adrina is a communist

No, it's exactly the point. Coach was an a-grade wanker, who threatened admittedly laughable physical violence, and not one of you said 'steady on mate - that's a bit uncalled for". Adrina allegedly is mean to men just because they're men (although the actual evidence for this seems to be delayed due to a postal strike ... bloody communists) and you're all ready to jump.
Your standards seem to be a little partial, no?

Well, if Coachwhatsisname was an idiot, why blame ME for it? I didn't do anything. I don't even know what happened or what caused it. I wasn't here or involved.

Guilt by association as a reason to justify all of this? Then why aren't you also including Manu in your blame game? He wasn't here, prolly doesn't know what happened, and didn't do anything either.

So, your all encompassing rationale is a little harsh don't you think?

And, you keep banging on the "no evidence" drum. MY OPINION doesn't need any additional evidence beyond my own observations for me to believe it. That you choose to believe differently in spite of the current board atmosphere is your decision. NEITHER of which changes the issue;

Adrina gets crapped on because of what she posts. Deserved or not, that's what happens.

If she doesn't like it, SHE has to fix it or go home. Implicit in that is the idea if she DOESN'T fix it, she must want the results she gets. Whether it's because she's playing everyone, or being played, I don't know. I don't care. I just know I'm tired of the bullshit.

I've reached the end of this discussion because you don't want to acknowledge those points. What you want to do is start a fight over nothing. Thank you for thinking me a worthy opponent but I don't want to play.
 
I know you're not gonna last long in this version before Mama Laurel shivs your neck again, but I gotta ask...

...how do you fuck up a quote? :D


Dr. hashy is on the spectrum, which explains both the botched quoting, and the current moniker.
 
All I'm saying is show us the stuff you've observed that has led you to be off the opinion that Adrina hates men. Otherwise you're basically saying 'Adrina is a misandrist because that's my opinion'. But she should change this curre8 hypothetical behaviour because you don't like it? :rolleyes:

Well, if Coachwhatsisname was an idiot, why blame ME for it? I didn't do anything. I don't even know what happened or what caused it. I wasn't here or involved.

Guilt by association as a reason to justify all of this? Then why aren't you also including Manu in your blame game? He wasn't here, prolly doesn't know what happened, and didn't do anything either.

So, your all encompassing rationale is a little harsh don't you think?

And, you keep banging on the "no evidence" drum. MY OPINION doesn't need any additional evidence beyond my own observations for me to believe it. That you choose to believe differently in spite of the current board atmosphere is your decision. NEITHER of which changes the issue;

Adrina gets crapped on because of what she posts. Deserved or not, that's what happens.

If she doesn't like it, SHE has to fix it or go home. Implicit in that is the idea if she DOESN'T fix it, she must want the results she gets. Whether it's because she's playing everyone, or being played, I don't know. I don't care. I just know I'm tired of the bullshit.

I've reached the end of this discussion because you don't want to acknowledge those points. What you want to do is start a fight over nothing. Thank you for thinking me a worthy opponent but I don't want to play.
 
I get that ... I was just on my phone and couldn't be bothered checking your profile to see if you had a gender nominated in there, so was going for the fairly well-accepted gender neutral 'they' ... and obviously your profile isn't any help in that regard anyway.
it's EF. nuff said.

Do you require instruction on how to use semicolons, again?
a refresher on commas, too, it would appear.

Case. In. Point.
indeedio!

???
Also I never said 'treat it as a conversation you shouldn't have heard'. Who the fuck has conversations in the supermarket if the care about others hearing them? I just meant those conversations aren't necessarily FOR you.
Difficult concept when the universe revolves around you and your massive brain I suppose.
it's just mond-bogglingly stupid. you have more patience than i do.

It's a stop the presses moment. :rolleyes:

He's a sharp one alright. I find most conservative men to have misogynistic tendencies. Crazy huh. How utterly inconsiderate and mean of me to not respect the men that don't respect me. What was I thinking? I'll need to sit down with myself and give me a good stern talking to
when it comes to guys like those here berating you, 'thinking' is the problem. it makes them feel threatened.

did it work?

What you are trying to "prove" is the superiority of your subjective opinion. Finding how many times Adrina used the word "misogynist" in posts proves nothing. Did you also search for counterexamples , where she complimented or praised men? If you did not, you no more proved that she hates men than I could prove the sky is not blue by conducting my research on a rainy day.

And where did you get the idea that you were empowered to try to control what she, or anyone else, posts? If you don't like reading her, put her on ignore. Stop pretending that you are some kindly Daddy figure, setting her straight for her own good. That's called Paternalism. Go ahead and have a hissy fit about that now.

I did not demand proof of her reputation one way or another. I pointed out that the burden of proof lies with the accuser, and it is not the responsibility of her, or anyone else, to disprove your claim.

