I Am Now A Social Justice Whiner!

[irksomesauce]

Why, yes you are, little snowflake.

http://www.sherv.net/cm/emo/laughing/roflmao.gif

 

[richard_daily]

I'd consider you more of a lazy religious nutjob.

 

[cjh]

This reads like whine to me. Is this whine?

Remember when Hall's "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" was once like an unratified amendment to the Constitution, so prevalent was its truth to America's political spirit?

Not any more.

Just like monstrously denying the most innocent and defenseless among us the unalienable right to life by intentionally and tortuously killing babies simply for convenience, now the communists/progressives/Democrats/leftists/liberals in America are denying everyone they don't agree with the unalienable rights of free speech and assembly, simply because free speech and assembly is inconvenient, too, to their communist ideology, and wield their communist hammer of violence to quash both...



Read that again: it's "not the words or ideas" of the mentioned despicable speaker University of Florida President W. Kent Fuchs proclaims as the reason UF is denying First Amendment rights to that same speaker; it is "The likelihood of violence and potential injury" AGAINST that speaker's words and ideas and those who would peacefully assemble in support which is why UF is disallowing the right to free speech and assembly in direct violation of the First Amendment.

Yep, progressives are now successfully using their communist mob rule force and violence to totally suppress the unalienable rights of free speech and assembly in America, unabashedly outing themselves as unarguable domestic enemies of the Constitution for the United States of America itself.

Little, whiny, socialist-raised babies who never grew up enough to grasp the native truth of Sticks and stones may brake my bones, but words can never hurt me, now jackboot march with violent force to suppress the free speech of everyone who doesn't share their communist ideology...

And yet, as always, the immutable law of cause and effect awaits.

American Shame on the University of Florida and its President for so easily surrendering to the communists' promise of violence to shut down free speech and peaceful assembly, instead of standing up and defending the First Amendment.

Why, it's almost as if UF sides with the communist domestic enemies of the Constitution.

University of Florida denies white nationalist event request, citing ‘serious concerns for safety’
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...s-concerns-for-safety/?utm_term=.c60a72499ecb


* for reference, and if so inclined, research LIT back over the years to read the infamous eyer prophesying that it would, indeed, be the socialist liberals/progressives who would clamor for the quashing of free speech.

And also: note the glee in which the native progressive pos here on LIT are reveling because of the anti-First Amendment "success" their communist tribe is currently enjoying.

 

[irksomesauce]

...

When did you lose your free speech balls, alice?

 

[cjh]

When did you lose your free speech balls, alice?

I'm not the one whining about lost free speech.

 

[AngeloMichael]

Why, yes you are, little snowflake.

http://www.sherv.net/cm/emo/laughing/roflmao.gif

Yep and the blizzard is coming.

With apologies to Obi-wan Kenobi, Who's more the whiner, he who whines or he who whines about the whiner?

 

[irksomesauce]

I'm not the one whining about lost free speech.

Why would you when you've obviously lost the balls to universally DEFEND and CHAMPION it.

Please answer so all your communist/progressive pals on LIT are clear:

Why do you not DEFEND and CHAMPION the freedom of speech and to peacefully assemble for those whose viewpoints you disagree with and might even completely despise?

If I have the constitutional right, backed-up by court injunction, to speak and peacefully assemble - NO MATTER WHAT THE FUCK MY VIEWS - and you choose to physically come and forcefully oppose those constitutional rights of mine...

...where does the responsibility lie when the inevitable FRICTION ignites and violence and even death occurs?

[Not for one SINGLE minute lessening even an ounce of individual responsibility an individual so consumed with hate (racism, bigotry and whatever other of hate's akas) has to so inhumanely, so murderously use his vehicle to plow into other individuals.]

You know, I fully believe that God endows all conceived humans with the unalienable right to life and that all who endorse abortion for convenience are no better than cold-blooded murderers...

...but I will never take that uncompromising view of mine and physically oppose with frictional conflict, violence and/or death those who consider murderers, simply because doing so would make me basically no different than them.

There is simply no justification for physical offense of any nature - NO MATTER ANYONE'S VIEWS.

 

[Que]

Yep and the blizzard is coming.

With apologies to Obi-wan Kenobi, Who's more the whiner, he who whines or he who whines about the whiner?

The term ypu are looking for is meta-whiner.

 

[richard_daily]

Why would you when you've obviously lost the balls to universally DEFEND and CHAMPION it.

Please answer so all your communist/progressive pals on LIT are clear:

Why do you not DEFEND and CHAMPION the freedom of speech and to peacefully assemble for those whose viewpoints you disagree with and might even completely despise?

If I have the constitutional right, backed-up by court injunction, to speak and peacefully assemble - NO MATTER WHAT THE FUCK MY VIEWS - and you choose to physically come and forcefully oppose those constitutional rights of mine...

...where does the responsibility lie when the inevitable FRICTION ignites and violence and even death occurs?

[Not for one SINGLE minute lessening even an ounce of individual responsibility an individual so consumed with hate (racism, bigotry and whatever other of hate's akas) has to so inhumanely, so murderously use his vehicle to plow into other individuals.]

