Transgender Military - DISTRACTION

BoyNextDoor

I hate liars
Joined
Apr 19, 2010
Posts
14,158
Fuck the Trump. We are onto his bullshit.

Can't us distract from your inability to lead your party or unfitness to govern the nation.
 
I think this is one to watch to see one of Trump's techniques. He put it out in a tweet. His chumps will read it there and assume that he carries through with it and therefore is giving them what they want. But I think it might just die without anything being done about it. Cheap fan base feed. Plus, as noted, the concentration on this distracts from concentration elsewhere.
 
I think this is one to watch to see one of Trump's techniques. He put it out in a tweet. His chumps will read it there and assume that he carries through with it and therefore is giving them what they want. But I think it might just die without anything being done about it. Cheap fan base feed. Plus, as noted, the concentration on this distracts from concentration elsewhere.

The tweet timing is suspect, but Mattis has already taken some action, or inaction as the case may be.
 
Fuck the Trump. We are onto his bullshit.

Can't us distract from your inability to lead your party or unfitness to govern the nation.

Who made you the spokesman for "we" and "us?" Wouldn't you say it's a little presumptuous to speak for all those people?

Maybe this falls under the progressive meme everybody knows.

Horseshit.
 
On one hand I agree with Trump's view:

The Army is too vital to have all the leftist PC madness subvert and destabilize it too,
and distract people who are putting their lives on line.

But he's m8sdirecting it. Taking a swing at or discriminating against transgenders isn't the way to go.
They're only seen as pawns by the leftist machine.
 
Funny. When "transgenderism" becomes the topic, the left suddenly loves the military and views service to the nation as "valiant".
 
The Army is too vital to have all the leftist PC madness subvert and destabilize it too, and distract people who are putting their lives on line.

There are literally thousands of different military occupational specialties in the various service branches. Why would I or anyone else care about the sexual preferences or prior gender of a vehicle mechanic, heavy equipment operator, file clerk, cook, plumber, electrician, personnel officer, supply clerk, air traffic controller, PR specialist, photographer, truck driver, pharmacist, painter, carpenter, financial analyst, radar operator, or computer programmer?

Among others.
 
There are literally thousands of different military occupational specialties in the various service branches. Why would I or anyone else care about the sexual preferences or prior gender of a vehicle mechanic, heavy equipment operator, file clerk, cook, plumber, electrician, personnel officer, supply clerk, air traffic controller, PR specialist, photographer, truck driver, pharmacist, painter, carpenter, financial analyst, radar operator, or computer programmer?

Among others.
Under this logic why not allow people with one hand or blind or deaf or any other GIMP condition to serve in the military in thesee minor positions

tell us tranny Hogan

tell us
 
There are literally thousands of different military occupational specialties in the various service branches. Why would I or anyone else care about the sexual preferences or prior gender of a vehicle mechanic, heavy equipment operator, file clerk, cook, plumber, electrician, personnel officer, supply clerk, air traffic controller, PR specialist, photographer, truck driver, pharmacist, painter, carpenter, financial analyst, radar operator, or computer programmer?

Among others.

Agree with you.
 
There are literally thousands of different military occupational specialties in the various service branches. Why would I or anyone else care about the sexual preferences or prior gender of a vehicle mechanic, heavy equipment operator, file clerk, cook, plumber, electrician, personnel officer, supply clerk, air traffic controller, PR specialist, photographer, truck driver, pharmacist, painter, carpenter, financial analyst, radar operator, or computer programmer?

Among others.

Because, if "gender," the political construct, is about mental confusion the you most certainly don't want someone in the tower who might have mental issues any more than you want to give them access to sensitive data or working on the avionics of a multi-million dollar aircraft. We're not involved in a war large enough to require a draft, we don't need Cpl. Klinger, we can just send him home.

Another thought is the number of people it will deter from taking up a military career.

Target took a stock dive that it hasn't recovered from.
 
Under this logic why not allow people with one hand or blind or deaf or any other GIMP condition to serve in the military in thesee minor positions

tell us tranny Hogan

tell us

Yeah, we can have a lot of fucked up minor positions. Our military can be a vast dumping ground for all kinds of human wreckage. Liberals have always tried to make the military the employer of last resort.:rolleyes:
 
Yeah, we can have a lot of fucked up minor positions. Our military can be a vast dumping ground for all kinds of human wreckage. Liberals have always tried to make the military the employer of last resort.:rolleyes:

During the Gulf war, the story was that our military was nothing but the desperate who couldn't find a civilian job, so they joined up for a job, not a war...


Those were the days.
 
During the Gulf war, the story was that our military was nothing but the desperate who couldn't find a civilian job, so they joined up for a job, not a war...


Those were the days.

Recall as well that when the Iraq War started we were in the process of suffering from a crippling Bill Clinton defense cut that had chopped the Army in half 16 divisions down to 8, which required the hiring of tens of thousands of "contractors" to fortify the effort.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top