Gun control ... actual question

While you're disingenuously, irrelevantly and statistly swooning over Switzerland, don't forget the ELEPHANT in that, your wannabe room:

Racial makeup of Switzerland:

so-called "White" = 94%

Other = 6%

Being interested =/= 'swooning'.

I'm not entirely sure what your point is.
 
I wasn't aware that Switzerland was socialist. They do a really good job of hiding that.


Maybe from a Marxist-Leninist perspective they do.

Like many lefties that far left they think until the government hangs a "Department of _________ for the Democratic Republic of ________ " sign on the door of everything it's totally capitalism which is exactly what anything other than the utopia Marx predicted is.

But to a freedom loving M'arican liberal capitalist.......they along with most of Europe might be whatever special flavor of diet socialist they want to BuuuShit about, but socialist enough to still be socialist. :cool:


IDK if you fall into that category of lefty, but from all I've gathered it sounds like a possibility you might be way out on the left field boundary lines somewhere trying to climb up and over the back wall.
 
Last edited:
Maybe from a Marxist-Leninist perspective they do.

Like many lefties that far left they think until the government hangs a "Department of _________ for the Democratic Republic of ________ " sign on the door it's totally capitalism which is exactly what anything other than the utopia Marx predicted is.

But to a freedom loving M'arican liberal capitalist.......they along with most of Europe might be whatever special flavor of diet socialist they want to BuuuShit about, but socialist enough to still be socialist. :cool:


IDK if you fall into that category of lefty, but from all I've gathered it sounds like a possibility you might be way out on the left field boundary lines somewhere trying to climb up and over the back wall.

Ok ... I've totally ceased to understand either your point or it's relevance.
 
Ok ... I've totally ceased to understand either your point or it's relevance.

There is none.

I'm just talking shit because I got nothing better to do until either a new hydraulic hose for the hoe shows up or my pine/maple seeds get here.

Besides, does anything on this board (or otherwise really) actually matter?

No....so smoke em' if you got em'.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CUegDHbVEAARna3.png
 
There is none.

I'm just talking shit because I got nothing better to do until either a new hydraulic hose for the hoe shows up or my pine/maple seeds get here.

I hate it when that happens, then your hoe doesn't lubricate properly and chafing occurs.
 
I think out of all of the stats there, that's the most important one. Of course, others may have other opinions, but based on that stat, it doesn't seem like the US HAS a gun problem.

I think the manufactured outrage serves a purpose, and the purpose isn't to grant more freedoms or civil liberties.

Much as I would like to agree, that doesn't make a good metric. Americans for sure have more than one gun per person. Possibly as much as one and a half guns per person. it's hard to say how many households actually have guns because of course no one that illegally has guns reports on surveys of such and anybody with any common sense doesn't tell anyone over the phone yes I have a gun in the house would you like to come steal it?

Most estimates is ownership is somewhere around a third of American households I would guess it's probably closer to a half but for the sake of discussion lets go with the third. That would mean all of those figures that you're looking at represent households with three guns a piece or more. I would guess with notable exceptions such as the vegas shooter people with large numbers of guns are the least likely to use them. if tomorrow we went out and manufactured a bunch of guns and distributed them to already existing owners that wouldn't lower (or raise) expectations as to the number of crimes that might be committed. So having more guns per person is a false metric. Individuals owning multiple guns are watering down that statistic.

If statistics were available of the number of armed citizens versus number of citizens committing gun crimes that would be a useful comparison.

Een that would be problematic because it's hard to say whether some of the gun crimes were multiple crimes by the same individual.
 
I hate it when that happens, then your hoe doesn't lubricate properly and chafing occurs.

For serious.

Told that noob to be easy on her, she's an old hoe...almost 20!

She might be cheap but that doesn't make it right to just go beating on her like that.

Chafing my wallet....oh well, doesn't mean I can't enjoy it :cool:
 
Last edited:
Being interested =/= 'swooning'.

I'm not entirely sure what your point is.

:D I thank you for self-proving your disingenuous one, anyway.

Switzerland = 94% / 6%

Discuss.

Edit to add:

Please also consider the infamous ethnicity of 65% of that 94% total...

...you know, to really turn your subjective statist stat crap upside down.
 
Last edited:
Just for a change Ishtard doesn't like what a female poster is saying so blames it on hormones. Shocker.
 
Just for a change Ishtard doesn't like what a female poster is saying so blames it on hormones. Shocker.

I did wonder if the whole uterus thing was the issue. It's so old and redundant I'm surprised it's still able to piss someone off that much.
 
:D I thank you for self-proving your disingenuous one, anyway.

Switzerland = 94% / 6%

Discuss.

Edit to add:

Please also consider the infamous ethnicity of 65% of that 94% total...

...you know, to really turn your subjective statist stat crap upside down.

Ok ... I'm just going to leave you to talk to yourself and who ever else feels like engaging.
 
Ok ... I'm just going to leave you to talk to yourself and who ever else feels like engaging.

I would say so...

Rather than address what 65% of the 94% white Swiss population might mean to your irrelevant, statist babbling, besides needing to remain completely silent on that overall 94% itself.

You also choose not to address the fact of your utter lack of American constitutional comprehension, which is, of course, VITAL to ALL practicality of this issue.

You're no different than any other foreign piece of socialist shit who posts here: all you're into is really pimping nothing else than more irrelevant unicorn farts to inflate your bigoted subjectivity.

The naturally beautiful thing about the TRUTH of this whole matter is (as you keep validating yourself):

No matter how many unicorn farts you need to blow out of your socialist ass, you'll never comprehend an iota of what revolutionary American political principle(s) is ALL about.

Wannabe is you.
 
I did wonder if the whole uterus thing was the issue. It's so old and redundant I'm surprised it's still able to piss someone off that much.

Ishtard hates women. Especially if they don't agree with him.
 
I would say so...

Rather than address what 65% of the 94% white Swiss population might mean to your irrelevant, statist babbling, besides needing to remain completely silent on that overall 94% itself.

You also choose not to address the fact of your utter lack of American constitutional comprehension, which is, of course, VITAL to ALL practicality of this issue.

You're no different than any other foreign piece of socialist shit who posts here: all you're into is really pimping nothing else than more irrelevant unicorn farts to inflate your bigoted subjectivity.

The naturally beautiful thing about the TRUTH of this whole matter is (as you keep validating yourself):

No matter how many unicorn farts you need to blow out of your socialist ass, you'll never comprehend an iota of what revolutionary American political principle(s) is ALL about.

Wannabe is you.

Nothing like a solid, logical, evidence-based argument.
 
I generally choose to interact with or not interact with people including Rob and his puppets based on how they present themselves in a particular post and I wouldn't presume to tell anyone else who to interact with about what, but I feel like I should point out to you that this is RobDownSouth's recently formed alt. He created it to replace his FreudianSlip alt that he had tarnished by going full "Skiddles" mode.

He had gotten some traction with that particular all by presenting fairly reasonable, intelligent-sounding posts where he borrows (without attribution) from scholarly sources. This particular sock puppet of his is supposed to be the new "smart" one.

He's not very organized about all of this so he frequently forgets which sock puppet he's using for what. The one thing he is consistent about is on his parent account RobDownSouth he always has a reference to me in his profile. He has made it his mission for the last 3 or 4 years to quote run me off the board unquote.



This is RobDownSouth in full unfiltered mode.^^^^

He has a rotating, never-ending army of sock puppets that he uses to impugn other people by making it appear that more than one person is fighting with his target while keeping RobDownSouth looking less manaically obsessed with "winning" the internet than he actually is.

Why can't it be a marionette?
 
Back
Top