You know, I fully believe that God endows all conceived humans with the unalienable right to life and that all who endorse abortion for convenience are no better than cold-blooded murderers...

...but I will never take that uncompromising view of mine and physically oppose with frictional conflict, violence and/or death those who consider murderers, simply because doing so would make me basically no different than them.

There is simply no justification for physical offense of any nature - NO MATTER ANYONE'S VIEWS.

So, you're blaming the counter protestors for a nazi running people over?

That wasn't free speech, it was second degree murder.

That's what actually happened, in the reality of the situation. Everything else is just you blustering.

 

[cjh]

Why would you when you've obviously lost the balls to universally DEFEND and CHAMPION it.

Please answer so all your communist/progressive pals on LIT are clear:

Why do you not DEFEND and CHAMPION the freedom of speech and to peacefully assemble for those whose viewpoints you disagree with and might even completely despise?

If I have the constitutional right, backed-up by court injunction, to speak and peacefully assemble - NO MATTER WHAT THE FUCK MY VIEWS - and you choose to physically come and forcefully oppose those constitutional rights of mine...

...where does the responsibility lie when the inevitable FRICTION ignites and violence and even death occurs?

[Not for one SINGLE minute lessening even an ounce of individual responsibility an individual so consumed with hate (racism, bigotry and whatever other of hate's akas) has to so inhumanely, so murderously use his vehicle to plow into other individuals.]

You know, I fully believe that God endows all conceived humans with the unalienable right to life and that all who endorse abortion for convenience are no better than cold-blooded murderers...

...but I will never take that uncompromising view of mine and physically oppose with frictional conflict, violence and/or death those who consider murderers, simply because doing so would make me basically no different than them.

There is simply no justification for physical offense of any nature - NO MATTER ANYONE'S VIEWS.

You don't know anything, motherfucker.

I've been on the board of a state ACLU affiliate for years.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/a...p-for-charlottesville-protest/article/2631519

Some people do.

Others post on porn boards.

 

[irksomesauce]

You don't know anything, motherfucker.

I've been on the board of a state ACLU affiliate for years.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/a...p-for-charlottesville-protest/article/2631519

Some people do.

Others post on porn boards.

Nothing cries WANNABE! more than an insecure ego that needs to self-pimp accomplishment and then ASSume like all fools do that their self-inflation is automatically superior to what they can't possibly have pertinent knowledge of.

So, rather than blowing your ego up even more, why don't you just answer the question:

If I have the constitutional right, backed-up by court injunction, to speak and peacefully assemble - NO MATTER WHAT THE FUCK MY VIEWS - and you choose to physically come and forcefully oppose those constitutional rights of mine...

...where does the responsibility lie when the inevitable FRICTION ignites and violence and even death occurs?

 

[cfuhrer]

That wasn't free speech, it was second degree murder.

That's what actually happened, in the reality of the situation. Everything else is just you blustering.

So then why won't everyone let it go?
Turn it over to the courts and move the fuck on.

 

[AngeloMichael]

Talk about a whiner!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=7&v=lyeTj002DCo

I can imagine him fitting in on Lit with the likes of BB and Renard and them acting the same in his place.

I wish no violent harm to come to this person, I denounce anyone that does so, but I won't deny a feeling of schadenfreude at his plight.

 

[Que]

So, you're blaming the counter protestors for a nazi running people over?

That wasn't free speech, it was second degree murder.

That's what actually happened, in the reality of the situation. Everything else is just you blustering.

The charge of second-degree murder it has yet to be litigated.

You will notice that he was not brought up on terrorism charges or first-degree murder because there is no evidence of premeditation.

It is alleged that the cops herded the lawfully assembled, permitted protestors into the armed, unlawfully assembled counter-protestors.

It is also alleged that he was surrounded by countetprotestors and that clubs were used against the car.

If he reacted in anger and retaliation for his car being beat on then you have second degree murder if in fact he had a reasonable fear for his safety and he reacted to that you have manslaughter or an acquittal.

On a positive note at least this time the early reports that it's a white right-wing wacko actually withstood the first 12 hours. Some numbskulls here are still insisting the Jared Lautner is a right-wing wacko.

In the unlikely event that the facts show 2nd degree homocide, this particular wacko is a strong McNaughton candidate. He has a history of schizophrenia.

Remove that particular wacko from the events of the day and what you have is inexcusable violence coming from the left aided and abetted by law enforcement wilful or negligent actions.

I'm quite sure every angle of this event is on video. It will come out and when it does just like the time when the leftist Professor assaulted somebody with a bike lock everyone on the left will pretend it didn't happen. The only reason why these antifa protesters have not killed anybody is that they're not very good at their hobby.

 

[irksomesauce]

I wish no violent harm to come to this person, I denounce anyone that does so, but...

As the axiom goes: everything before the "but" is bullshit.

 

[richard_daily]

So then why won't everyone let it go?
Turn it over to the courts and move the fuck on.

Because white racists want it to happen again. They all want it to be the start of the Turner Diaries.

That's why.