I'm not making it personal...
... just admiring the charts and graphs.
I didn't until she decided to.
You're not imagining it: the rich really are hoarding economic growth
- Thread starter adrina
- Start date
I didn't until she decided to.
Nipples_Mcgee1
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2017
- Posts
- 1,006
Economics by pictures.
What's not to love about that?
Here's something for you to look up. Ever since Trump's border crackdown, wages have been rising...
Hey, asshole, the number of illegal immigrants in USA maxed out long before Trump came into office. Do you care about true facts at all?
4est_4est_Gump
Run Forrest! RUN!
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2011
- Posts
- 89,007
charts and graphs
Circling, circling, circling..., oh yeah, and strangely denigrating, because when you do it, it's a good thing right? Europe employs consumption taxes in the form of a VAT, so once again, you appear to be uninformed when you claim "a completely new system which has major unanswered critiques leveled at it..."
The current system has many, many unanswered critiques leveled at it including your own. I don't think you see it that way.
Charts and graphs don't include critiques...
Circling, circling, circling..., oh yeah, and strangely denigrating, because when you do it, it's a good thing right? Europe employs consumption taxes in the form of a VAT, so once again, you appear to be uninformed when you claim "a completely new system which has major unanswered critiques leveled at it..."
The current system has many, many unanswered critiques leveled at it including your own. I don't think you see it that way.
Charts and graphs don't include critiques...
Such a victim. You are truly a special snowflake.
There you go...it's my fault you say dumb shit. Dig in your heels and refuse to admit you screwed up. That's your plan and you're sticking to it.
Perfect.
You're in way over your your head here.
4est_4est_Gump
Run Forrest! RUN!
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2011
- Posts
- 89,007
All that your pictures show is that .01% of the population make a lot more money than the median. They do not show causality. I have given you several factors of cause, but you denigrate them and ridicule them.
You need look no further than Silicon Valley to see another mechanism. There very rich people run companies that just do not need a large workforce. The few employees they have are, indeed, very productive and very well paid and the officers and original shareholders help skew your beautiful charts and graphs because charts and graphs do not include the changing landscape of business methods and models. You take the simplistic view that we can do something about this, that there is just an easy fix by pushing the tax code back. To what point we're going to push it back to, you offer no clue, and trust me on this issue, even if a majority felt like you do that we need to push it back, you cannot get any sort of a consensus on the central point, where, at what point, we are going to push it back to?
And guess who will still be at the top no matter how you try to bring them down...
You need look no further than Silicon Valley to see another mechanism. There very rich people run companies that just do not need a large workforce. The few employees they have are, indeed, very productive and very well paid and the officers and original shareholders help skew your beautiful charts and graphs because charts and graphs do not include the changing landscape of business methods and models. You take the simplistic view that we can do something about this, that there is just an easy fix by pushing the tax code back. To what point we're going to push it back to, you offer no clue, and trust me on this issue, even if a majority felt like you do that we need to push it back, you cannot get any sort of a consensus on the central point, where, at what point, we are going to push it back to?
And guess who will still be at the top no matter how you try to bring them down...
EternalFantasies
EqualOportunity"Offender"
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2017
- Posts
- 4,663
Water 505 her consistency comment was to me about consistent expression through gifs.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
And its basic supply and demand of labor. Post WWII, tech sloping up, automation sloping up, production for export sloping up (WWII caused much US exports after it), etc.
Labor being the primary cost at the time (cost more than capital to produce something), entry of women into the workforce, at that point in time, and in that manner (movement, force, activism, etc), simply increased the supply of labor, and reduced its cost. It created the beginning of that gap in the graph.
Research who funded the women's lib movement, it may complete that circle of knowledge.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
And its basic supply and demand of labor. Post WWII, tech sloping up, automation sloping up, production for export sloping up (WWII caused much US exports after it), etc.
Labor being the primary cost at the time (cost more than capital to produce something), entry of women into the workforce, at that point in time, and in that manner (movement, force, activism, etc), simply increased the supply of labor, and reduced its cost. It created the beginning of that gap in the graph.
Research who funded the women's lib movement, it may complete that circle of knowledge.
Last edited:
What in the Wide World of Sports are you talking about, Professor Gibberish?
EternalFantasies
EqualOportunity"Offender"
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2017
- Posts
- 4,663
Where's the confusion?
4est_4est_Gump
Run Forrest! RUN!
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2011
- Posts
- 89,007
We're all supposed to go to college anyway.
Working is only for the stupid...
Or the "undocumented."
Working is only for the stupid...
Or the "undocumented."
Obviously between your ears. Your post is stream of consciousness nonsense. The last sentence was the cherry on top.
EternalFantasies
EqualOportunity"Offender"
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2017
- Posts
- 4,663
1. Go back and check where she wrote 'consistency' first.
2. No, my basic supply and demand suggestion is not nonsense - go back and read my post yesterday with the dates I provided.
3. The funding of the women's lib I'll leave it for another thread, it's beside the point. But do some research it won't hurt you.
Why would I want to read more of your posts? The last one was more than enough.
That aside, exactly what does "research who funded women's liberation completes the circle" mean?
Probably the same as people who hoard economic growth.
What is the source of the research you recommend?
richard_daily
Slut Whisperer
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2006
- Posts
- 36,898
AJ does whatever American Thinker tells him to do.
Even if it's not in his own best interest.
This is straight out of the new Republican party's playbook.
Get uneducated, simple-minded folks to vote against their best interests.
richard_daily
Slut Whisperer
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2006
- Posts
- 36,898
It does show casualty... You're just too dense to get it.
Every time the top 1 (or .01) percent get a bigger slice of the pie, that's less pie for people like you.
richard_daily
Slut Whisperer
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2006
- Posts
- 36,898
You're not rich. You'll never be rich.
You vote to help the rich, and they laugh at you.
You're a joke. Your entire life is a joke. Your political philosophy is a joke.
4est_4est_Gump
Run Forrest! RUN!
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2011
- Posts
- 89,007
He's just part of my ignore list.
Just let him cackle with the rest of the ignorants...
Just let him cackle with the rest of the ignorants...
Nipples_Mcgee1
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2017
- Posts
- 1,006
richard_daily
Slut Whisperer
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2006
- Posts
- 36,898
Oh look, it's the guy who re-posts american thinker articles 4 times a day.
Another one who can't realize that he will never be rich, and pretends like he will be.
Keep voting republican AJ! They love the ignorant, uneducated votes.
Another one who can't realize that he will never be rich, and pretends like he will be.
Keep voting republican AJ! They love the ignorant, uneducated votes.
Jesus, another one.
You said something really stupid, and when someone called you on it you attack them.
It explains everything about you.
Do you really think all rich people inherited their money instead of earning it? You did say that, didn't you?
It's a simple yes or no question.
I can't put him on ignore. He's pure entertainment.
4est_4est_Gump
Run Forrest! RUN!
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2011
- Posts
- 89,007
I can't take a poster seriously unless he employs the word joke a minimum of four times...
I just can't do it.
I just can't do it.
Similar threads
