what is that legally? From my reading the definition varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. And further, without any forensic evidence it comes down to 'one says this, the other that' (clearly sexual assault and/or rape is NOT restricted to heterosexual individuals).

Getting to the point, I see this flood of sexual misbehavior/assault/rape accusations in the press and I can't help but wonder how many of the accusers are just jumping on a bandwagon?

You probably should have included Tawana Brawley.

 

[renard_ruse]

We're seeing the long term effort by the New World Order to destroy sex come into into final phases.

They started by getting rid of traditional sexual morals and promoting a free and promiscious lifestyle. In the 60s and 70s especially, loose morals were strongly encouraged. Women were told to be "liberated" they should be promiscious. Porn, sex ed, sex saturation on TV and movies, were all promoted. Young people in particular were encouraged to have lots of sex with lots of partners, and above all, never ever to wait until their wedding night to have sex like their ancestors.

Then the 90s and 2000s came around and the promisciuity became even crazier with homosexuality, bisexuality (especially female bisexuality), and all manner of perversion being mainstreamed and promoted.

Now, as planned, people are becoming sex'ed out. The mystery and romance of the act is gone. Even love is of little interest to young people, as shown by the lack of popularity of love songs and love stories in movies and TV. So much sex saturation for so long has made people ripe for the final phase of the NWO plan to destroy sex, love, marriage, and the family unit: ASEXUALITY and a return to a negative view of sex. However, this time it isn't just a negative view of sex outside of marriage, but evne within it.

By emphasizing the relatively rare "abusive" aspects of sexuality and ignoring the romantic, mysterious, life affirming aspects of it, they hope to finish off any remaining desire for sex among a population already grown weary and bored of it due to decades of oversaturation.

Interestingly, many utopian philosophies of the past also envisioned a sexless future. This is not "just happening." Its been planned all along. They will gradually stamp out sex or criminalize it entirely for the few who still want to do it.

Sound crazy? Notice how the gay movement, which was always a hyper sexual movement, is suddenly promoting "asexuality". Its the latest letter added to their alphabet soup. Gradually the other letters will drop off and all that will be left with be the A. Its happening and the sexual harrassment, all sex is abuse, hysteria is a part of it.

 

[toeskr]

Louis CK, way to go bro.... wait, that's a vanguard of the left, right?

Lol. Spin this bitches.

 

[Froya]

Louis CK, way to go bro.... wait, that's a vanguard of the left, right?

Lol. Spin this bitches.

There are assholes on both sides of the fence. Not really something anyone should be gleeful about, but to each his own, I guess.