Frankly, I don't care about her reputation. I make up own mind about people. Sometimes I'm right, sometimes I'm off base, but the decision is mine. I have my own opinion of her, and now,I have my own about you.
i'd say adrina has a pretty positive reputation here amongst many regulars; this 'terrible' rep she's being ascribed is shared between the few. and they ARE arseholes.

I see no reason for Adrina to change, even if I believed I had a voice in telling her so. What I see are certain men criticizing her for her refusal to accept worse. It's only among that contingent that she has an alleged reputation problem. And to that, I say, fuck 'em.
this

Why should she change to suit a pile of dogs?

Have you spoken out about coach binky threatening Kim, or his multiple reading comprehension problems that caused him to lash out at everyone, or did you just sit by on the sidelines egging him on? Did you sit by when he made broad and sweeping generalizations about women? When he blamed his politicals and penis for the treatment he was receiving? Perhaps you told him he should change?
she needs to go right on being herself :)
 
Adrina just chooses not to suffer fools gladly.

Not her fault if they happen to have a cock.
 
I see no reason for Adrina to change, even if I believed I had a voice in telling her so. What I see are certain men criticizing her for her refusal to accept worse. It's only among that contingent that she has an alleged reputation problem. And to that, I say, fuck 'em.

Yeah, fuck 'em and send you dick pics for your vast collection.

Lol.
 
The fact that most liberal women don't like you doesn't make them misandrists. You need a larger and actually random sample size to test this theory properly.

Bullshit. Liberal women like to blame all of their problems on oppressive men and patriarchy instead of themselves. Victimhood is a lot easier that way. It's a great excuse for getting fat, staying hysterically ignorant, angry, irrelevant, and unproductive.
 
There's that anger again. You angry conservative men. Always directing your anger at women, liberals and women liberals.

Perhaps you should take responsibility for your temperament. :rolleyes:

And ya'll wonder why you have earned the title of snowflake. :rose:
 
There's that anger again. You angry conservative men. Always directing your anger at women, liberals and women liberals.

Perhaps you should take responsibility for your temperament. :rolleyes:

And ya'll wonder why you have earned the title of snowflake. :rose:

Who's angry? You?

Only whiney liberals seeking their safe spaces can be snowflakes your cultural exportation attempts notwithstanding.
 
Yes because you are so convincing as the calm, cool and collected individual who has control of his emotional outbursts.

If the shoe fits dude. And it most certainly does.

Snowflake. :rose:
 
Yes because you are so convincing as the calm, cool and collected individual who has control of his emotional outbursts.

If the shoe fits dude. And it most certainly does.

Snowflake. :rose:

Show me an "emotional" outburst, Snowflake.
 
The last post on the last page. :rolleyes:

Such venom. But no, that's not an emotional outburst. You betcha.

You're still a snowflake. Just like most of your ilk.
 
The last post on the last page. :rolleyes:

Such venom. But no, that's not an emotional outburst. You betcha.

You're still a snowflake. Just like most of your ilk.

My posts are not generated by anger or emotion, just straight-faced assessments, and truth. Getting angry is counterproductive and unhealthy. I'm probably either smiling or smirking most of the time. Who gets angry playing chess? The loser.
 
There's that anger again. You angry conservative men. Always directing your anger at women, liberals and women liberals.

Perhaps you should take responsibility for your temperament. :rolleyes:

And ya'll wonder why you have earned the title of snowflake. :rose:

Projecting Again?
 
This thread is boring.
Adriana, some Listers are not worth the response. Don't waste your energy.
 
Adriana said:
And ya'll wonder why you have earned the title of snowflake.

Projecting Again?

The attempts to redefine the term 'snowflakes' are truly pathetic, the term has been and always will be a very fitting term for the liberals who 'melt down' when their feelings get hurt, they feel a 'microaggression coming on, or somebody makes fun of their therapy dog or 'butthurt' coloring book. But then, they try this with their history too, such as race biting when it was liberals who wrote 'Jim Crow' laws, created KKK, etc. Flailing whiners 😱

“You are not special. You are not a beautiful and unique snowflake. You are the same organic and decaying matter as everyone else.”
 
Last edited:
I can't believe that you guys haven't gotten Adrina to burn her commie card. Your arguments are so convincing and NOT ANGRY.
 
The attempts to redefine the term 'snowflakes' are truly pathetic, the term has been and always will be a very fitting term for the liberals who 'melt down' when their feelings get hurt, they feel a 'microaggression coming on, or somebody makes fun of their therapy dog or 'butthurt' coloring book. But then, they try this with their history too, such as race biting when it was liberals who wrote 'Jim Crow' laws, created KKK, etc. Flailing whiners 😱

You're as stupid as they come. "Liberals" created Jim Crow and the KKK? Your historical knowledge doesn't even rise to the level of your understanding of how to talk to women.

The only degrees you have are the 98.6 that keep your mentally inert body alive.
 
Back
Top