Republicans Want More Abortions.

[Aglaopheme]

How do you figure that supports your team using the government to force others to violate their religious beliefs?

Not being able to force others to violate their religious beliefs to your benefit anymore isn't the same as them forcing their beliefs upon you.

In the very simplest of terms, you cannot break the law simply because you feel like it. Not. An you discriminate against women.

My guess is you are morally opposed to a lot of your taxes, a lot of the regulations placers in you, you still have to pay up an follow them.

That is a start with the whole over reaching 'moral' addition.

You cannot favor one religious view, or one religion.

 

[RobDownSouth]

How do you figure that supports your team using the government to force others to violate their religious beliefs?

Not being able to force others to violate their religious beliefs to your benefit anymore isn't the same as them forcing their beliefs upon you.

There's a disturbing trend in Murica, an increasing willingness to allow the actions of individuals to disadvantage and/or endanger others if those actions derive from "religious faith".

This won't affect YOU, of course, as you are a government parasite mooching off the VA healthcare system. So naturally you have no issue with other healthcare providers denying care to others under the umbrella of religion.

 

[BotanyBoy]

In the very simplest of terms, you cannot break the law simply because you feel like it. Not. An you discriminate against women.

Certain companies not providing women with certain services is discrimination against women?

So we should shut down Men's Warehouse or force them to sell a full line and assortment of womenz clothing then?

Tampax forced to provide jocks to the men of the USA?

Where do you draw the line on forcing companies and people to provide certain goods and services in the name of equitable distribution of goods and services??

At what point exactly are people allowed to run their own companies and conduct their own business? Do you even think that people should be allowed to have a choice in what goods and services they decide to provide?

My guess is you are morally opposed to a lot of your taxes, a lot of the regulations placers in you, you still have to pay up an follow them.

That doesn't make them right or in some cases even in accordance with the law.

And no, I just have to not get caught breaking them and hire a shit hot CPA/law firm to handle/mitigate the rest.

You cannot favor one religious view, or one religion.

Nothing about this new policy favors any particular religion or institutes one as a legal authority.

It applies to all equally.

 

[BotanyBoy]

There's a disturbing trend in Murica, an increasing willingness to allow the actions of individuals to disadvantage and/or endanger others if those actions derive from "religious faith".

It's not a trend.

It's called freedom of religion and capitalism. It's been the American standard for 225 years guy......the disturbing trend is that you and a growing number of others want to see freedom of religion and the freedom to engage in the private exchange of goods and services destroyed.

This won't affect YOU, of course, as you are a government parasite mooching off the VA healthcare system.

How am I mooching? You've never been able to answer that one.....

It won't affect me because I pay cash for my own HC.

So naturally you have no issue with other healthcare providers denying care to others under the umbrella of religion.

I have no issue with any providers of whatever having the freedom to choose what goods and services they wish to provide.

Because USA, not Soviet Russia.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Certain companies not providing women with certain services is discrimination against women?

So we should shut down Men's Warehouse or force them to sell a full line and assortment of womenz clothing then?

Tampax forced to provide jocks to the men of the USA?

Where do you draw the line on forcing companies and people to provide certain goods and services in the name of equitable distribution of goods and services??

At what point exactly are people allowed to run their own companies and conduct their own business? Do you even think that people should be allowed to have a choice in what goods and services they decide to provide?




That doesn't make them right or in some cases even in accordance with the law.

And no, I just have to not get caught breaking them and hire a shit hot CPA/law firm to handle/mitigate the rest.



Nothing about this new policy favors any particular religion or institutes one as a legal authority.

It applies to all equally.

Do you think we should go back to segregated businesses? Is it okay to say no blacks allowed?

It does favor certain religions, because most have absolutely no objections to the use of birth control.




Thornton v. Caldor (1985)
Private companies are free to fire people who refuse to work on any day they claim is their Sabbath, because the First Amendment applies only to government, not to private employers.

That's one for you to start with, there are more.

 

[richard_daily]

No, they think not paying for either is cheaper.

Then let them remove coverage for viagra.

 

[richard_daily]

It's not a trend.

It's called freedom of religion and capitalism. It's been the American standard for 225 years guy......the disturbing trend is that you and a growing number of others want to see freedom of religion and the freedom to engage in the private exchange of goods and services destroyed.



How am I mooching? You've never been able to answer that one.....

It won't affect me because I pay cash for my own HC.



I have no issue with any providers of whatever having the freedom to choose what goods and services they wish to provide.

Because USA, not Soviet Russia.

BB, do you ever have sex?